Exploring Teacher and Learner Views on the use of Formative Assessment in Primary EAL Classrooms: A Case Study

Oksana Afitska*
*Lecturer, Applied Linguistics with TESOL, University of Sheffield, England.
Periodicity:July - September'2017
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.7.3.13591

Abstract

In England, number of learners who speak English as their second or even third language (known as learners with EAL, English as an Additional Language) in state primary and secondary schools is constantly increasing. In 2012, these learners represented 16% of the entire school population, and in 2015 - 18% (DfE, 2013 and 2016). Many EAL learners have limited proficiency in the language of instruction. This fact makes it difficult for teachers to not only effectively teach, but also accurately assess these learners' academic (linguistic and subject-specific) progress. Making use of a recently introduced formative assessment model to support and assess EAL learners' performance during the lessons seems like a good idea. However, to date little is known about the effectiveness of this assessment method and about the teachers' and learners' views on it. This paper, drawing on a selection of the data collected as part of a larger mixedmethods empirical research study (Afitska, 2014a), seeks to examine teachers' and learners' views on the usefulness of formative assessment methods (including teacher feedback, learner peer-assessment, and self-assessment) for teaching and learning. The paper concludes with a list of implications for practice based on the study's findings.

Keywords

Formative Assessment, Learner Self-assessment, Learner Peer-assessment, Teacher Feedback, Primary Education, English as an Additional Language, Classroom-based Research

How to Cite this Article?

Afitska, O. (2017). Exploring Teacher and Learner Views on the use of Formative Assessment in Primary EAL Classrooms: A Case Study. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 7(3), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.7.3.13591

