Self Concept: Should we follow Cognitive or Social Construction with Students with Disabilities?

Laura Rader*
Professor of Special Education, Department of Educational Leadership and Special Education, The City College of New York.
Periodicity:November - January'2010
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.3.3.1076

Abstract

Initial Investigations into the development of self-concept have been largely descriptive and focused primarily on the concept of self-representation, namely, how the me-self evolves across childhood and adolescence. Investigators sought to document developmental differences in self-representation through coding of spontaneously generated descriptions of the self. These efforts identified broad, discontinuous, qualitative skills in how the self was described. However, there was little analysis of the structural organization of self-concept. Interest in self-processes has burgeoned in the past decade within many branches of psychology. Riding on the bandwagon of the cognitive revolution, self-theorists reconceptualized the self as a cognitive construction that is quite functional in bringing organization and meaning to one’s experiences. In addition to psychologists’ emphasis on self-concept, educators have become interested in the implications of self-concept among special populations within the school setting. Thus, this paper explores the common principles across these newer frameworks and provides educators with specific practical implications to use in the classroom.

Keywords

Self-Concept, Physical Disabilities, Adolescents, Special Education.

How to Cite this Article?

Laura Rader (2010). Self Concept: Should We Follow Cognitive Or Social Construction With Students With Disabilities? i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 3(3), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.3.3.1076

