References
[1]. Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers' attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case
of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47(4), 373-
398. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.
2004.10.013
[2]. Ali, H. O. (2010). Administrators', teachers' and students'
perceptions about the benefits of and barriers to TELL at
Koya University. (Unpublished MA Thesis, Bilkent University,
Ankara).
[3]. Altin, H. M. (2014). Ögrenci, Ögretmen, Yönetici ve Veli
Bakis Açisiyla FATIH Projesinin Incelenmesi [Investigation of
Fatih Project based on the perceptions of students,
teachers, school administrators and parents] (Unpublished
Master's Thesis, Baskent University, Ankara.)
[4]. Ates, M., Çerçi, A., & Derman, S. (2015). Content
analysis of Turkish course videos in educational informatics
network. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(3),
105–117.
[5]. Aydin, S. (2013). Teachers' perceptions about the use of
computers in EFL teaching and learning: The case of Turkey.
Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 214-233,
DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2012.654495
[6]. Bagci, H. (2013). Fatih projesi çerçevesinde
ortaögretim ögrencilerinin etkilesimli tahtaya yönelik
görüslerinin incelenmesi [In favour of Faith project: Review
of students opinions related to smart boards] (Unpublished
Master's Thesis). Okan University, Istanbul.
[7]. Bax, S. (2003). CALL-past, present and future. System,
31(1), 13-28.
[8]. Bax, S. (2011). Normalisation revisited: The effective use
of technology in language education. International
Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and
Teaching (IJCALLT), 1(2), 1-15.
[9]. Blake, C. (2009). Potential of Text - Based Internet Chats
for Improving Oral Fluency in a Second Language. The
Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 227-240.
[10]. Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing
teachers' adoption and integration of information and
communication technology into teaching: A review of the
literature. International Journal of Education and
Development using Information and Communication
Technology (IJEDICT), 8(1), 136–155.
[11]. Chapelle, C. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in
search of research paradigms? Language Learning &
Technology, 1(1), 19-43.
[12]. Chapelle, C. A. (2010). The spread of computerassisted
language learning. Language Teaching, 43(1), 66-
74.
[13]. Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy
nd and change in American classrooms, 1890-1990 (2 ed.).
New York: Teachers College Press.
[14]. Çelik, S. (2012). Competency levels of teachers in
using interactive whiteboards. Contemporary Educational
Technology, 3(2), 115–129.
[15]. Davis, F. (1989). User acceptance of computer
technology: A comparison of two theoretical models.
Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. Retrieved from
http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
[16]. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User
acceptance of computer technology a comparison of
two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-
1003.
[17]. Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second
language research: Construction, administration, and
processing. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[18]. EIN (2017). FA TH Project Teacher Trainings. Retrieved
from http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/ogretmen-egitimi/
[19]. Eren, E. (2015). Ortaokul ve Lise Ögrencilerinin
Egitimde Tablet Bilgisayar Kullanimina Iliskin Algilari ile
Görüsleri [Perceptions and opinions of middle and high
school students about tablet computers in education]. Ahi
Evran Üniversitesi Kirsehir Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD),
16(1), 409-428.
[20]. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order
barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration.
Educational Technology Research and Development,
47(4), 47-61. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/BF022
99597
[21]. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The
final frontier in our quest for technology integration?
Educational Technology Research and Development,
53(4), 25–39.
[22]. FatihProjesi. (2015). FatihProjesi. Retrieved January from http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/tr/index.php
[23]. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How
th to design and evaluate research in education? (8 ed.).
New York: McGraw-Hill.
[24]. Garrett, N. (1991). Technology in the service of
language learning: Trends and issues. The Modern
Language Journal, 75(1), 74-101.
[25]. Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main
barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into preservice
teacher education programs. Journal of
Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 193–204.
[26]. Gök, A. (2014). Current situation, usage,
management and integration of the smart classroom
technologies within the scope of FATIH Project: A multiple
case study (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, METU,
Ankara).
[27]. Günbayi, I., & Yörük, T. (2015). General High School
Students' Opinions on the Use of Project FATIH. International
Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 2(1),
35–45.
[28]. Hismanoglu, S. (2010). Attitudes of L2 teachers
towards Internet-based foreign language teaching.
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 106-111.
[29]. Karakaya, K. (2010). An investigation of English
language teachers' attitudes toward computer
technology and their use of technology in language
teaching. (Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical
University, Ankara, Turkey).
[30]. Karatas, A. (2014). Lise ögretmenlerinin fatih projesi'ni
uygulamaya yönelik teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi
yeterliliklerinin incelenmesi: Adiyaman ili örnegi.
[Investigating high school teachers' pedagogical content
knowledge competence in implementing the Fatih
Project: Example of Adiyaman Province]. (Unpublished MA
Thesis, Sakarya University, Sakarya).
[31]. Kayak, S., & Kir, E. (2015). Evaluation of candidate
language teachers' level of knowledge and ideas towards
the use of interactive whiteboard. Journal of Computer
and Education Research, 3(5), 50–77.
