Quantitative Risk Assessment

Kailas L. Wasewar*, M. Siva Kumar**
* Head and Associate Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology (VNIT), Nagpur, India.
** Process Engineer, GE Energy, Bangalore, India.
Periodicity:August - October'2010
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jfet.6.1.1292

Abstract

The chemical process industries (CPI) contributed significantly in Indian economy. The growing importance of environment concerns is forcing CPI to use the state-of-the-art technology which increases the complexity of the process. The diversity in the products manufactured by CPI has made it more and more common for these industries to use reactors, conduits and storage vessels in which hazardous substances are handled at extreme conditions. Accidents in such units are caused either by material failure (such as crack in the storage vessels), operational mistakes (such as raising the pressures temperature/flow-rate beyond critical limits), or external perturbation (such as damage caused by a projectile) can have serious-often catastrophic-consequences. The accidental release of the inventory results in toxic release, fires and explosions. Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) is utilised as a tool to evaluate the risk posed to the society from the process and storage facilities. In present paper, the status of quantitative risk assessments in chemical process industries has been described.

Keywords

QRA; Chemical Process Industries, Analysis; Status

How to Cite this Article?

Wasewar, K. L. and Kumar, M. S (2010). Quantitative Risk Assessment. i-manager’s Journal on Future Engineering and Technology, 6(1), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.26634/jfet.6.1.1292

References

[1]. Abbasi, T., and S. A. Abbasi, (2007). The boiling liquid expanding vapour explosion (BLEVE): Mechanism, consequence assessment, management. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 141, 489-519.
[2]. Alonso, F.D., et al. (2006). Characteristic overpressure–impulse–distance curves for vapour cloud explosions using the TNO Multi-Energy model. Journal of Hazardous Materials, A137, 734-741.
[3]. Arendt, J.S. (1990). Using Quantitative Risk Assessment in the Chemical Process Industry. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 29, 133-149.
[4]. Beerens, H.I., et al. (2006). The use of generic failure frequencies in QRA: The quality and use of failure frequencies and how to bring them up-to-date. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 130, 265–270.
[5]. CCPS. (2000). Guidelines for Chemical process Quantitative Risk analysis second edition. Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York.
[6]. Chang, J.I., and C.C. Lin, (2006). A study of storage tank accidents. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19, pp.51-59.
[7]. Ditali, S., et al. (2000). Consequence analysis in LPG installation using an integrated computer package. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 71, 159-177.
[8]. Early, W.F. (2006). Database management systems for process safety. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 130, 53- 57.
[9]. Khan, F.I., and S.A. Abbasi (1998). Techniques and methodologies for risk analysis in chemical process industries. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 11, 261-277.
[10]. Khan, F.I., and S.A. Abbasi (1999). Major accidents in process industries and an analysis of causes and Consequences. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 12, 361-378.
[11]. Khan, F.I., and S.A. Abbasi (2001). Risk analysis of a typical chemical industry using ORA procedure. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 14, 43-59.
[12]. Melchers, R.E., and W.R. Feutrill (2001). Risk assessment of LPG automotive Refuelling facilities. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 74, 283-290.
[13]. Mercx, W.P.M., et al. (2000). Developments in vapour cloud explosion blast modeling. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 71, 301–319.
[14]. Moosemiller, M. (2006). Avoiding pitfalls in assembling an equipment failure rate database for risk assessments. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 130, 128- 132.
[15]. Pietersen, C. M., and B. F. P. van het Veld (1992). Risk assessment and risk contour mapping. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol.5, No.1.
[16]. Tweeddale, H.M., R.F., Cameron, and S.S., Sylvester, (1992). Some experiences in hazard identification and risk shortlisting. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol.5, No.5, 279-288.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.