References
[1]. Ackerman, M. S. (2000). Intellectual challenge of
CSCW: The gap between social requirements and
technical feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2-
3), 179-203.
[2]. Barbour, R. (2008). Introducing Qualitative Research: A
Student Guide to the Craft of Doing Qualitative Research.
London: Sage.
[3]. Barnett, J. (2006). Implementation of personal
response units in very large lecture classes: Student
perceptions. Australasian Journal of Educational
Technology, 22(4), 474-494.
[4]. Bold, M. (2006). Use of wikis in graduate course work.
Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(1), 5-14.
[6]. Chu, S. K. W., & Kennedy, D.M. (2011). Using online
collaborative tools for groups to co-construct knowledge.
Online Information Review, 35(4), 581-597.
[7]. Cross, N., & Cross, A. (1995). Observations of teamwork
and social processes in design. Design Studies, 16(1), 143-
170.
[8]. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in
brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1),
497–509
[9]. Dourish, P., & Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and
Coordination in Shared Workspaces. In Proceedings of the
Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work
CSCW 1992, ACM Press, New York, 107-114.
[10]. Gleeson, E. J. (1996). Common Ground: An
Experiment in the Teaching of Generic Skills for Design
Students. In Proceedings of the 3rd National Conference,
Product Design Education, University of Lancashire.
[11]. Graham, C. R., Tripp, T. R., Seawright, L., & Joeckel, G.
L. (2007). Empowering or compelling reluctant
participators using audience response systems. Active
Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), 233-258.
[12]. Hara, N., & Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content
analyses of on-line discussion in an applied educational
psychology course. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115-152.
[13]. Hoekstra, A. (2008). Vibrant student voices: Exploring
effects of the use of clickers in large college courses.
Learning, Media, and Technology, 33(4), 329-341.
[14]. Hilliges, O. (2007, October). Informed Browsing:
Scaling up Co-Experienced Access to Digital Media. In
Adjunct Proceedings (Doctoral Symposium) of the 20th
ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and
Technology (UIST'07), Newport, RI, USA.
[15]. Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt G. (2011). Are
digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of
digital technologies. Computers and Education, 56(2), 429-440.
[16]. Misanchuk, M., & Anderson, T. (2001). Building
community in an online learning environment:
Communication, cooperation and collaboration.
Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Mid-South Instructional
Technology Conference, Murfreesboro, Middle Tennessee
State University.
[17]. Murugesan, S. (2007). Understanding Web 2.0. IT
Professional, 9(1), 34-41.
[18]. Nidamarthi, S., Allen R. H., & Sriram, R. D. (2001).
Observations from supplementing the traditional design
process via Internet-based collaboration tools.
International Journal of Computer Integrated
Manufacturing, 14(1), 95-107.
[19]. Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support
of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review,
19(1), 65–83.
[20]. Su, J., Gorse, K., Ramirez, F., & Fox, M. A. (2010).
Collagen XIX is expressed by interneurons and contributes to the formation of hippocampal synapses. Journal of
Comparative Neurology, 518(2), 229–253.
[21]. Tang, J. C. (1989). Listing, Drawing, and Gesturing in
Design: A Study of the Use of Shared Workspaces by Design
Teams (Unpublished PhD Thesis, Department of
Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, USA).
[22]. Vaughan, N., Nickle, T., Silovs, J., & Zimmer, J. (2011).
Moving to their Own Beat: Exploring how Students use Web
2.0 Technologies to Support Group Work Outside of Class
Time. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10(3), 113-127.
[23]. Wang, Q. (2012). Using online shared workspaces to
support group collaborative learning. Computers and
Education, 55(3), 1270-1276.
[24]. Witney, D., & Smallbone, T. (2011). Wiki work: Can
using wikis enhance student collaboration for group
assignment tasks? Innovations in Education and Teaching
International, 48(1), 101-110.