Communication Negotiation Strategies of Senior High School English Teachers with Students Using Online Resources

Kamille C. Salazar*, Camilla J. Vizconde**
* Undergraduate, Department of English Language Studies (ELS), University of Santo Tomas, Philippines.
** Professor and Chairperson, Department of English, University of Santo Tomas, Philippines.
Periodicity:October - December'2018
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.8.4.14901

Abstract

The senior high school curriculum has only been implemented recently by the Department of Education in the Philippines; therefore studies delving into teaching and learning in these levels are very limited including the negotiations of teachers with students through online resources. Using Goldwich's (2009) framework as guide, the negotiations of the teachers were determined through interviews, where five English teachers express how they negotiated and how the use of the online resources help in the development of the linguistic competence of students in learning of the English language. The study also looked into the perspectives of the teachers towards the use of technology in their instruction following Davis’ (1989) Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). After the narratives of the teachers, three themes referring to the negotiation strategies were articulated in this study: snug, simple, and systematic. Snug referred to the teachers' strategies in preparation for the tasks; simplicity referred to the clarity and brevity of the teachers' strategies; and systematic referred to strategies that are logical and procedural enabling students to follow the teachers' instructions. After evaluating the use of technology in their instruction, the teachers' statements show that the linguistic competence of the students are developed through the constant exposure they have with the activities they conduct online and the tasks they need to accomplish.

Keywords

K-12, Blended learning, Negotiation Strategies, Technology Acceptance Model, Senior High School English Teachers, Online Resources, Linguistic Competence

How to Cite this Article?

Salazar, K. C., and Vizconde, C. J. (2018). Communication Negotiation Strategies of Senior High School English Teachers with Students Using Online Resources. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 8(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.8.4.14901

