A Study Of Designing An Inquiry-Based Unit In Mathematics And Science

Patti Dyjur*, Qing Li**
* Ph.D Candidate, University of Calgary.
** University of Calgary.
Periodicity:March - May'2010
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.5.4.1151

Abstract

This paper looks at the design process of an inquiry-based mathematics and science unit in two urban grade nine classes. Three teachers who teacher in an urban, all-girls’ junior high school collaborated with math/science and educational experts to design and implement the unit. Results showed the following: teachers needed to be flexible regarding the direction of the unit, collaborating with experts helped teachers to design a more authentic unit, topic selection needed to be carefully considered, and that the resulting unit was worthwhile due to its relevance, richness, and increased student interest and ability to make multidisciplinary connections. Issues with this approach included workload, the amount of time required for planning, and a lack of inquiry-based materials in math.

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

Patti Dyjur and Qing Li (2010). A Study Of Designing An Inquiry-Based Unit In Mathematics And Science.i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology. 5(3), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.5.4.1151

References

[1]. Amaral, O., Garrision, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002). Helping English learners increase achievement through inquiry-based science instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 26(2), 213-239.
[2]. Baker, W. P., Barstack, D. C., Clark, D., Hull, E., Goodman, B., & Kook, J. (2008). Writing-to-learn in the inquiry-science classroom: Effective strategies from middle school science and writing teachers. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81(3), 105-108.
[3]. Carter, A. (2004). Autonomy, inquiry and mathematics reform. The Constructivist, 15(1), 1-15.
[4]. Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 2000(March), 42-44.
[5]. Cronje, J. (2006). Paradigms regained: Toward integrating objectivism and constructivism in instructional design and the learning sciences. Educational Technology Research & Development, 54(4), 387-416.
[6]. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. NY: Collier.
[7]. Elmore, R. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. The Albert Shanker Institute.
[8]. Fang, Z., L. Lamme, et al. (2008). "Integrating reading into middle school science: What we did, found, and learned." International Journal of Science Education 30(15): 2067-2089.
[9]. Ford, D.J. (2009). Promises and challenges for the use of adapted primary literature in science curricula: Commentary. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 385- 390. doi: 10.1007/s11165-008-9115-8.
[10]. Galileo Educational Network. (2008). What is inquiry? Retrieved Sept. 23, 2008, from http://www.galileo.org/ inquiry -what.html
[11]. Gerber, B.L., Price, C., Barnes, M., Hinkle, V., Barnes, L., Gordon, P., et al. (2003, March). Excellence in rural science teaching: Examining elements of professional development models. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
[12]. Gordon, M. (2009). Toward a pragmatic discourse of constructivism: Reflections on lessons from practice. Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 45(1), 39-58. doi: 10.1080/00131940802546894.
[13]. Harris, C.J. & Rooks, D.L. (2010). Managing inquirybased science: Challenges in enacting complex science instruction in elementary and middle school classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 227-240. doi: 10.1007/s10972-009-9172-5.
[14]. Kleiman, G. M. (2005). Does technology combined with inquiry-based lessons increase students' learning? Retrieved September 19, 2006, from http://cosn.org/ resources/edc/vol_1.pdf.
[15]. Knodt, J.S. (2009). Cultivating curious minds: Teaching for innovation through open-inquiry learning. Teacher Librarian, 37(1), 15-16.
[16]. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge Press.
[17]. Lee. (2004). Promoting learning through inquiry. Essays on Teaching Excellence: Toward the Best in the Academy, 15(3), 1-5.
[18]. Lin, C.H. & Matthews, R. (2005). Vygotsky's philosophy: Constructivism and its criticisms examined. International Education Journal, 6(3), 386-399.
[19]. Lord, T., & Orkwiszewski, T. (2006). Moving from didactic to inquiry-based instruction in a science laboratory. American Biology Teacher, 68(6), 342-345.
[20]. Mahony, M., Wozniak, H., Everingham, F., Reid, B., & Poulos, A. (2003). Inquiry-based teaching and learning: What's in a name? Paper presented at the HERDSA.
[21]. Meyer, D.L. (2008). The poverty of constructivism. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(3), 332-341. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00457.x.
[22]. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[23]. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA.: Author.
[24]. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[25]. National Science Foundation. (2005). Foundations: A Monograph for Professionals in Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education (Vol. 2): National Science Foundation.
[26]. Newmann, F., Bryk, A., & Nagaoka, J. (2001). Authentic intellectual work and standardized tests: Conflict or coexistence? Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
[27]. Phillips, D.C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5-12.
[28]. Reed, D.K., and C. Groth (2009). "Academic teams promote cross-curricular applications that improve learning outcomes." Middle School Journal 40(3): 12-19.
[29]. van Zee, E.H., & Roberts, D. (2006). Making science teaching and learning visible through web-based "snapshots of practice". Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(4), 367-388.
[30]. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[31]. Wilhelm, J.A., & Walters, K.L. (2006). Pre-service mathematics teachers become full participants in inquiry investigations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(7), 793-804.
[32]. Xu, H., and L. Morris (2007). "Collaborative course development for online courses." Innovative Higher Education. 32(1): 35-47.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.