[32]. Kaysi, A. G. F. & Aydin, H. (2014). Fatih Projesi
kapsaminda tablet bilgisayariçeriklerinindegerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of tablet computer contents under Fatih
Project]. E-International Journal of Educational Research,
5(3), 72–85.
[33]. Kirali, F. N. (2013). Fatih projesi kapsaminda dagitilan
tablet-pc uygulamalarina iliskin ögrenci görüsleri
[Students' views on the implementation of tablet-PC
distributed in scope of Fatih Project] (Unpublished MA
Thesis, Bahçesehir University, Istanbul).
[34]. Kocaoglu, B. Ü. (2013). Lise ögretmenlerinin FATIH
Projesi teknolojilerini kullanmaya yönelik öz yeterlik
inançlari: Kayseri ili örnegi [High school teachers' selfefficacy
beliefs to use technologies of Fatih Project]
(Unpublished MA Thesis, Sakarya University, Sakarya).
[35]. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic
environment in second language acquisition. In W. C.
Ritchie, & T. K. Bathia (Eds.), Handbook of Research on
Second Language, San Diego, CA: Acedemic Press, 413-
468.
[36]. MoNE. (2015a). Activity Report 2014. Ankara: MoNE.
Retrieved from https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/
2015_03/05123201_2014darefaalyetraporu.pdf
[37]. MoNE. (2015b). MilliEgitimBakanligi 2015-2019
strategic plan. Ankara: MoNE. Retrieved from
http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2015_09/100529
58_10.09.2015sp17.15imzasz.pdf
[38]. Murray, L., & Barnes, A. (1998). Beyond the “wow”
factor-evaluating multimedia language learning software
from a pedagogical viewpoint. System, 26(2), 249-259.
[39]. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies:
What every teacher should know. Newbury House
Publishers.
[40]. Pabayo, A. C. (2006). The impact of technology use
on the perceptions of teachers and students, student
performance and attitudes in Christian life education in
Phillipine grade schools (Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of
San Francisco, California).
[41]. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants.
On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
[42]. Ritchie, D., & Wiburg, K. (1994). Educational variables
influencing technology integration. Journal of Technology
and Teacher Education, 2(2), 143-153.
[43]. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4 ed.).
New York: Free.
[44]. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5 ed.).
New York: Free.
[45]. Sayir, M. F. (2014). Students' and teachers' attitudes
toward interactive whiteboards used in English courses via
FATIH Project and the effects of IWBs on speaking skill
(Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Çag University, Mersin).
[46]. Skehan, P. (2003). Focus on form, tasks, and
technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(5),
391-411.
[47]. Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in
search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA
Review, 11, 11-26.
[48]. Smith, B. (2003). Computer–mediated negotiated
interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language
Journal, 87(1), 38–57.
[49]. Stoof, A., Martens, R. L., Van Merrienboer, J. J. (2000).
What is competence? A constructivist approach as a way
out of confusion. Paper presented at the Onderwijs
Research Dagen [The Conference of the Dutch
Educational Research Association], Leiden.
[50]. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence:
Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible
output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.),
Input in Second Language Acquisition, Rowley, MA:
Newbury House, 235-253.
[51]. Sanli, Ö., Altun, M., & Tan, Ç. (2015). Ögretmenlerin
akillitahta ve ögrencilere dagitilan tablet bilgisayarlar ileilgili
yasadiklari sounlar ve çözüm önerileri [Problems and
solution offers of the teachers about smart boards and the
tablets delivered to the students]. International Periodical
for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic,
10(3), 833-850.
[52]. Tomlinson, B. (2013). Second language acquisition
and materials development. In Tomlinson, B. (Ed.) Applied
Linguistics and Materials Development, (pp. 11-30).
London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 11-30.
[53]. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2016). Information Society
Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.
do?metod=temelist
[54]. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D.
(2003). User acceptance of information technology:
Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
[55]. Verhelst, N., Van Avermaet, P., Takala, S., Figueras, N.,
& North, B. (2006). The common European framework in its
political and educational context. The common European
framework of reference for languages: learning,
teaching, assessment. Cambridge University.
[56]. Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing
preservice teachers' self-efficacy beliefs for technology
integration. Journal of Research on Technology in
Education, 36(3), 231–250.
[57]. Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and Social
Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. USA: MIT Press.
[58]. Yang, M. L. (2006). Exploring Taiwanese EFL students'
responses to synchronous CMC: Effects on language use,
learning and transfer, and perceptions (Ph.D. Dissertation,
University of Texas, Austin).
[59]. Yeni-Palabiyik, P. (2013). In-service EFL teachers' selfefficacy
beliefs for technology integration: Insights form
FATIH Project (Unpublished Master Thesis, AbantIzzet Baysal
University, Bolu).
[60]. Zhao, Y. (2005). Recent developments in technology
and language learning: A literature review and metaanalysis.
In Zhao, Y. (Ed.), Research in Technology and
Second Language Learning: Developments and
Directions (pp. 17-31), USA: IPA, 17-37.