References

[1]. Adria, M., & Woudstra, A. (2001). Who's on the line? Managing student interactions in distance education using a one-window approach. Open Learning, 16(3), 249-261.
[2]. Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. M. (2011). Exploring the potential of the will, skill, tool model in Ghana: Predicting prospective and practicing teachers' use of technology. Computers & Education, 56(1), 91-100.
[3]. Bagarić, V., & Djigunović, J. M. (2007). Defining Communicative Competence. Metodika, 8(1), 94-103.
[4]. Baker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough?: Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research.
[5]. Bangkok, E. P. (2014). Education Systems in ASEAN+6 Countries: A comparative analysis of selected educational issues. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/ images/0022/002267/226757E.pdf
[6]. Blackboard. (n.d.). About Blackboard. Retrieved from https://www.blackboard.com/about-us/index.html
[7]. Bonifacio, A. (n.d.). Developing Information Communication Technology (ICT) Curriculum Standards for K-12 Schools in the Philippines. Retrieved from https://mafiadoc.com/ict-curriculum-standards-for-k-12- schools-in-the-philippines_59e02dd21723dd1a56a7 4f87.html
[8]. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
[9]. Cavanaugh, C., Gillan, K. J., Kromrey, J., Hess, M., & Blomeyer, R. (2004). The Effects of Distance Education on K–12 Student Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Learning Point Associates.
[10]. Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. In E. A. Soler, & M. S. Jordà (Eds.), Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning (pp. 41-57). Springer.
[11]. Clark, R., & Kazinou, M. (2001). Promoting Metacognitive Skills among Graduate Students in Education. Retrieved from http:// et.sdsu.edu/RClark/ET640/ RCMKPOPS2.htm
[12]. Dabbagh, N. (2003). Scaffolding: An important teacher competency in online learning. TechTrends, 47(2), 39-44.
[13]. Davidson, A. L., Schofield, J., & Stocks, J. (2001). Professional cultures and collaborative efforts: A case study of technologists and educators working for change. The Information Society, 17(1), 21-32.
[14]. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
[15]. Department of Education and SEAMEO INNOTECH. (2012). K to 12 in Southeast Asia: Regional Comparison the Structure, Content, Organization and Adequacy of Basic Education. Quezon City: Philippines.
[16]. DiPietro, M., Ferdig, R. E., Black, E. W., & Preston, M. (2010). Best practices in teaching K-12 online: Lessons learned from Michigan virtual school teachers. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(3), 10-35.
[17]. Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51(1), 187-199.
[18]. Espasa, A., & Meneses, J. (2010). Analysing feedback processes in an online teaching and learning environment: An exploratory study. Higher Education, 59(3), 277-292.
[19]. Fatima, S. S., Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (2001, August). Optimal negotiation strategies for agents with incomplete information. In International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (pp. 377- 392). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[20]. Firmin, M. W., & Genesi, D. J. (2013, October). History and implementation of classroom technology. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93(21), 1603-1617.
[21]. Ganesan, S. (1993). Negotiation strategies and the nature of channel relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(2), 183-203.
[22]. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
[23]. Gibson, W. (2009). Negotiating textual talk: conversation analysis, pedagogy and the organisation of online asynchronous discourse. British Educational Research Journal, 35(5), 705-721.
[24]. Goldwich, D. (2009, June 13). Be an effective negotiator. The New Straits Times.
[25]. Guenaneche, H. C., & Radigales, F. G. (2007). Elearning platforms. Moodle and Dokeos. Communication Software Laboratory Academic Year, 2008. Retrieved from http://www.it.uc3m.es/rueda/lsfc/trabajos/curso07-08/Elearning% 20platforms-HomeroCanales-Fernando Garcia.pdf
[26]. Harms, C. M., Niederhauser, D. S., Davis, N. E., Roblyer, M. D., & Gilbert, S. B. (2006). Educating educators for virtual schooling: Communicating roles and responsibilities. Journal of Communication, 16(1), 17-24.
[27]. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.
[28]. Hull, D. M., & Saxon, T. F. (2009). Negotiation of meaning and co-construction of knowledge: An experimental analysis of asynchronous online instruction. Computers & Education, 52(3), 624-639.
[29]. Hymes, D. H. (1972). On Communicative Competence. In J. B. Pride and J. Holmes (Eds), Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
[30]. Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1-14.
[31]. Kurcz, I. (2004). Communicative competence and theor y of mind. Psychology of Language and Communication, 8(2), 5-18.
[32]. Larreamendy-Joerns, J., & Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the distance with online education. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 567-605.
[33]. Lu, L. L., & Jeng, I. (2006). Knowledge construction in inservice teacher online discourse: Impacts of instructor roles and facilitative strategies. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 183-202.
[34]. Luan, W. S., & Teo, T. (2009). Investigating the technology acceptance among student teachers in Malaysia: An application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(2), 261-272.
[35]. Lyster, R. (2002). Negotiation in immersion teacher–student interaction. International Journal of Education Research, 37(3-4), 237-253.
[36]. Ma, W. W., Andersson, R., & Streith, K. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: An empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(6), 387-395.
[37]. Matos, N., Sierra, C., & Jennings, N. R. (1998, July). Determining successful negotiation strategies: An evolutionary approach. In Multi Agent Systems, 1998. Proceedings. International Conference on (pp. 182-189). IEEE.
[38]. Means, B. & Olson, K. (1995). Technology's Role within Constructivist Classrooms. SRI International, Menlo Park, Calif.
[39]. Means, B., Penuel, W., & Padilla, C. (2001). The Connected School: Technology and Learning in High School. San Francisco, C.A.:Jossey-Bass.
[40]. Musa, F., Mansor, A. Z., Mufti, N., Abdullah, N. A., & Kasim, F. D. (2012). Negotiation skills: Teachers' feedback as input strategy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 221-226.
[41]. Nicol, J. D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and selfregulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
[42]. Perdue, B. C., & Summers, J. O. (1991). Purchasing agents' use of negotiation strategies. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(2), 175-189.
[43]. Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76-101.
[44]. Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching with Technology: Creating Student-Centered Classrooms. New York: Teachers College.
[45]. Sarvi, J., Munger, F., & Pillay, H. (2015). Transitions to K- 12 Education Systems: Experiences from Five Case Countries. Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/177761/ transitions-k12-education.pdf.
[46]. Selman, R. L., & Demorest, A. P. (1983). Observing troubled children's interpersonal negotiation strategies: Implications of and for a developmental model. Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, (pp. 2-45). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED233815.pdf
[47]. Selman, R. L., Beardslee, W., Schultz, L. H., Krupa, M., & Podorefsky, D. (1986). Assessing adolescent interpersonal negotiation strategies: Toward the integration of structural and functional models. Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 450-459.
[48]. The CEO Forum. (2011). Education Technology Mist Be Included in Comprehensive Education Legislation. A Policy Paper by the CEO Forum on Education and Technology.
[49]. Thieman, G. Y. (2016). Using technology as a tool for learning and developing 21st century citizenship skills: An examination of the nets and technology use by preservice teachers with their K-12 students. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education (CITE Journal), 8(4), 342-366.
[50]. Tondeur, J., Braak, J. V., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2011). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 1- 11.
[51]. Williams P., & Hellman C. (2004). Differences in selfregulation for online learning between first-and secondgeneration college students. Research in Higher Education, 45(1), 71-82.
[52]. Yu, W. K., Sun, Y. C., & Chang, Y. J. (2010). When technology speaks language: An evaluation of course management systems used in a language learning context. ReCALL, 22(3), 332-355.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.