i-manager Publications

Discrimination Between Burr Type X Distribution Versus Log – Logistic and Weibull - Exponential Distributions

M. S. Ravikumar*, R. R. L. Kantam**

* Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Konaseema Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Foundation/ General Hospital, Amalapuram, Andhra Pradesh, India.

** Former Professor, Department of Statistics, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Nagarjunanagar, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Periodicity:October - December'2017
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jmat.6.4.13864

Abstract

The well known Burr type X distribution is considered as a null population. Log-logistic and Weibull-Exponential (Dubey - 1966) distributions are taken as alternative populations. Two test statistics based on population quantiles, Likelihood Ratio (LR) type criteria are suggested to discriminate between the considered null and alternative populations. The percentiles of the proposed test statistics are evaluated. The performance of the test procedures are compared through the respective values of computed power functions.

Keywords

Burr type X Distribution, Log-logistic Distribution, Weibull- Exponential Distribution, Order Statistics, Population Quantiles, Likelihood Ratio Type Criterion, Power Function

How to Cite this Article?

Ravikumar, M.S., Kantam, R.R.L. (2017). Discrimination Between Burr Type X Distribution Versus Log – Logistic and Weibull - Exponential Distributions. i-manager’s Journal on Mathematics, 6(4), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmat.6.4.13864

References

[1]. Burr, I. W. (1942). Cumulative frequency functions. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 13(2), 215-232.

[2]. Dey, A. K. & Kundu, D. (2009a). Discriminating among the log-normal, weibull, and generalized exponential distributions. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 58(3), 416-424.

[3]. Dey, A. K. & Kundu, D. (2009b). Discriminating between the log-normal and log-logistic distributions. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 39(2), 280-292.

[4]. Dey, A. K. & Kundu, D. (2012a). Discriminating between the bivariate generalized exponential and bivariate Weibull distributions. Chilean Journal of Statistics (ChJS), 3(1).

[5]. Dey, A. K. & Kundu, D. (2012b). Discriminating between the Weibull and log-normal distributions for Type-II censored data. Statistics, 46(2), 197-214.

[6]. Dubey, S. D. (1966). Transformations for Estimation of Parameters. Journal of Indian Statistical Association, 4(3 and 4), 109-124.

[7]. Gupta, R. D. & Kundu, D. (2004). Discriminating between gamma and generalized exponential distributions. Journal of Statistical Computation & Simulation, 74(2), 107-121.

[8]. Gupta, R. D. & Kundu, D. (2003a). Closeness of gamma and generalized exponential distribution. Communications in Statistics-Ttheory and Methods, 32(4), 705-721.

[9]. Gupta, R. D. & Kundu, D. (2003b). Discriminating between Weibull and generalized exponential distributions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 43(2), 179-196.

[10]. Gupta, R. D. & Kundu, D. (2006). On the comparison of Fisher information of the Weibull and GE distributions. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 136(9), 3130-3144.

[11]. Gupta, R. D., Kundu, D., & Manglick, A. (2002). Probability of correct selection of gamma versus GE or Weibull versus GE based on likelihood ratio statistic. In Recent Advances in Statistical Methods (pp. 147-156).

[12]. Kantam, R. R. L., Priya, M. C., & Ravikumar, M. S. (2014). Discrimination between linear failure rate distribution and Rayleigh distribution. Journal of Reliability and Statistical Studies, 7, 9-17.

[13]. Kundu, D. (2005). Discriminating between the normal and Laplace distributions. In Balakrishnan, N., Nagaraja, H. N., & Kannan, N. (Eds.) Advances in Ranking and Selection, Multiple Comparisons, and Reliability (PP. 65-78), Birkhauser, Boston.

[14]. Kundu, D. & Manglick, A. (2005). Discriminating between the log-normal and gamma distributions. Journal of the Applied Statistical Sciences, 14, 175-187.

[15]. Kundu, D., & Raqab, M. Z. (2007). Discriminating between the generalized Rayleigh and log-normal distribution. Statistics, 41(6), 505-515.

[16]. Kundu, D., Gupta, R. D., & Manglick, A. (2005). Discriminating between the log-normal and generalized exponential distributions. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 127(1), 213-227.

[17]. Srinivasa Rao, B. & Kantam, R. R. L. (2014). Discriminating between log-logistic and rayleigh distributions. Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, 10(1), 1-7.

[18]. Srinivasa Rao, B. & Kantam, R. R. L. (2013). Acceptance sampling plans for percentiles of half logistic distribution. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 20(05), 1350016.

[19]. Srinivasa Rao, G. & Kantam, R. R. L. (2012). Two-stage Estimation In Log-logistic Model. Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 28(3), 331-339.

[20]. Sultan, K. S. (2007). Order statistics from the generalized exponential distribution and applications. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 36(7), 1409-1418.

Discrimination Between Burr Type X Distribution Versus Log – Logistic and Weibull - Exponential Distributions

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content:

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25