References

[1]. Afitska, O. (2014a). Formative use of language assessment: Supporting learning through the medium of a second language, US-China Education Review Journal, 4(8), 517-535.
[2]. Afitska, O. (2014b). Use of formative assessment, selfand peer-assessment in the classrooms: Some insights from recent language testing and assessment research. i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 4(1), 29-39.
[3]. Assessing English as an Additional Language (2002). Strategies for Language for Communication for Pupils with EAL: Assessing Development in English and Providing Support. Ferris, A., Catling, P. and I. Scott (Eds.) London: Learning Design Limited.
[4]. Assessment Reform Group (1999). Assessment for Learning: Beyond the Black Box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. www.assessment-reform-group.org
[5]. Bachman, L. & A. Palmer (1996). Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[6]. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
[7]. Bourne, J. (2001). Multilingualism in English Primary Schools paper presented at Scottish CILT Conference 'Languages Policy in the Isles', 22 and 23 January 2001. http://www.scilt.stir.ac.uk/Archive/EYL/January%20Confere nce/Conference%20papers/Bourne.html
[8]. Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: the effects of task-involvingand ego-involving evaluation on interest and involvement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1-14.
[9]. Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education, 12(1), 39-54.
[10]. Cheng, C., & Wang, X. (2007). Grading, feedback, and reporting in ESL/EFL classrooms. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(1), 85-107.
[11]. Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing, 22(1), 93-121.
[12]. Chu, P. (2007). How students react to the power and responsibility of being decision makers in their own learning. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 225-241.
[13]. Department for Education (DfE) (2013). Schools, pupils, and their characteristics. National Statistics. January 2013. London: Department for Education (accessed on 12 December 2016).
[14]. Department for Education (DfE) (2016). Schools, pupils, and their characteristics. National Statistics. January 2016. London: Department for Education (accessed on 12 December 2016).
[15]. DfES (2003). Targeting for success: Raising the attainment of minority ethnic pupils learning English as an additional language. Nottingham, U.K.: DfES Publications.
[16]. DfES (2005). Aiming High: Guidance on the assessment of pupils learning English as an additional language. Nottingham: DfES Publications.
[17]. Fontana, D., & Fernandes, M. (1994). Improvements in mathematics performance as a consequence of selfassessment in Portuguese primary school pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(3), 407-41.
[18]. Foster, P. (1996). Observational Research. In Sapsford R. and Jupp V. (Eds.), Data Collection and Analysis. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
[19]. Hall, K., & W. M. Burke (2003). Making Formative Assessment Work: Effective Practice in the Primary Classroom. London: Open University Press.
[20]. Hasselgren, A. (2000). The assessment of the English ability of young learners in Norwegian schools: An innovative approach. Language Testing, 17(2), 261-277.
[21]. Harlen, W., & Winter, J. (2004). The development of assessment for learning: Learning from the case of science and mathematics. Language Testing, 21(3), 390- 408.
[22]. Johnson, D. M. (1992). Approaches to Research in Second Language Learning. White Plains, N.Y.: Longman Publishing Group.
[23]. McDonald, B., & Boud, D. (2003). The impact of selfassessment on achievement: The effects of selfassessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education, 10(2), 209-220.
[24]. McDonough, J. & S. McDonough (1997). Research Methods for English Language Teachers. London: Arnold.
[25]. McGarrell, H., & Verbeem, J. (2007). Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback. English Language Teaching Journal, 61(3), 228-236.
[26]. Morris, F. A., & Tarone, E. E. (2003). Impact of classroom dynamics on the effectiveness of recasts in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 53(2), 325-368.
[27]. National Association for Language Development in the Curriculum (NALDIC) (2007). Position statement on assessment of English as an additional language. Retrieved from http://www.naldic.org.uk/docs/research/ assessment.cfm
[28]. NALDIC International Survey (2005). EAL Assessment. Retrieved from www.naldic.org.uk/docs/research/ assessment.cfm
[29]. Patri, M. (2002). The influence of peer feedback on self and peer-assessment of oral skills. Language Testing, 19(2), 109-131.
[30]. Pinter, A. (2007). Some benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practicing with a communication task. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 189-207.
[31]. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) (1999). National curriculum. Retrieved from http://www. nc.uk.net/inclusion
[32]. QCA (2000). A language in common: Assessing English as an additional language. London, U.K.: QCA Publications. Retrieved from http://www.naldic.org.uk/docs/ resources/KeyDocs.cfm
[33]. Rea-Dickins, P. (2001). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Identifying processes of classroom assessment. Language Testing, 18(4), 429-462.
[34]. Rea-Dickins, P. (2003). Exploring the educational potential of assessment with reference to learners with English as an additional language. In C. Leung (Ed.), Language and Additional/Second Language issues for School Education: A Reader for Teachers (pp. 81-93). York, U.K.: York Publishing Services.
[35]. Rea-Dickins, P. (2007). Classroom-based assessment: Possibilities and pitfalls. In C. Davison, & J. P. Cummins (Eds.), The International Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 505-520). Norwell, M.A.: Springer Publications.
[36]. Rea-Dickins, P., & Gardner, S. (2000). Snares and silver bullets: Disentangling the construct of formative assessment. Language Testing, 17(2), 215-243.
[37]. Ross, S. J. (2005). The impact of assessment method on foreign language proficiency growth. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 317-342.
[38]. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18,(2), 119-144.
[39]. School Curriculum and Assessment Authority (SCAA) (1996). Teaching English as an Additional Language: A framework for policy, school curriculum and assessment authority. London, U.K.: SCAA.
[40]. Smith, E., & Gorard, S. (2005). ‘They don't give us our marks’: The role of formative feedback in student progress. Assessment in Education, 12(1), 21-38.
[41]. Storch, N. (2007). Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 143-159.
[42]. Swann, J. (1994). Observing and Recording Talk in Educational Settings. In Graddol D., Maybin J. and Stierer B. (Eds.), Researching Language and Literacy in Social Context. Clevedon; Philadelphia; Adelaide: Multilingual Matters Ltd, in association with The Open University.
[43]. Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 615-631.
[44]. Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 389-404.
[45]. Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education, 11(1), 49- 65.
[46]. Yoshida R. (2008). Teachers' choice and learners' preference of corrective feedback types. Language Awareness, 17(1), 78-93.

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article
Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.