i-manager Publications

A Novel Loss Distribution Strategy after Removing Slack Bus using ImprovedKinetic Gas Molecules Optimization Algorithm

D. Srilatha*, Sivanagaraju Sirigiri**

* Associate Professor, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Prakasam Engineering College, Kandukur, A.P., India.

** Professor, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, University College of Engineering, JNTU Kakinada, Kakinada, A.P., India.

Periodicity:February - April'2017
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jps.5.1.13533

Abstract

The modern power system analysis, operation and control use pneumatic solution methodologies to solve more realistic power system problems to enhance the operational aspects of power systems. The conventional load flow methods work independent of economic and environmental aspects and allocates total power losses to slack bus which increases the burden on this generator. In this paper, a novel methodology to remove extra generation by the slack and to optimize the system operation in economic and environmental aspects is presented. Further, a new hybrid optimization algorithm namely Improved Kinetic Gas Molecules Optimization (IKGMO) is presented to solve Optimal Power Flow (OPF) problem while satisfying system equality and inequality constraints. The effectiveness of optimization over the conventional load flow in loss allocation is tested on standard IEEE-14 bus and IEEE-30 bus test systems with supporting numerical and graphical results.

Keywords

Loss Allocation, Removing Slack Bus, IKGMO, Economic Aspect, Environmental Aspect

How to Cite this Article?

Srilatha, D., and Sivanagaraju, S. (2017). A Novel Loss Distribution Strategy after Removing Slack Bus using Improved Kinetic Gas Molecules Optimization Algorithm. i-manager’s Journal on Power Systems Engineering, 5(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.26634/jps.5.1.13533

References

[1]. Alvarado, F. L. (1978). Penalty factors from Newton's method. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 6, 2031-2040.

[2]. Banerjee, S., Maity, D., & Chanda, C. K. (2015). Teaching learning based optimization for economic load dispatch problem considering valve point loading effect. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 73, 456-464.

[3]. Basu, M. (2015). Modified particle swarm optimization for nonconvex economic dispatch problems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 69, 304-312.

[4]. Christie, R. (1993). Power Systems Test Case Archive: 30 Bus Power Flow Test Case. Retrieved from http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca/pf30/pg_ tca30bus.htm (accessed 04-Mar-2013).

[5]. Coelho, L. D. S., Bora, T. C., & Mariani, V. C. (2014). Differential evolution based on truncated Lévy-type flights and population diversity measure to solve economic load dispatch problems. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 57(1), 178-188.

[6]. Duman, S., Güvenç, U., Sönmez, Y., & Yörükeren, N. (2012). Optimal power flow using gravitational search algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 59, 86- 95.

[7]. Eberhart, R. C., & Shi, Y. (1998, March). Comparison between genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization. In International Conference on Evolutionary Programming (pp. 611-616). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

[8]. Elsayed, W. T., & El-Saadany, E. F. (2015). A fully decentralized approach for solving the economic dispatch problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 30(4), 2179-2189.

[9]. Hazarika, D., & Bordoloi, P. K. (1991, March). Modified loss coefficients in the determination of optimum generation scheduling. In IEE Proceedings C (Generation, Transmission and Distribution) (Vol. 138, No. 2, pp. 166- 172). IET Digital Library.

[10]. Jang, G. S., Hur, D., Park, J. K., & Lee, S. H. (2005). A modified power flow analysis to remove a slack bus with a sense of economic load dispatch. Electric Power Systems Research, 73(2), 137-142.

[11]. Jiang, A., & Ertem, S. (1995). Polynomial loss models for economic dispatch and error estimation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 10(3), 1546-1552.

[12]. Kumari, M. S., & Maheswarapu, S. (2010). Enhanced genetic algorithm based computation technique for multi-objective optimal power flow solution. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 32(6), 736- 742.

[13]. Moein, S., & Logeswaran, R. (2014). KGMO: A swarm optimization algorithm based on the kinetic energy of gas molecules. Information Sciences, 275, 127-144.

[14]. Niknam, T., Narimani, M. R., Aghaei, J., & Azizipanah-Abarghooee, R. (2012). Improved particle swarm optimisation for multi-objective optimal power flow considering the cost, loss, emission and voltage stability index. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 6(6), 515-527.

[15]. Niknam, T., Narimani, M. R., Jabbari, M., & Malekpour, A. R. (2011). A modified shuffle frog leaping algorithm for multi-objective optimal power flow. Energy, 36(11), 6420-6432.

[16]. Okamura, M., O-ura, Y., Hayashi, S., Uemura, K., & Ishiguro, F. (1975). A new power flow model and solution method?Including load and generator characteristics and effects of system control devices. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 94(3), 1042-1050.

[17]. Park, Y. M., Lee, J. H., & Newton, A. (1993). Raphson load flow considering frequency characteristics, Korean Inst. Electrical Eng, 42, 85-93.

[18]. Power Systems Test Case Archive. Retrieved from https://www2.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca/pf14/p g_tca14bus.htm

[19]. Sayah, S., & Zehar, K. (2008). Modified differential evolution algorithm for optimal power flow with nonsmooth cost functions. Energy Conversion and Management, 49(11), 3036-3042.

[20]. Shin, J. R., & Yim, H. S. (1993, October). An extended approach for NR load flow with power loss correction method. In TENCON'93 Proceedings. Computer, Communication, Control and Power Engineering. 1993 IEEE Region 10 Conference on (Vol. 5, pp. 402-405). IEEE.

[21]. Sinha, N., Chakrabarti, R., & Chattopadhyay, P. K. (2003). Evolutionary programming techniques for economic load dispatch. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 7(1), 83-94.

[22]. Subbaraj, P., & Rajnarayanan, P. N. (2009). Optimal reactive power dispatch using self-adaptive real coded genetic algorithm. Electric Power Systems Research, 79(2), 374-381.

[23]. Zhu, Y., Wang, J., & Qu, B. (2014). Multi-objective economic emission dispatch considering wind power using evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 63, 434-445.

A Novel Loss Distribution Strategy after Removing Slack Bus using ImprovedKinetic Gas Molecules Optimization Algorithm

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content:

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25