References

[1]. Ainsworth, M. (1973). The development of infantmother attachment. In B. Caldwell & Ricciuto (eds). Review of Child development research (Vol. 3. pp. 1-94). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[2]. Ainsworth, M. (1974). Infant-mother attachment and social development. Socialization as a product of reciprocal responsiveness to signals. In M. Richards (Eds). The Integration of the child into the social world (pp. 99- 135). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[3]. Bannister, D., & Agnew, J. (1977). The child's construing of self. In J. Cole (ed). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 26. pp. 99-125). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
[4]. Baumeister, R.F. (1987). How the self became a problem: A psychological adjustment to multiple sclerosis. Social Science and Medicine, 45(3) 411-418.
[5]. Baumeister, R.F. (1993). Understanding the inner nature of low self-esteem: Uncertain, fragile, protective, and conflicted. In R.F. Baumeister (ed). Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 201-218). New York, Plenum.
[6]. Bleiberg, E. (1984). Narcissistic disorders in children. Bulletin of Menninger Clinic, 48, 501-517.
[7]. Berry, J. W. (1994). Disability attitudes, beliefs and behaviors: Overview of an international project in community based rehabilitation. Paper presented at the XII International Congress on Cross-Cultural Psychology, Pamplona, Spain.
[8]. Berzonsky, M. (2004). Identity processing style, selfconstruction and personal epistemic assumptions: Asocial-cognitive perspective. European Journal of Developmental Psychology. 1(4) 303-315.
[9]. Blatt, S. J. (1995). Representational structures in psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & S. Toth (eds). Rochester Symposium on Developmental Psychopathologyy: Emotion, cognition, and representation (Vol. 6, pp. 1-34). Rochester, Ny: University of Rochester Press.
[10]. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss, sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books.
[11]. Bretherton, I. (1991). Pouring new wine into old bottles. The social self as internal working model. In M. R. Gunnar & L.A. Stoufe (Eds). Self processes and development: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Development (Vol. 23, pp. 1-41). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
[12]. Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth, Developmental Psychology, 28, 759-775.
[13]. Byrne, B.M. & Schneider, B.H. (1988). Perceived competence scale for children. Testing for factorial validity and invariance across age and ability. Applied Measurement in Education, 1, 171-187.
[14]. Cambra, C., & N. Silvestre (2003). Students with special needs in the inclusive classroom: social integration and self-concept. European Journal of Special Needs Education Vol. 18, No2 pp 197-208.
[15]. Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. New York: Academic Press.
[16]. Case R. (1992). The mind's staircase. Hillsdale, NJ :Erlbaum.
[17]. Cassiday, J. (1990). Theoretical and methodlogical consideration in the study of attachment and the self in young children. In M. T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E. M. Cummings (Eds). Attachment in the preschool years: Thoery, research and intervention (pp. 87-120). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[18]. Cicchetti, D. (1990). The organization and coherence of socioemotional, cognitive, and representational development. Illustration through a developmental psychopathology perspective on down syndrome and child maltreatment. In R. Thompson(Ed). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Sociemotional development (Vol. 36, pp. 266-375). Loncoln, University of Nebrasks Press.
[19]. Cicchetti, D. (1991). Fractures in the crystal: Developmental psychopathology and the emergence of self. Developmental Review, 11, 271-287.
[20]. Cicchetti, D., & Beeghly, M. (1990). Perspectives on the study of the self in atypical populations. In D. Cicchetti &M. Beeghly (Eds). The self in transition: Infancy in childhood (pp 1-15). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[21]. Coleman, J. M. (1983). Handicapped labels and instructional segregation: Influences on children's selfconcepts versus the perceptions of others. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 3-11.
[22]. Coleman, J.M. (1985). Achievement level, social class, and the self-concepts of mildly handicapped children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 26030.
[23]. Cook, P., Pande, N., Berry, J. W. Samuel, M. Maclachlan, M., & Lie, G.T. (1994). Culture, health and disability. Paper presented at the XII International Conference of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Pamplona, Spain.
[24]. Costanzo, P.R. (1991). Morals, mothers and memories: The social context of developing social cognition. In R.Cohen &R. Siegal (Eds.) Context and development (pp. 91-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[25]. DeLoach, C. (1981). Adjustment to severe disability: Metamorphosis. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
[26]. Epstein, S. (1973). The self-concept revisited or a theory of a theory. American Psychologist, 28, 405-416.
[27]. Epstein, S. (1981). The unity principle versus the reality and pleasure principles, or the tale of the scorpion and the frog. In M.D. Lynch, A.A. Norem-Hebeisen, & K. Gergen (Eds.), Self concept: Advances in theory and research (pp. 82-110). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
[28]. Epstein, S. (1991). Cognition-experimental self theory: Implications for developmental psychology. In M.R. Gunnar & L.A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Development (Vol 23, pp. 111-137). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[29]. Fischer. K.W. (1980), A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87, 477-531.
[30]. Fists, W.H. (1972). The self-concept and behavior : Overview and supplement. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
[31]. Fivush, R. (1987). Scripts and categories: Interrelationships in development. In U. Neisser (Ed.) Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[32]. Gordon, E. W. (1965). Characteristics of socially disadvantaged children. Review of Educational Research, 35, 377-388.
[33]. Graziano, W. G., & Waschull, S.B. (1995). Social development and self-monitoring. In N Eisenberg (Ed.), Social development: Review of personality and social psychology (Vol.15,pp. 233-260). London:Sage.
[34]. Greenwald, A.G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 7, 603-618.
