Affective And Social Factors In A Project-Based Writing Course

Sujata S. Kathpalia*, Carmel Heah**
* Lecturer, Language and Communication Centre in the School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University.
** Academic Associate Director, Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (CELT), Nanyang Technological University.
Periodicity:January - March'2011
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.1.1.1349

Abstract

Much of the work in academic writing has focused on the cognitive rather than the affective and social aspects involved in project-based writing. Emphasis in past research has been on skills and processes of writing rather than on affective factors such as motivation, attitudes, feelings or social factors involving intrapersonal and interpersonal communication. However, according to Vygotsky's sociocultural theory (SCT) social factors play an important role in collaborative learning and are considered to be a constitutive element of cognition (1978, 1986). Using this theory of learning as a starting point, the aim of this paper is to determine the affective and social factors involved in project based writing in an academic writing course at Nanyang Technological University. Specifically, the four motivational aspects that will be considered are curiosity, challenge, confidence and control as reflected in student responses to an online questionnaire and their reflections on the course. It is hoped that the findings of this research will further our understanding of the role of affective and social factors in project-based writing courses in settings where students are collaborating face-to-face to complete the course tasks and assignments.

Keywords

Academic Writing, Collaborative Learning, Social and Affective Factors, Project-based Course, Student Reflections, Online Questionnaire.

How to Cite this Article?

Kathpalia, S. S., and Heah, C. (2011). Affective And Social Factors In A Project-Based Writing Course. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 1(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.1.1.1349

References

[1]. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
[2]. Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 215.
[3]. Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. New Jersy: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[4]. Fink, L. D. (2004). Learning Portfolios: A powerful tool for enhancing course design, in J. Zubizarreta, The learning portfolio: Reflective practice for improving student learning (Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development; Alexandra, VA): 92-99.
[5]. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Context and issues. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[6]. Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computer & Education 44, 395.
[7]. Jones, M., & Shelton, M. (2006). Developing your portfolio: Enhancing your learning and showing your stuff. New York: Routledge.
[8]. Kathpalia, S. S., & Heah, Carmel. (2008). Reflective writing: What lies beneath. RELC Journal, 39(3), 300.
[9]. Keller, J. M. (1987). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance and Instruction, 26(8), 1.
[10]. Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33, 79.
[11]. Lea, M. & Nicoll, K. (Eds.) (2002). Distributed learning: Social and cultural approaches to practice. London: Routledge.
[12]. Lim, W. L., & Jacobs, G. M. (2001). An analysis of students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 113.
[13]. Lucas, R. I. G. (2007). A study on portfolio assessment as an effective student self-evaluation scheme. Paper presented at the 42nd RELC International Seminar, 23 – 25 April, 2007.
[14]. Stanley, J. (1992). Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), 217.
[15]. Stone, C. A. (1993). What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding? In E. A. Foram, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development. New York: Oxford University Press
[16]. Villamil. O. S., & Guerrero, M. C. M. de. (2006). Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding socio-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback. In K. Hyland and F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Context and issues. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[17]. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[18]. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published in 1934).
[19]. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.