References
[1]. Browder, D.M., Mims, P.J., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell,
L., & Lee, A. (2008). Teaching elementary students with
multiple disabilities to participate in shared stories.
Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities,
33(1-2), 3-12.
[2]. Center for Applied Special Education Technology
[CAST]. (1998). What is universal design for learning?
Wakefield, MA: Author. Retrieved July 31, 2009, from
http://www.cast.org/research/udl/index.html.Individuals
with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. 20
U.S.C. 144 et seq. (2004).
[3]. Johnson, L.S. (2008). Relationship of instructional
methods to student engagement in two public high
schools. American secondary education, 36(2), 69-87.
[4]. Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs:
Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York:
Oxford.
[5]. Kennedy, C. (2005). Single-case designs for
educational research. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
[6]. Kochhar-Bryant, C.A., & Bassett, D.S. (2002). Aligning
transition and standards-based education: Issues and
strategies. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
[7]. Kortering, L.J., McClannon, T.W., & Braziel, P.M. (2008).
Universal design for learning: A look at what algebra and
biology students with and without high incidence
conditions are saying. Remedial and Special Education,
29(6), 352-363.
[8]. Meo, G. (2008). Curriculum planning for all learners:
Applying universal design for learning in a high-school
reading comprehension program. Preventing School
Failure, 52(1).
[9]. Mithaug, D., Wehmeyer, M. L., Agran, M., Martin, J. E.,
& Palmer, S. (1998). The self-determined learning model of instruction: Engaging students to solve their learning problems. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. No Child Left Behind
Act of 2001. Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
[10]. Richards, Taylor, Ramasamy, & Richards (1998).
Single subject research: Applications in Educational and
clinical settings. Belmont: Wadsworth Group/Thomson
Learning.
[11]. Rose, D. H. & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every
student in a digital age: Universal design for learning.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development.
[12]. Strangman, N., Meyer, A., Hall, T., & Proctor, P. (2008).
Improving foreign language instruction with new
technologies and universal design for learning. In E.
Hamilton, & T. Barbieri, (Eds.), Worlds apart: Disability and
foreign language learning. New Haven, CT: Yale University
Press.
[13]. Test, D.W., Fowler, C.H., Richter, S.M., White, J.,
Mazzotti, V., Walker, A.R., Kohler, P. & Kortering, L. (2009).
Evidence-based practices in secondary transition.
Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(2),
115-128.
[14]. Thoma, C.A., Bartholomew, C., & Scott, L.A. (2009).
Universal design for transition: A roadmap for planning
and instruction. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
[15]. Thoma, C.A., Pannozzo, G., & Achola, E. (in
production). IEP goals for students with disabilities: A
secondary analysis of data from the NLTS-2 study.
[16]. Wehman, P. (2006). Life Beyond the Classroom:
Transition Strategies for Young People with Disabilities, (4th
edition), Paul Brookes Publishing Co.
[17]. Wehmeyer, M.L. (2006). Universal design for learning,
access to the general education curriculum and students
with mild mental retardation. Exceptionality, 14(4), 225-
235.
