The Native-Speaker Model in Japan: Failure, Success, or Cultural Manipulation?

Adam Crosby*
*Kobe City College of Nursing, Kobe, Japan.
Periodicity:October - December'2019


Although Japan spends vast amount of money every year on English education and Japanese university students study and are exposed to oral English for several years, there still persists a hesitance to use and speak English. This paper looks at educational policy in Japan and the adoption of the native-speaker model in Japan. Although the native-speaker model has been adopted in Japan and is considered prestigious, adopting a model that includes nonnative speakers of the outer circle nations would be motivational for Japanese learners of English. This paper signifies the misconception that the nativespeaker model is superior to the nonnative model.


Native-Speaker Model, Nonnative Speaker, JET Program, Nihonjinron.

How to Cite this Article?

Crosby, A. (2019). The Native-Speaker Model in Japan: Failure, Success, or Cultural Manipulation? i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 9(4), 1-4.


[1]. Amin, N. (1999). Minority women teachers of ESL: negotiating white English. In G Braine (Ed.), Non-native Educators in English Language Teaching (pp. 93-104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[2]. Befu, H. (1993). Nationalism and nihonjinron. In H. Befu (ed.). Cultural Nationalism in East Asia: Representation and Identity (pp. 107-135). Berkeley, CA: Institute of East Asian Studies.
[3]. Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16(6), 645-668.
[4]. Brumfit, C. (1982). English as an international language: What do we mean by “English”? In C. J Brumfit (Ed.), English for International Communication (pp. 1-8). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
[5]. Canagarajah, A. S. (1993). Critical ethnography of a Sri Lankan classroom: Ambiguities in student opposition to reproduction through ESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 601- 626.
[6]. Cheung, Y. L., Said, S. B., & Park, K. (Eds). (2015). Advances and Current Trends in Language Teacher Identity Research. London, England: Routledge.
[7]. Cook, V.J. (2002) Language teaching methodology and the L2 user in perspective. In Cook, V. J. (Ed.) Portraits of the L2 User (pp. 321-343). Clevedon: Multilingul Matters.
[8]. Dale, P.N. (1986). The Myth of Japanese Uniqueness. London: Routledge.
[9]. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8 (4), 777-795.
[10]. Fushino, K. (2010). Causal relationships between communication confidence, beliefs, about group work, and willingness to communicate in foreign language group work. TESOL Quar terly, 44(4), 700-744.
[11]. Goharimehr, N. (2017). Identity, motivation and English learning in a Japanese context. World Journal of English Language, 7(4), 18-30.
[12]. Honna, N. & Takeshita, Y. (2000) English language teaching for international Understanding in Japan. English Australia Journal, 18(1), 60-78.
[13]. Ivy, M. (1995). Discourses of the Vanishing: Modernity, Phantasm, Japan. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
[14]. JET Programme (2015). The Japan Exchange and Teaching Programme. Retrieved November. 23, 2018 from
[15]. Kachru, B. (1985). Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk and H. G. Widdowson (Eds.) English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures (pp. 11-30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[16]. Koike, I., & Tanaka, K. (1995). English in foreign language education policy in Japan. World Englishes 14(1), 13-25.
[17]. Kosaku, Y. (1992). Cultural Nationalism in Contemporary Japan: A Sociological Enquiry. New York: Routledge.
[18]. Kubota, R. (2002). The impact of globalization on language teaching in Japan. In D. Block and D. Cameron (Eds.) Globalization and Language Teaching (pp. 13-28). London: Routledge.
[19]. McConnell, D. L. (2000). Importing Diversity: Inside Japan's JET Program. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
[20]. Mercer, S. (2011). The beliefs of two expert EFL learners. The Language Learning Journal, 39(1), 57-74.
[21]. Norton. B. (1997). Language, identity, and the ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3). 409-429.
[22]. Osterman, G. L. (2014). Experiences of Japanese university students' willingness to speak English in class: A multiple case study. SAGE Open, 1-14.
[23] Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom. Language Learning, 60(4), 834-876.
[24]. Phillipson, R. (1992a). ELT: The native speaker's burden? ELT Journal, 46(1), 12-18. elt/46.1.12
[25]. Phillipson, R. (1992b). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[26]. Phillipson, R. (2001). English for globalisation or for the world's people? International Review of Education 47(3-4), 185-200.
[27]. Suzuki, T. (1995). Nihongowa Kokusaigo Ni Nariurka [Can the Japanese Language become an International Language?]. Tokyo: Kodsasha.
[28]. The English Effect. (2013). British Council. Retrieved from files/English-effect-report-v2.pdf#search='british+council+2013+PDF’
[29]. Trinder, R. (2013). Business students' belief about language learning in a university context. English for Specific Purposes, 32(1), 1-11. /j.esp.2012.06.003
[30]. Widdowson, H. G. (1996). Authenticity and autonomy in ELT. ELT Journal, 50(1), 67-68. elt/50.1.67

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article
Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.