i-manager Publications

An Examination of Parent Mediated Strategies during a Joint Routine

Sekhar Pindiprolu *, Teresa Boggs**

* Professor, Special Education Program, The University of Toledo, USA

** Director of Clinical Services, Speech-Language Pathology Program, East Tennessee State University, USA.

Periodicity:August - October'2018
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.12.2.14643

Abstract

Children with speech and language delays are at a high risk for future reading difficulties (Al Otaiba & Smartt, 2003). Hence, it is vital to identify effective language interventions for children with language delays that can be embedded in their daily routines. This study examined the effects parental use of language strategies (i.e., praise, expansions, pause, and open-ended questions) on the language skills of children with language delays during a natural routine. The primary purpose of the study was to examine parental acquisition and use of praise, comments, expansions, pauses, and openended questions in the context of joint television viewing. The secondary purpose was to evaluate the effects of the strategies on the child's initiations, responses, vocabulary, and mean length of utterance. Further, parental satisfaction with the intervention strategies was examined. The results indicated that parental use of strategies increased after the intervention and both children increased their (a) initiations, (b) responses to parental comments and questions, (c) vocabulary, and (d) mean length of utterance. Further, both parents perceived that the strategies were useful and effective in promoting their child's language. The results of the study and contributions to the literature are discussed.

Keywords

Parent Mediated Strategies, Joint TV Viewing, Expressive Language Delays. Naturalistic routines, Language Intervention Strategies.

How to Cite this Article?

Pindiprolu, S., & Boggs, T. (2018). An Examination of Parent Mediated Strategies during a Joint Routinei-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 12(2), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.12.2.14643

References

[1]. Al Otaiba, A., & Smartt, S. M. (2003). Sound summer camp: Involving parents in early literacy intervention for children with speech and language delays. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(3), 30-34.

[2]. Bernheimer, L. P., & Keogh, B. K. (1995). Weaving interventions into the fabric of everyday life: An approach to family assessment. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15(4), 415-433.

[3]. Brownell, R. (2000a). Expressive One-word Picture Vocabulary Test (Rev. ed). Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.

[4]. Brownell, R. (2000b). Receptive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (3^rd Ed.). Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.

[5]. Catts, H. W., & Hogan, T. (2003). Language basis of reading disabilities and implications for early identification and remediation. Reading Psychology, 24(3-4), 223-246.

[6]. Chai, A. Y., Zhang, C., & Bisberg, M. (2006). Rethinking natural environment practice: Implications from examining various interpretations and approaches. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(3), 203-208.

[7]. De Decker, E., De Craemer, M., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Wijndaele, K., Duvinage, K., Koletzko, B., ... & Zych, K. (2012). Influencing factors of screen time in preschool children: An exploration of parents' perceptions through focus groups in six European countries. Obesity Reviews, 13(1), 75-84.

[8]. Diken, O (2014). Pragmatic language skills of children with developmental disabilities: A descriptive and relational study in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 55, 109-122.

[9]. Gallimore, R., Goldenberg, C., & Weisner, T. S. (1993). The social construction and subjective reality of activity settings: Implications for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21(4), 537- 559.

[10]. Kaiser, A. P., & Roberts, M. Y. (2011). Advances in early communication and language intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(4), 298-309.

[11]. McCathren, R. B., Yoder, P. J., & Warren, S. F. (1999). Prelinguistic pragmatic functions as predictors of later expressive vocabulary. Journal of Early Intervention, 22(3), 205-216.

[12]. McNeill, J. H., & Fowler, S. A. (1999). Let's talk: Encouraging mother-child conversations during story reading. Journal of Early Intervention, 22(1), 51-69.

[13]. Nelson, H. D., Nygren, P., Walker, M., & Panoscha, R. (2006). Screening for speech and language delays in preschool children: Systematic evidence review for the US preventive services task force. Pediatrics,117(6), 298-319.

[14]. Prelock, P. A., Hutchins, T., & Glascoe, F. P. (2008). Speech-language impairment: How to identify the most common and least diagnosed disability of childhood. The Medscape Journal of Medicine, 10(6), 136.

[15]. Rideout, V. J., Vandewater, E. A., Wartella, E. A. (2003). Zero to six: Electronic media in the lives of infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. A Kaiser Family Foundation Report. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED482302.pdf

[16]. Rideout, V., & Hamel, E. (2006). The media family: Electronic media in the lives of infants, toddlers, preschoolers and their parents. CA: The Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation.

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25

An Examination of Parent Mediated Strategies during a Joint Routine

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content: