References
[1]. Amaral, O., Garrision, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002).
Helping English learners increase achievement through
inquiry-based science instruction. Bilingual Research
Journal, 26(2), 213-239.
[2]. Baker, W. P., Barstack, D. C., Clark, D., Hull, E.,
Goodman, B., & Kook, J. (2008). Writing-to-learn in the
inquiry-science classroom: Effective strategies from
middle school science and writing teachers. Clearing
House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and
Ideas, 81(3), 105-108.
[3]. Carter, A. (2004). Autonomy, inquiry and mathematics
reform. The Constructivist, 15(1), 1-15.
[4]. Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope,
2000(March), 42-44.
[5]. Cronje, J. (2006). Paradigms regained: Toward
integrating objectivism and constructivism in instructional
design and the learning sciences. Educational Technology
Research & Development, 54(4), 387-416.
[6]. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. NY:
Collier.
[7]. Elmore, R. (2000). Building a new structure for school
leadership. The Albert Shanker Institute.
[8]. Fang, Z., L. Lamme, et al. (2008). "Integrating reading
into middle school science: What we did, found, and
learned." International Journal of Science Education
30(15): 2067-2089.
[9]. Ford, D.J. (2009). Promises and challenges for the use
of adapted primary literature in science curricula:
Commentary. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 385-
390. doi: 10.1007/s11165-008-9115-8.
[10]. Galileo Educational Network. (2008). What is inquiry?
Retrieved Sept. 23, 2008, from http://www.galileo.org/
inquiry -what.html
[11]. Gerber, B.L., Price, C., Barnes, M., Hinkle, V., Barnes, L.,
Gordon, P., et al. (2003, March). Excellence in rural science
teaching: Examining elements of professional
development models. Paper presented at the Annual
meeting of the National Association for Research in
Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
[12]. Gordon, M. (2009). Toward a pragmatic discourse of
constructivism: Reflections on lessons from practice.
Journal of the American Educational Studies Association,
45(1), 39-58. doi: 10.1080/00131940802546894.
[13]. Harris, C.J. & Rooks, D.L. (2010). Managing inquirybased
science: Challenges in enacting complex science
instruction in elementary and middle school classrooms.
Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 227-240. doi:
10.1007/s10972-009-9172-5.
[14]. Kleiman, G. M. (2005). Does technology combined
with inquiry-based lessons increase students' learning?
Retrieved September 19, 2006, from http://cosn.org/
resources/edc/vol_1.pdf.
[15]. Knodt, J.S. (2009). Cultivating curious minds: Teaching
for innovation through open-inquiry learning. Teacher
Librarian, 37(1), 15-16.
[16]. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning:
Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge
Press.
[17]. Lee. (2004). Promoting learning through inquiry. Essays
on Teaching Excellence: Toward the Best in the Academy,
15(3), 1-5.
[18]. Lin, C.H. & Matthews, R. (2005). Vygotsky's philosophy:
Constructivism and its criticisms examined. International
Education Journal, 6(3), 386-399.
[19]. Lord, T., & Orkwiszewski, T. (2006). Moving from
didactic to inquiry-based instruction in a science
laboratory. American Biology Teacher, 68(6), 342-345.
[20]. Mahony, M., Wozniak, H., Everingham, F., Reid, B., &
Poulos, A. (2003). Inquiry-based teaching and learning:
What's in a name? Paper presented at the HERDSA.
[21]. Meyer, D.L. (2008). The poverty of constructivism.
Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(3), 332-341. doi:
10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00457.x.
[22]. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). An expanded
sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
[23]. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
[NCTM]. (2000). Principles and Standards for School
Mathematics. Reston, VA.: Author.
[24]. National Research Council. (1996). National science
education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy
Press.
[25]. National Science Foundation. (2005). Foundations: A
Monograph for Professionals in Science, Mathematics,
and Technology Education (Vol. 2): National Science
Foundation.
[26]. Newmann, F., Bryk, A., & Nagaoka, J. (2001).
Authentic intellectual work and standardized tests: Conflict
or coexistence? Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School
Research.
[27]. Phillips, D.C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly:
The many faces of constructivism. Educational
Researcher, 24(7), 5-12.
[28]. Reed, D.K., and C. Groth (2009). "Academic teams
promote cross-curricular applications that improve
learning outcomes." Middle School Journal 40(3): 12-19.
[29]. van Zee, E.H., & Roberts, D. (2006). Making science
teaching and learning visible through web-based
"snapshots of practice". Journal of Science Teacher
Education, 17(4), 367-388.
[30]. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development
of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
[31]. Wilhelm, J.A., & Walters, K.L. (2006). Pre-service
mathematics teachers become full participants in inquiry
investigations. International Journal of Mathematical
Education in Science and Technology, 37(7), 793-804.
[32]. Xu, H., and L. Morris (2007). "Collaborative course
development for online courses." Innovative Higher
Education. 32(1): 35-47.
