The Ecology Model Of Learning: Evaluating Digital Media Applications (DMAS) Using Established Ecological Subsystems Of Learning

James E. Folkestad*, James Banning**
* Associate Professor, Colorado State University, School of Education, Fort Collins, CO.
** Professor, Colorado State University, School of Education, Fort Collins, CO.
Periodicity:July - September'2010
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.7.2.1283

Abstract

Digital media applications (DMAs) have emerged in abundance over the last ten years.  Enabled by exponential growth in computing power and inexpensive data storage, these applications are easy to use and inexpensive (often free) to own.  DMAs not only allow users to produce digital content efficiently they allow users to exploit the connective power of the Internet to distribute their work. These affordances are allowing users to connect with others in significant ways enabling entirely new ecosystems built around collaborative learning and discovery.  The purpose of this article is to build a linkage between the interactivity of digital media applications and an ecological model of learning that is also built on the concept of interactivity.  The ecological model postulates that the learner interacting with the environmental conditions is important to learning.  The article describes the ecological model of learning and how the “subsystems” of the model can serve as an evaluation rubric for DMAs.  We conclude that developers of DMAs are creating environmental conditions conducive to learning based on ecology.  Based on this analysis we provide several recommendations for selecting applications for learning and for strengthening these learning environments.

Keywords

Digital Media, Ecology Model, Learning, Learning Strategy, Digital Media And Learning.

How to Cite this Article?

James E. Folkestad and James Banning (2010). The Ecology Model Of Learning: Evaluating Digital Media Applications (DMAS) Using Established Ecological Subsystems Of Learning. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.7.2.1283

References

[1]. Altheide, D. L. (1987). Ethnographic content analysis. Qualitative Sociology , 10 (1), 65-77.
[2]. Altheide, D. L., Coyle, M., DeVriese, K., & Schneider, C. (2008). Emergent qualitative document analysis. In S. N. Hesse-Biber, & P. Leavy, Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 127-154). New York: Guilford Press.
[3]. Banning, J.H., & Kuk, L. (2005). Campus ecology and college student health. Spectrum, 9-15.
[4]. Blocher, D. H. (1978). Campus learning environments and the ecology of student development. In J. H. Banning, (Ed), Campus ecology: A perspective for students affairs, 17-23.
[5]. Blocher, D. H. (1987). The Professional Counselor. New York, NY: MacMillan Publishing Company.
[6]. Blocher, D. H. (1974). Toward an ecology of students development. Personnel and guidance Journal , 52 (6), 360-365.
[7]. Boyatis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[8]. Bronfrenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[9]. Brown, J.S. (2000). Growing up digital: How the web changes work, education and the ways people learn. Change, March-April, 11-20.
[10]. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[11]. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: MacMillan Publishing Company.
[13]. Garrison, D. R. & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
[14]. Gee, P. J. (2010). New digital media and learning as an emerging area and "worked examples" as one way forward. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[15]. Gutl, C. & Chang, V. (2008). Ecosystems-based theoretical models for learning in environments of the 21st century. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 3, 50-60.
[17]. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[18]. Kripppendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[19]. Kuk, L., Banning, J.H.; & Amey, M. J. (2010). Positioning student affairs for sustainable change. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
[20]. Lewin, K. (1938). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
[21]. McCalla, G. (2004). The ecological approach to the design of e-learning environments: Purpose-based capture and use of information about learners. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 7, 1-23.
[22]. Nordi, B. & O'Day, V. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart, Boston, MA: MIT Press.
[23]. Prickett, S.T. & Cadenasso, M. L. (2002). The ecosystem as a multidimensional concept: Meaning, model, and metaphor. Ecosystems, 5, 1-10.
[24]. Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Press HC.
[26]. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.