References
[1]. Abbeduto, L. (2000). Should schools embrace
computers and technology? Taking sides: Clashing views
on controversial issues in educational psychology, 2nd
edition. Guilford, CT: Dushkin/McGraw-Hill.
[2]. Baran, E. & Correia, Ana-Paula (2009). Student-led
facilitation strategies in online discussions. Distance
Education, 30(3), 339-361.
[3]. Bendixen, L. D., Hartley, K., Sas, I. C., & Spatariu, A.
(2003). The impact of epistemic beliefs and
metacognition on online discussions. Paper presented at
the annual meeting of the American Educational
Research Association, Chicago, IL.
[4]. Chang, C. (2009). Using jigsaw collaborative learning
strategy in online discussions to foster a project-based
learning community on the web. International Journal of
Instructional Media, 36(2), 221-233.
[5]. ChanLin, L., Chen, Y., & Chan, K. (2009). Labeled
posting for asynchronous interaction. AACE Journal, 17(4),
317-332.
[6]. Chinn, C. A., & Waggoner, M. A. (1992). Dynamics of
classroom discussion: An analysis of what causes segments
of open discourse to begin, continue, and end. Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting of the American
Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
[7]. Clark, D., D'Angelo, C., & Meneske, M. (2009). Initial
structuring of online discussions to improve learning and
argumentation: Incorporating students' own explanations
as seed comment versus augmented-preset approach to
seeding discussions. Journal of Science Education and
Technology, 18(4), 321-333.
[8]. Coirier, P., Andriessen, J., & Lucille, C. (1999). From
planning to translating the specificity of argumentative
writing. In Andriessen, J., & Coirier, P. (Eds.), Foundations of
argumentative text processing (pp. 1-28). Amsterdam:
Amsterdam University Press.
[9]. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning,
conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative
research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[10]. Erkens, G. (1997). Cooperative problem solving with
computers in education. In Andriessen, J., & Coirier, P.,
(Eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp.
204-207). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
[11]. Gibson, C. C. (2003). Learners and learning: The need
for theory. In Moore, M. G. & Anderson, W. G. (Eds.),
Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 147-161). New
Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[12]. Golder, C., & Pouit, D. (1999). For a debate to take
place the theme must be discussible: Developmental
evolution of the negotiation and admissibility of the
arguments. In Andriessen, J., & Coirier, P. (Eds.), Foundations
of argumentative text processing (pp. 137-148).
Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
[13]. Heenjung, A., Sunghee, S., & Keol, L. (2009). The
effects of different instructor facilitation approaches on
students' interactions during asynchronous online
discussions. Computers and Education, 53(3). 749-760.
[14]. Hsieh, H. F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches
to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health
Research, 15, 1277-1288.
[15]. Jeong, A. (2004). The combined effects of response
time and message content on growth patterns of
discussion threads in computer-supported collaborative
argumentation. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 36-
53.
[16]. Jeong, A., & Joung, S. (2003). The effects of response
constraints and message labels on interaction patterns
and argumentation in online discussions. Paper presented
at the annual meeting of the American Educational
Research Association, San Diego, CA. Retrieved from:
http://dev22448-01.sp01.fsu.edu/Research/Labeling/
Fall2002/AERAProposalScaffolding.pdf
[17]. Jorczak, R. L. & Bart, W. (2009). The effect of task
characteristics on conceptual conflict and information
processing in online discussion. Computers in Human
Behavior, 25(5), 1165-1171.
[18]. Liang, L. L., Jazlin, E., & Yost, D. S. (2010).
Characteristics of pre-service teachers online discourse:
The study of local streams. Journal of Science Education
and Technology, 19(1), 69-79.
[19]. Marijke, S., Hilde, K., Bram, W., Martin, V. (2010).
Studying thought processes of online peer tutors through
simulated-recall interviews. Higher Education 59(5), 645-
661.
[20]. Marra, R. M., Moore, J. L., & Klimczak, A. K. (2004).
Content analysis of online discussion forums: A
comparative analysis of protocols. Educational
Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 23-40.
[21]. Nussbaum, E. M. (2005). The effect of goal instructions
and need for cognition on interactive argumentation.
Educational Contemporary Psychology, 30(3), 286-313.
[22]. Nussbaum, E. M., Hartley, K., Sinatra, G. M., Reynolds,
R. E., & Bendixen, L. (2002). Enhancing the quality of online
discussions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
American Educational Research Association, New Orleans,
LA.
[23]. Richardson, J. C., & Ice, P. (2010). Investigating
students' level of critical thinking across instructional
strategies in online discussions. Internet and Higher
Education, 13(½), 52-59.
[24]. Rourke, L., & Szabo, M. (2002). A content analysis of
the Journal of Distance Education 1986-2000. Journal of
Distance Education, 2002, 17(1), 63-74.
[25]. Spatariu, A., Hartley, K., Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., &
Quinn, L.F. (2007). The Influence of the discussion leader
procedure on the quality of arguments in online
discussions. The Journal of Educational Computing
Research, 37 (1), 85-105.
[26]. So, H. J. (2009). When groups decide to use
asynchronous discussions: Collaborative lear4ning
learning and social presence under a voluntary
participation structure. Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning, 25(2), 143-160.
[27]. Stein, N. L., & Miller, C. A. (1991). I win–you lose: The
development of argumentative thinking. In J. Voss, D.
Perkins, & J. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education
(pp. 265–290). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
Inc.
[28]. Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types
and software tools. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
[29]. Veerman, A. L., Andriessen, J. E. B., & Kanselaar, G.
(1999). Collaborative learning through computermediated
argumentation. In C. Hoadly & J. Roschelle
(Eds.), Proceedings of the third conference on Computer
Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 640-650). Stanford,
CA: Stanford University.
[30]. Veerman, A.L., & Treasure-Jones, T. (1999). Software
for problem solving through collaborative argumentation.
In Andriessen, J., & Coirier, P., (Eds.), Foundations of
argumentative text processing (pp. 203-231). Amsterdam:
Amsterdam University Press.
[31]. Valcke, M., De Wever, B., Zhu, C., & Deed, C. (2010).
Supporting active cognitive processing in collaborative
groups: The potential of Bloom's taxonomy as a labeling
tool. Internet and Higher Education, 12(3/4), 165-172.
[32]. Zhang, T., Koehler, M., Spatariu, A. (2009). The
development of the Motivation for Critical Reasoning in
Online Discussions Inventory (MCRODI). American Journal
of Distance Education, 23(4), 194-211.
[33]. Winiecky, D. J. (2003). Instructional Discussions in
online education: Practical and research oriented
perspectives. In Moore, M. G. & Anderson, W. G. (Eds.),
Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 193-215). New
Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
