Second Life for Distance Language Learning: A Framework for Native/Non-Native Speaker Interactions in a Virtual World

Jennifer Tusing*, Zane L. Berge**
*-** Professor of Education, University of Maryland.
Periodicity:October - December'2010
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.7.3.1339

Abstract

This paper examines a number of theoretical principles governing second language teaching and learning and the ways in which these principles are being applied in 3D virtual worlds such as Second Life. Also examined are the benefits to language learning afforded by the Second Life interface, including access, the availability of native speakers of the target language, and the enhanced presence afforded by 3D virtual worlds as compared to multi-user object oriented domains and other chat interfaces that provide no sense of place. It is concluded that while an appropriate environment for communicative foreign language practice, not all students may be ready to meet the technological demands required by the use of Second Life.

Keywords

Second Life, Distance Language Learning, Virtual Words, Foreign Language Teaching, Multi-User Virtual Environments (MUVEs).

How to Cite this Article?

Jennifer Tusing and Zane L. Berge (2010). Second Life For Distance Language Learning: A Framework For Native/Non-Native Speaker Interactions In A Virtual World. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 7(3), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.7.3.1339

References

[1]. Adcock, A. (2008). Making digital game-based learning work: An instructional designer's perspective. Library Media Connection, 26(5), 56-57.
[2]. Appel, M. C. (1999). Tandem language learning by e-mail: Some basic principles and a case study. CLCS Occasional Paper No. 54. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED430396). Retrieved from ERIC Database.
[9]. Cooke-Plagwitz, J. (2008). New directions in CALL: An objective introduction to Second Life. CALICO Journal 25(3), 547-557.
[10]. Cziko, G. A. (2004). Electronic tandem language learning (eTandem): A third approach to second language learning for the 21st century. CALICO Journal, 22(1), 25-39.
[13]. Galloway, A. (1993). Communicative language teaching: An introduction and sample activities. ERIC Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED357642). Retrieved from ERIC Database.
[14]. Hastings, R. (2000). Asynchronous learning from the student perspective. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED452891). Retrieved from ERIC database.
[17]. Kötter, M. (2001). MOOrituri te saluant? Language learning through moo-based synchronous exchanges between learner tandems. Computer Assisted Language Learning 14(3-4), 289-304.
[22]. Myers, L. L. (2000). Task interpretation and task effectiveness: A Vygotskian analysis of a French L2 classroom task. Proceedings of the Texas Foreign Language [Education] Conference. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED468307). Retrieved from ERIC database.
[25]. Oxford, R. (2006). Task-based language learning: An overview [Electronic Version]. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 8 (3), 94-121.
[27]. Savignon, S. J. (1972). Communicative competence: An experiment in foreign language teaching and learning. Philadelphia: The Center for Curriculum Development, Inc.
[28]. Savignon, S. J. (1983). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice: Texts and contexts in second language learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
[29]. Schwienhorst, K. (2002). Evaluating tandem language learning in the MOO: Discourse repair strategies in a bilingual internet project. Computer Assisted Language Learning 15(2), 135-145.
[30]. Schwienhorst, K. (2004). Native-speaker/non-native-speaker discourse in the MOO: Topic negotiation and initiation in a synchronous text-based environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(1), 35-50.
[31]. Standards for foreign language learning: Preparing for the 21st century. (1996). Lawrence, KS: Allen Press, Inc.
[33]. Thorne, S. L. (2005). Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education: Approaches, pedagogy, and research (CALPER Working Paper No. 6). University Park, PA: Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research at Pennsylvania State University.
[37]. Von Der Emde, S., Schneider, J., & Kötter, M. (2001). Technically speaking: Transforming language learning through virtual learning environments (MOOs) [Electronic Version]. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 210-225.
[39]. Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. UK: Harvard University Press.
[40]. Yamada, M., & Akahori, K. (2007). Social presence in synchronous CMC-based language learning: How does it affect the productive performance and consciousness of learning objectives? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 37-65.
[42]. Zheng, D., Young, M. F., Brewer, R. A., Wagner, M., & Seo, J. H. (April, 2006). English language learning in a 3d virtual environment: native/non-native speaker dyads co-questing in Quest Atlantis. Paper presented as a featured session at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 7-11. San Francisco, CA.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.