Utilizing Multi-Modal Literacies In Middle Grades Science

Dan Saurino*, Tamra Ogletree**, Penelope Saurino***
* University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Dept. of Middle Grades, Secondary & K-12 Education, University City Boulevard Charlotte, NC.
** Assistant Professor, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of West Georgia, Georgia.
*** Western Carolina University, College of Education and Applied Professions, Elementary and Middle Grades Education, North Carolina.
Periodicity:July - September'2010
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.7.2.1282

Abstract

The nature of literacy is changing.  Increased student use of computer-mediated, digital, and visual communication spans our understanding of adolescent multi-modal capabilities that reach beyond the traditional conventions of linear speech and written text in the science curriculum.  Advancing technology opens doors to learning that involve literacies far beyond the single textbook classroom.  Our research project looked at the effects of utilizing multi-modal strategies and techniques in the middle grades science curriculum and incorporated a qualitative collaborative interactive group action research methodology.  We completed one “cycle’ of research and concluded that using the multi-modal tools and techniques students engage in outside of the classroom was a beneficial addition to the traditional curriculum inside the classroom.  We recommend more research at other grade levels and content areas to develop specific strategies and techniques to incorporate multi-modal strategies and techniques in more aspects of teaching science.

Keywords

Multi-Modal, Multiliteracies, Middle Grades Science Curriculum, Science Pedagogy, Action Research, Collaborative Action Research, Collaborative Interactive Group Action Research, Cigar.

How to Cite this Article?

Dan Saurino, Tamra Ogletree and Penelope Saurino (2010). Utilizing Multi-Modal Literacies In Middle Grades Science. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.7.2.1282

References

[1]. Allen, J. (2000). Yellow Brick Roads: Shared and Guided reading paths to independent reading 4-12. Portland, MA: Stenhouse.
[2]. Alvermann, D.E. (2001). Effective Literacy Instruction for Adolescents. Executive Summary and Paper Commissioned by the National Reading Conference. Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
[3]. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1983). Becoming critical: Knowing through action research. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
[4]. Eisner, E. (1994). Cognition and curriculum reconsidered (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
[5]. Elliott, J. (1990). Teachers as researchers: Implications for supervision and for teacher education. Teaching & Teacher Education, 6(1), 1-26.
[6]. Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies. (2 ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis.
[7]. Keene, E.O., & Zimmerman, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought: Teaching comprehension in a reader's workshop. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
[8]. Luke, A., & Elkins, J. (1998). Reinventing literacy in “new times.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42, 4-7.
[9]. Moore, D.W., & Hinchman, K.A. (2008). Starting out: A guide to teaching adolescents who struggle with reading. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
[10]. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Education Review, 66(1), 60-92.
[11]. Noffke, S.E., & Zeichner, K.W. (1987, April). Action research and teacher thinking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
[12]. Pate, P.E. (1997). Teaming and decision making. In T. S. Dickinson, & T. O. Erb (Eds.), Teaming in middle schools (pp. 425-442). Columbus, Ohio: National Middle School Association.
[13]. Rossi, R., & Montgomery, A. (1994). Educational reforms and students at-risk: A review of the current state of the art (Contract # RR91-1172011). U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
[14]. Saurino, D.R., & Saurino, P.L. (2008, April). Expanding the use of collaborative interactive group action research through distance technology. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
[15]. Saurino, D.R. (1998). A qualitative study of middle school collaborative team action research (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, In press.
[16]. Saurino, D.R., & Saurino, P.L. (1996). Collaborative teacher research: An investigation of alternative assessment. Current Issues in Middle Level Education, 5(2), 50-72.
[17]. Tovani, C. (2000). I read it but I don't get it: Comprehension strategies for adolescent readers. Portland, MA: Stenhouse Publishers.
[18]. Willinsky, J. (1990). The new literacy: Redefining reading and writing in the schools. New York: Routledge.
[19]. Young, J.P., Dillon, D.R., & Moje, E.B. (2001). Shape shifting portfolios: Millennial youth, literacies, and the game of life. In D.E. Alvermann (Ed.) Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. 114-131). New York: Peter Lang.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.