Analysis of Group Mobility and File Mobility Model for Routing Protocols in MANET Using Netsim

Rajat Khurana*, Gurpreet Singh **, Monika Sachdeva ***
* PG Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IK Gujral Punjab Technical University Main Campus, Kapurthala, Punjab, India.
** Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Guru Nanak Dev University Regional Campus Sultanpur Lodhi, Kapurthala, Punjab, India.
***Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IK Gujral Punjab Technical University Main Campus, Kapurthala, Punjab, India.
Periodicity:March - May'2018
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jit.7.2.14645

Abstract

As the demand for wireless communications has increased, Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) have acquired their own analysis locations. Due to its rapidly changing technology, the potential application of MANET is expanding. The wireless network can be established in two modes: "Ad hoc mode" where the nodes are self-organizing, and the other is the basic mode where the nodes are controlled by the central coordinator. However, routing plays an important role in the more complex process of MANET and requires considerable attention. In order to deal with this situation, different solutions have been proposed in the literature. Analysis of different mobility models such as group mobility and file mobility is done. This paper attempts to evaluate the performance of the Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) Protocol, Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) and Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) having different node density using NetSim Simulator. Different Performance metrics such as Throughput, Packets Delivered, Packets Collided and Packets Errored have been measured, and the comparative results are also presented in this paper.

Keywords

MANET, DSR, OLSR, Wireless, NetSim.

How to Cite this Article?

Khurana,R., Singh,G., and Sachdeva,M. (2018). Analysis of Group Mobility and File Mobility Model for Routing Protocols in Manet Using NETSIM. i-manager’s Journal on Information Technology, 7(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.26634/jit.7.2.14645

References

[1]. Biradar, S. R., Sarma, H. H., Sharma, K., Sarkar, S. K., & Puttamadappa, C. (2009). Performance comparison of reactive routing protocols of MANETs using group mobility model. In 2009 International Conference on Signal Processing Systems (pp. 192-195). IEEE.
[2]. Brahma, M., Kim, K. W., Abouaissa, A., & Lorenz, P. (2005). A load-balancing and push-out scheme for supporting QOS in MANETs. Telecommunication Systems, 30(1-3), 161-175.
[3]. Buruhanudeen, S., Othman, M., & Ali, B. M. (2007). Existing MANET routing protocols and metrics used towards the efficiency and reliability-an overview. In Telecommunications and Malaysia International Conference on Communications, 2007. ICT-MICC 2007. IEEE International Conference on (pp. 231-236). IEEE.
[4]. Camp, T., Boleng, J., & Davies, V. (2002). A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2(5), 483-502.
[5]. Chakrabarti, G., & Kulkarni, S. (2006). Load balancing and resource reservation in mobile ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 4(2), 186-203.
[6]. Devarapalli, V., & Sidhu, D. (2001). MZR: A multicast protocol for mobile ad hoc networks. In Communications, 2001. ICC 2001. IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 3, pp. 886-891). IEEE.
[7]. Haas, Z. J., Pearlman, M. R., & Samar, P. (2002). The Bordercast Resolution Protocol (BRP) for ad hoc networks. IETF, MANET Internet Draft, 13801-14853.
[8]. IDC Online (2011). Performance Evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.idconline.com/technical_ references/
[9]. Nayak, P., & Sinha, P. (2015). Analysis of random way point and random walk mobility model for reactive routing protocols for MANET using NetSim simulator. In Artificial Intelligence, Modelling and Simulation (AIMS), rd 2015 3 International Conference on (pp. 427-432). IEEE.
[10]. Singh, G., & Khurana, R. (2017). Performance Evaluation of DSR, OLSR and ZRP using NetSim Simulator. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8(3), 346-349.
[11]. Singla, V., & Kakkar, P. (2010). Traffic Pattern based performance comparison of Reactive and Proactive protocols of Mobile Ad-hoc Networks. International Journal of Computer Applications, 5(10), 16-20.
[12]. Topalis, E., Giannoulis, S., Antonopoulos, C., & Koubias, S. (2005). Zrp Versus DSR and TORA: A th Compressive Survey on ZRP Performance. In 10 IEEE Conference, ETFA (Vol. 1).
[13]. Wikipedia. (2010). What is Optimized Link State routing, [Online]. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Optimized_Link_State_Routing_Protocol
[14]. Zhang, B., & Mouftah, H. T. (2005). QoS routing for wireless ad hoc networks: Problems, algorithms, and protocols. IEEE Communications Magazine, 43(10), 110- 117.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.