Time Matters: Proactive vs. Reactive FOF

Arshya Keyvanfar*, Naeimeh Bakshiri**
*-** Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Iran .
Periodicity:April - June'2011
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.1.2.1457

Abstract

Recently ELT has witnessed the debate between the proponents of non-interventionist and interventionist views towards SLA. The former, also known as zero option, sees L2 acquisition as an incidental process leaving no role for instruction (Krashen, 1981; Prbhu, 1987), while the latter considers instruction effective and even crucial for some learner types (i.e., adults and EFL learners with insufficient L2 exposure), some grammatical structures, and achieving higher levels of grammatical accuracy (Dekeyser, 2000; Doughty, 2003). Research has shown that instruction does facilitate the process of L2 learning, especially when juxtaposed with high amounts of exposure (Ellis, 2006). Consequently, different versions of form-focused instruction (FFI) are being practiced despite the fashionable meaning-focused instruction (MFI) of the communicative era. Nevertheless, a question still remains: “when is the time to intervene?” The present research targeting this very question compared the efficacy of proactive and reactive FOF on the grammar improvement of 88 Iranian EFL learners at two proficiency levels of beginner and upper-intermediate. The results indicated that regardless of the proficiency level, proactive FOF was more effective on the grammar improvement of the participants when compared to reactive FOF. The researchers strongly believe that in EFL settings like Iran with minimum amount of exposure, planned grammar instruction is a necessity.

Keywords

Grammar Teaching, Proactive FOF, Reactive FOF, EFL Setting.

How to Cite this Article?

Keyvanfar, A., and Bakshiri, N. (2011). Time Matters: Proactive Vs. Reactive FOF. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 1(2), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.1.2.1457

References

[1]. Bourke, J. M. (2008). A rough guide to language awareness. English Teaching Forum, 1, 12-28.
[2]. Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis. R (2002). Metalanguage in focus on form in the communicative classroom. Language Awareness, 11, 1-13.
[3]. Dekeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499-533.
[4]. Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: constrains, compensation and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The hand book of second language acquisition. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
[5]. Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[6]. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom language acquisition. UK: Cambridge University Press.
[7]. Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: How explicit knowledge affects implicit language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–352.
[8]. Ellis, R. (2006). The study of second language acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.
[9]. Ellis, R. (2002). Teaching grammar-practice or consciousness-raising. In J. C. Richards. & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: an anthology of current practice (pp. 167-174). UK: Cambridge University Press.
[10]. Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. In R. Ellis (Ed.) Form-Focused Instruction and Second Language Learning (pp. 1-46). Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
[11]. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Disentangling focus on form. A response to Sheen and O' Neill (2005). Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 135-141.
[12]. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2002). Doing focus-on-form. System, 30, 419-432.
[13]. Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford; Pergamon.
[14]. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. De Bot, R. Ginsberg & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
[15]. Long, M. H. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: multiple perspectives. New York: Newbury House.
[16]. Long,M. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of the research. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 359-382.
[17]. Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom language acquisition. UK: Cambridge University Press.
[18]. Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
[19]. Lyster, R. (1994). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on the aspect of French immersion students' sociolinguistics competence. Applied linguistics 15, 263-87.
[20]. Mennim, P. (2003). Rehearsed oral L2 output and reactive focus on form. ELT Journal, 57,130-138.
[21]. Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2007). Issues in form focus instruction and teacher's education. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Issue in form focused instruction and teacher's education: Studies in honor of Rod Ellis. New York: Oxford University Press.
[22]. Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
[23]. Prabhu, N.S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[24]. Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W.A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. UK: Cambridge University Press.
[25]. Spada, N. (2010). Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present, and future research. Plenary speech. Cambridge University Press.
[26]. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching 30, 73?87.
[27]. Thournbury, S. (2000). How to teach grammar. London: Longman.
[28]. Thournbury, S. (2004). English teaching essential grammar. English Teaching Professionals, 30, 40-41.
[29]. VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495-510.
[30]. White, L. (1998). Getting learners' attention: a typological input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. UK: Cambridge University Press.
[31]. White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133-61.
[32]. Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.