Effects of Extensive Engagement with Computer-Based Reading and Language Arts Instructional Software on Reading Achievement for Sixth Graders

Samuel Securro*, Jerry Dale Jones**, Danny Cantrell***
* Faculty member in the Doctoral Education Program, Marshall University Graduate Center, S. Charleston, WV.
** Faculty member , University of North Carolina-Pembroke, Pembroke, NC.
*** Director of Enrollment Management and Retention Services, West Virginia State University, Institute, WV.
Periodicity:June - August'2010
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.6.1.1262

Abstract

K-12 school practitioners and schools administrators need reliable results about the effects of instructional technology product s as they strive to meet achievement compliance levels in politically accountable local and national contexts in the U.S. This study presents evidence regarding the effects of extensive engagement with computer-based instructional software on the reading achievement of 86 6th graders, within a backdrop of two previous similar investigations at the same middle school between AY 2003-2007. A treatment group received computer-based, reading instruction for 24 weeks x 90 minutes weekly in addition to four, 90 minute blocks of conventional instruction. Control peers received conventional instruction in five, 90 minute blocks per week. Comparisons of achievement scores on year-end, standardized reading tests yielded substantial gains for treatment subjects compared to controls, with an effect size of .92. Girls significantly outperformed boys and those not receiving lunch funding did significantly better than those receiving lunch funding.  The conclusion is that extensive software engagement combined with in class instruction is an effective instructional context for enhancing reading achievement. Recommendations for further research suggest a “repeated trials” model in the same settings to give fidelity to curriculum, research methodology and the socio-cultural context for students and school.

Keywords

Reading Achievement, Computer-Assisted Interventions, Scientifically Based Reading Research, Reading And Language Arts Research And Computer-Based Instruction.

How to Cite this Article?

Samuel Securro JR, Jerry D. Jones and Danny R Cantrell (2010). Effects Of Extensive Engagement With Computer-Based Reading And Language Arts Instructional Software On Reading Achievement For Sixth Graders.i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 6(1), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.6.1.1262

References

[1]. Campuzano, L., Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., & Rall, K. (2009). Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings From Two Student Cohorts (NCEE 2009-4041). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved on October 1, 2008 from:http://ies.ed.gov/ ncee/pubs/20094041/pdf/ 20094041.pdf
[2]. Chall, J.S. & Dale, E. (1995). Readability Revisited: The New Dale-Chall Readability Formula. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
[3]. Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., Heaviside, S., Novak, T., Carey, N., Campuzano, L., Means, B., Murphy, R., Penuel, W., Javitz, H., Emery, D, & Susses, W. (2007). Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings from the First Student Cohort ( NCEE 2007-4005) Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from: http://www.eric. ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/ 0000019b/80/28/06/e7.pdf
[4]. Harris, A.J. & Jacobson, M.D. (1982). Basic Reading Vocabularies. New York: MacMillan.
[5]. Jones, J.D., Staats, W.D., Bowling, N., Bickel, R.D., Cunningham, M.L. & Cadle, C. (2004). An evaluation of the Merit reading software program in the Calhoun County (WV) middle/highschool. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(2), 177-195.
[6]. Kinnaman, D.E. (1990). “What's the research telling us”? Classroom Computer Learning, (Oct.) 31-35; 38-39.
[7]. McGraw-Hill. Education Standards Test, Technical Report, 2005 Supplement, Nov 15, 2005. Retrieved on November, 15, 2007 from: http://westest.k12.wv.us/pdf/ Board%20report%cutscores.pdf
[8]. Merit Corporation (2009). Teacher Practices for Using Software Solutions to Enhance Student Achievement. Retrieved on July 21, 2010 from: http://www.meritsoftware. com/teaching_tips/index.php
[9]. Merit Software Solutions. (2010). Middle School: Reading Comprehension Software Solutions, Intermediate Level. Retrieved on February, 11, 2010 from: http://www. meritsoftware.com/solutions/middle_school/reading_com prehension.php
[10]. Merit Corporation, (2005). Reading and Language Arts Correlations with WV Standards and Objectives. Retrieved on February,10,2010, from : http://www.meritsoftware.com/solutions/middle_school/ reading_comprehension.php
[11]. Moran., Ferdig, R. E., Pearson, P. D., Wardrop, J. & Blomeyer, R. L., Jr.(2008). Technology and reading performance in the middle-school grades: A metaanalysis with recommendations for policy and practice. Journal of Literacy Research,40 (1), DOI : 0.1080/10862960802070483 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Pub. L. No.107-110 Stat. 1425 (2001).
[12]. O'Byrne, B., Securro, S., Jones, J. & Cadle, C. (2006). Making the cut: The impact of an integrated learning system on low achieving middle school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 1-11.
[13]. Pearson, P.D., Ferdig, R.E., Blomeyer, R.L. Jr., & Moran, J. (2005). The Effects of Technology on Reading Performance in the Middle-School Grades: A Metaanalysis with Recommendations for Policy. Retrieved on October 14, 2008 from http://www.ncrel/org/tech/ reading/index.html
[14]. Securro, S., Jones, J., Quantrell, D. & Blackwell, J. (2006). Intervention that adds up: The impact of Merit software on standardized achievement tests scores of middle school students. i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology ,2(1), June-August, 2006.
[15]. Taylor, S.E., Frankenpohl, H., White, C.E., Nieroroda, B.W., Browning, C.L. & Birsner, E.P.. EDL Core Vocabularies in Reading, Mathematics, Science and Social Studies. Austin, TX: Steck-Vaughn Company.
[16]. West Virginia Department of Education (2005-2008). Scale scores/Cut scores. Westest Assessment Office. Retrieved on November 21, 2007 from: http://westest. k12.wv.us/pdf/Board%20Report%20cutscores.pdf
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Online 15 15

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.