st century due to advanced digital technology. Students' in the present day are growing up in a society which is immensely different compared to their teachers. Many educators are struggling to keep up with the modern evolution and there is a need to change teacher beliefs. This study, investigated how students' can benefit if mobile hand held technology is incorporated into their learning. The study further investigates how low socio economic students' manage this technological evolution. Peer reviewed journals were analysed to find out how mobile digital technology is improving students' academic achievement level in different parts of the world. This study looked at many peer reviewed journals, but 18 were chosen to be analysed. The journals releveled that incorporation of these technology into lessons improve student motivation, improves academic achievement, improves engagement, builds student – teacher relationship, technology is very easy to use, students' feel comfortable, enhances peer engagement and social media can be beneficial to education. On the other hand, journals also reveal that teacher beliefs needs to be changed, more professional development is needed for teachers, schools are restricting many useful websites as they are fearful, can bring digital divide, can be disruptive to students' and low socio economic students' can be left out. There is an urgent need to involve this technology into lessons as for many students' using these handheld mobile devices has become a daily part of life. Many parents also believe that these devices can help their children achieve improved academic results. Mobile learning motivates and improves student academic achievement level, however many schools around the world do not give students' full access to internet during school hours and many also ban some useful websites which can be very beneficial to student learning.

">

Comprehensive Review on Academic Achievement Levels through M-Learning

Anjay Lakhan *, Kumar Laxman**
*South Auckland School, New Zealand.
** Faculty of Education, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Periodicity:August - October'2019
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.13.2.15535

Abstract

Mobile learning is getting very popular in this 21st century due to advanced digital technology. Students' in the present day are growing up in a society which is immensely different compared to their teachers. Many educators are struggling to keep up with the modern evolution and there is a need to change teacher beliefs. This study, investigated how students' can benefit if mobile hand held technology is incorporated into their learning. The study further investigates how low socio economic students' manage this technological evolution. Peer reviewed journals were analysed to find out how mobile digital technology is improving students' academic achievement level in different parts of the world. This study looked at many peer reviewed journals, but 18 were chosen to be analysed. The journals releveled that incorporation of these technology into lessons improve student motivation, improves academic achievement, improves engagement, builds student – teacher relationship, technology is very easy to use, students' feel comfortable, enhances peer engagement and social media can be beneficial to education. On the other hand, journals also reveal that teacher beliefs needs to be changed, more professional development is needed for teachers, schools are restricting many useful websites as they are fearful, can bring digital divide, can be disruptive to students' and low socio economic students' can be left out. There is an urgent need to involve this technology into lessons as for many students' using these handheld mobile devices has become a daily part of life. Many parents also believe that these devices can help their children achieve improved academic results. Mobile learning motivates and improves student academic achievement level, however many schools around the world do not give students' full access to internet during school hours and many also ban some useful websites which can be very beneficial to student learning.

Keywords

Mobile Learning, Technology Enabled Learning, Student Achievement

How to Cite this Article?

Lakhan, A., and Laxman, K. (2019). Comprehensive Review on Academic Achievement Levels through M-Learning. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 13(2), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.13.2.15535

References

[1]. Abdo, M., & Semela, T. (2010). Teachers of poor communities: The tale of instructional media use in primary schools of Gedeo Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(7), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n7.7
[2]. Anderson, N. (2005). 'Mindstorms' and 'Mindtools' Aren't Happening: Digital streaming of students via socio-economic disadvantage. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(2), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.2.3
[3]. BBC News (2007). Keep Christmas gadgets 'at home'. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/ 7156326.stm
[4]. Beland, L. P., & Murphy, R. (2016). Ill Communication: Technology, distraction & student performance. Labour Economics, 41, 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco. 2016.04.004
[5]. Buckingham, D. (2007). Media education goes digital: An introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(2), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743988070 1343006
[6]. Domingo, M. G., & Gargante, A. B. (2016). Exploring the use of educational technology in primary education: Teachers' perceptions of mobile technology learning impacts and applications' use in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 21-28. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.023
[7]. Falloon, G. (2013). Young students using iPads: App design and content influences on their learning pathways. Computers & Education, 68, 505-521. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.006
[8]. Goodson, I., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Mangan, J. M. (2002). Cyber Spaces/Social Spaces: Culture Clash in Computerized Classrooms. Palgrave Macmillan.
[9]. Henderson, R., & Honan, E. (2008). Digital literacies in two low socioeconomic classrooms: Snapshots of practice. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 7(2), 85-98.
[10]. Keengwe, J., & Bhargava, M. (2014). Mobile learning and integration of mobile technologies in education. Education and Information Technologies, 19(4), 737-746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013- 9250-3
[11]. Lebens, M., Graff, M., & Mayer, P. (2009). Access, attitudes and the digital divide: Children's attitudes towards computers in a technology-rich environment. Educational Media International, 46(3), 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980903135467
[12]. Male, T., & Burden, K. (2014). Access denied? Twenty-first-century technology in schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(4), 423-437. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/1475939x.2013.864697
[13]. Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computers & Education, 68, 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.021
[14]. Mehdipour, Y., & Hamideh. (2013). Mobile learning for education: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, 3 (6), 93-101.
[15]. Nowell, S. D. (2014). Using disruptive technologies to make digital connections: Stories of media use and digital literacy in secondary classrooms. Educational Media International, 51(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2014.924661
[16]. Ozdamli, F., & Uzunboylu, H. (2014). M-learning adequacy and perceptions of students and teachers in secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/ bjet.12136
[17]. Thomas, K., & Orthober, C. (2011). Using textmessaging in the secondary classroom. American Secondary Education, 39(2), 55-76.
[18]. Thompson, M. (2008). ICT and development studies: Towards development 2.0. Journal of International Development, 20(6), 821-835. https://doi.org/10.1002/ jid.1498
[19]. Tien, F. F., & Tsu-Tan, F. (2006). The correlates of digital divide and their impact on college student learning. Computers and Education, 50(1), 421-36. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.07.005
[20]. Tongkaw, A. (2013). Multi perspective integrations information and communication technologies (ICTs) in higher education in developing countries: Case study Thailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1467-1472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.065
[21]. Volman, M., van Eck, E., Heemskerk, I., & Kuiper, E. (2004). New technologies, new differences. Gender and ethnic differences in pupils’ use of ICT in primary and secondary education. Computers & Education, 45(1), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.03.001
[22]. Wright, N. (2010). e-Learning and Implications for New Zealand schools: A Literature review. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.