References
[1]. Adcock, A. (2008). Making digital game-based learning work: An instructional designer's perspective. Library Media Connection, 26(5), 56-57.
[2]. Appel, M. C. (1999). Tandem language learning by e-mail: Some basic principles and a case study. CLCS Occasional Paper No. 54. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED430396). Retrieved from ERIC Database.
[6].
Blake, R., Wilson, N. L., Cetto, M., & Pardo-Ballester, C. (2008). Measuring oral proficiency in distance, face-to-face, and blended classrooms. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 114-127.
[9]. Cooke-Plagwitz, J. (2008). New directions in CALL: An objective introduction to Second Life. CALICO Journal 25(3), 547-557.
[10]. Cziko, G. A. (2004). Electronic tandem language learning (eTandem): A third approach to second language learning for the 21st century. CALICO Journal, 22(1), 25-39.
[13]. Galloway, A. (1993). Communicative language teaching: An introduction and sample activities. ERIC Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED357642). Retrieved from ERIC Database.
[14]. Hastings, R. (2000). Asynchronous learning from the student perspective. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED452891). Retrieved from ERIC database.
[17]. Kötter, M. (2001). MOOrituri te saluant? Language learning through moo-based synchronous exchanges between learner tandems. Computer Assisted Language Learning 14(3-4), 289-304.
[22]. Myers, L. L. (2000). Task interpretation and task effectiveness: A Vygotskian analysis of a French L2 classroom task. Proceedings of the Texas Foreign Language [Education] Conference. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED468307). Retrieved from ERIC database.
[25]. Oxford, R. (2006). Task-based language learning: An overview [Electronic Version]. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 8 (3), 94-121.
[27]. Savignon, S. J. (1972). Communicative competence: An experiment in foreign language teaching and learning. Philadelphia: The Center for Curriculum Development, Inc.
[28]. Savignon, S. J. (1983). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice: Texts and contexts in second language learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
[29]. Schwienhorst, K. (2002). Evaluating tandem language learning in the MOO: Discourse repair strategies in a bilingual internet project. Computer Assisted Language Learning 15(2), 135-145.
[30]. Schwienhorst, K. (2004). Native-speaker/non-native-speaker discourse in the MOO: Topic negotiation and initiation in a synchronous text-based environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(1), 35-50.
[31]. Standards for foreign language learning: Preparing for the 21st century. (1996). Lawrence, KS: Allen Press, Inc.
[33]. Thorne, S. L. (2005). Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education: Approaches, pedagogy, and research (CALPER Working Paper No. 6). University Park, PA: Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research at Pennsylvania State University.
[37]. Von Der Emde, S., Schneider, J., & Kötter, M. (2001). Technically speaking: Transforming language learning through virtual learning environments (MOOs) [Electronic Version]. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 210-225.
[39]. Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. UK: Harvard University Press.
[40]. Yamada, M., & Akahori, K. (2007). Social presence in synchronous CMC-based language learning: How does it affect the productive performance and consciousness of learning objectives? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 37-65.
[42]. Zheng, D., Young, M. F., Brewer, R. A., Wagner, M., & Seo, J. H. (April, 2006). English language learning in a 3d virtual environment: native/non-native speaker dyads co-questing in Quest Atlantis. Paper presented as a featured session at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 7-11. San Francisco, CA.