Maximizing The Online Learning Experience: Suggestions For Educators And Students

Gina Cicco*
Assistant Professor, Counselor Education, St. John's University, New York.
Periodicity:June - August'2011
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.7.1.1513

Abstract

This article will discuss ways of maximizing the online course experience for teachers- and counselors-in-training. The widespread popularity of online instruction makes it a necessary learning experience for future teachers and counselors (Ash, 2011). New teachers and counselors take on the responsibility of preparing their students for real-life academic and professional experiences that will rely on communication through the Internet, social media, and virtual classrooms. To better prepare for these demands, they must be technologically literate and prepared to integrate technology, media, and differentiated pedagogies to deliver engaging lessons for students of various ages (Kelly, 2008). This article will examine the setup of the typical virtual classroom, and the ways that it can be modified to enhance student engagement, encourage collaboration among students, and provide diversified lessons to meet the needs of students with varied learning-style preferences. An example of a learning-style model will be presented to identify learning-style domains and profiles that may benefit from matching instructional strategies in online courses (Cicco, 2009; Rundle, 2006). The model will be discussed in connection with recent research studies indicating that specific pedagogical techniques utilized within the context of an online course can better accommodate individual learning needs and preferences while optimizing academic performance and overall student and faculty satisfaction. Suggestions for online educators include simple and clear presentation of course requirements, incorporating visual and auditory enhancements in lessons, using interactive course tools, and allowing for various assignment options (Cicco, 2009; Trepal, Haberstroh, Duffey, & Evans, 2007).

Keywords

Differentiated Instruction, Distance Learning, Learning Style, Online Course, Online Instruction, Pedagogical Techniques, Student Engagement, Virtual Classroom.

How to Cite this Article?

Cicco,G.(2011). Maximizing The Online Learning Experience: Suggestions For Educators And Students.i-manager’s Journal on School Education Technology, 7(1),1-6. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.7.1.1513

References

[1]. Aisami, R.S. (2007, December). Retention of online students. Online Classroom, 3-5.
[2]. Ash, K. (2011). Teachers make the move to the virtual world. Education Digest, 76(5), 32-34.
[3]. Beard, L.A., Harper, C., & Riley, G. (2004). Online versus on-campus instruction: Student attitudes & perceptions. Tech Trends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 48(6), 29-31.
[4.] Blackmore, C., Tantam, D., & Van Deurzen, E. (2008). Evaluation of e-learning outcomes: Experience from an online psychotherapy education programme. Open Learning, 23(3), 185-201.
[5]. Burke, K. (2000). A paradigm shift: Learning-styles implementation and preservice teachers. In R. Dunn & S.A. Griggs (Eds.), Practical approaches to using learning styles in higher education (pp. 85-94). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
[6]. Cicco, G. (2009). Online versus in-class courses: Learning-style assessment as an advisement tool. International Journal on E-Learning, 8(2), 161-173.
[7]. Drennan, J., Kennedy, J., & Pisarski, A. (2005). Factors affecting student attitudes toward flexible online learning in management education. Journal of Educational Research, 98(6), 331-338.
[8]. Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (2006). Dunn & Dunn Model – English. International Learning Styles Network.
[9]. Dunn, R., & Griggs, S.A. (Eds.). (2003). Synthesis of the Dunn and Dunn learning-style model research: Who, what, when, where, and so what? New York: St. John's University.
[10]. Fearing, A., & Riley, M. (2005). Graduate students' perceptions of online teaching and relationship to preferred learning styles. MEDSURG Nursing, 14(6), 383- 389.
[11]. Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in Web-based instruction. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 39(2),153-162.
[12]. Kelly, R. (2008, September). Tips from the pros. Online Classroom, 1-8.
[13]. McArthur, R.C. (2005). Faculty-based advising: An important factor in community college retention. Community College Review, 32(4), 1-19.
[14]. Meyers, S.A. (2008). Using transformative pedagogy when teaching online. College Teaching, 56(4), 219-224.
[15]. Rundle, S.M. (2006). An introduction to the Building Excellence Survey. Pittsford, NY: Performance Concepts International.
[16]. Scheuermann, M. (2010, January). Engaging students with synchronous methods in online courses. Online Classroom, 1-8.
[17]. Trepal, H., Haberstroh, S., Duffey, T., & Evans, M. (2007). Considerations and strategies for teaching online counseling skills: Establishing relationships in cyberspace. Counselor Education & Supervision, 46(4), 266-279.
[18]. Yang, Y.C., & Chou, H. (2008). Beyond critical thinking skills: Investigating the relationship between critical thinking skills and dispositions through different online instructional strategies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 666-684.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.