[35]. Guardo, CJ., & Bohan,mJ.B. (1971)0. Development of a sense of self-identity in children. Child Development, 42, 1909-1921.
[36]. Hadley, A.E., E. Hair, & K. Moore, (2008). Assessing what kids think about themselves: A guide to adolescent self- concept for out- of- school time program practitioners. Child Trends, August.
[37]. Harter, S. (1983b). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87-97.
[38]. Harter, S. (1997). The personal self in social context: Barriers to authenticity. In R. D. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), Self and identity: Fundamental issues (pp. 81-105). New York: Oxford University Press.
[39]. Harter, S. (1983b). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87-97.
[40]. Harter, S. (1999). The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. New York: Guilford Press.
[41]. Harter, S., & Renick, M. J. (1988). Manual for the Self- Perception Profile for Learning Disabled Students. Denver: University of Denver.
[42]. Higgins, E. T. (1991). Development of self-regulatory and self-evaluative processes: Costs,benefits, and tradeoffs, In M.R. Gunnar & L.A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development. The Minnesota Symposia on Child Development (Vol. 23, pp. 125-166), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[43]. Higgins, E. T., Klien, R., & Strauman, T. (1985). Selfconcept discrepancy theory: A Psychological model for distinguishing among different aspects of depression and anxiety. Social Cognition, 3, 51-76.
[44]. Kapp-Simon, K. (1986) Self-concept and the retarded: Research and issues. Exceptional Children, 39, 310-319.
[45]. Kernberg, O. F. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Aronson.
[46]. Kihlstrom, J.F. (1993). What does self look like? In T.K Srull & R.S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), The mental representation of trait and autobiographical knowledge about the self: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 5, pp. 79-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[47]. Kistner, J., Haskett, M., White, K., & Robbins, F. (1987). Perceived competence and self-worth of LD and normally acheiving students. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 10, 37- 44.
[48]. Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press.
[49]. Lawrence, E., & Winschel, J. (1973). Self-concept and the retarded: Research and issues. Exceptional Children, 39, 310-319.
[50]. Markus, H. (1980). The self in thought and memory. In D.M. Weggner & R.R. Vallacher (Eds). The self in social psychology (pp 42-69). New York: Oxford University Press.
[51]. Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamis selfconcept: A social psychological perspective. In M.R. Rosenweig & L.W. Porter (eds). Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.
[52]. MCquire, W. (1981). The spontaneous self-concept as affected by personal distinctiveness. In A.A. Norem- Hebeisen & M. Lynch (Eds). Self-concept (pp 211-239). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
[53]. Montemayor, R., & Eisen, E.I. (1977). The development of self-conceptions from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 13, 314-319.
[54]. Mullener, N., & Laird, JD. (1971). Some developmental changes in the organization of selfevaluations. Developmental Psychology, 5, 233-236.
[55]. Nelson, K. (1986). Event Knowledge: Structure and function in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[56]. Nelson, K. (1993). Events, narratives, memory, What develops? In CA Nelson (Ed), Memory and affect: Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (Vol, 26, pp. 124). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
[57]. Pande, N. (1994). Attitudes and beliefs about physical disability: A cross-cultural study. Paper presented at the XII International Congress of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Pamplona, Spain.
[58]. Pande, N., Dalai, A. (1994). A study of attitudes and beliefs about physical disability in rural communities. Paper presented at the XII International Congress of Cross- Cultural Psychology. Pamplona, Spain.
[59]. Pascual-Leone, J. (1988). Organismic processes for neo-Piagetian theories: A dialectical Piagetian casual account of cognitive development. In A Demetrious (Ed.), The neo Piagetian theories of cognitive development: Toward Integration (pp. 25-65). Amsterdam: North Holland: Elsevier.
[60]. Pipp, S. (1990). Sensorimotor and representational internal representation: working models of self, other and relationship: Mechanisms of connection and separation. In D. Cicchetti & M. Beeghly (Eds), The self in transition: Infancy to childhood (pp. 243- 264). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[61]. Renick, M.J. & Harter, S. (1989). Impact of social compasisions on the developing self-perceptions of learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 631 -638.
[62]. Rogoff, B. n(1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
[63]. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
[64]. Siegler, R.S. (1991). Children's thinking (2 ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[65]. Silverman, R.G., & Zigmond, N. (1983). Self-concept in LD adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 478-482.
[66]. Snow, K. (1990). Building memories: The ontogeny of autobiography. In D. Cicchetti & M. Beeghly (eds.), The self in transition: Infancy to childhood (pp. 213-242). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[67]. Sroufe, L.A. (1990) An organizational perspective on the self. In D. Cicchetti & M. Beeglhy (eds.) The self in transition: Infancy to childhood (pp.281-308). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[68]. Steele, C.M. (1988). The psychology of selfaffirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In.L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). San Diego: Academic Press.
[69]. Strang, L., Smith, M.D., & Rogers, C.M. (1978). Social comparison, multiple reference groups, and the selfconcepts of academically handicapped children before and after main streaming, Journal of Educational Psychology, 29, 171-180.
[70]. Tam, S.F. (1991) Self-concept and correlates of Hong Kong Chinese who have physical disabilities. Journal of the Hong Kong Association of Occupational Therapists, 5, 4-16.
[71]. Tam, S.E. (1988). Self-concept and employment status among physically disabled in Hong Kong (Unpublished master's thesis). Macau: University of East Asia.
[72]. Tam. S.F. (1995b) Exploring measuring and enhancing the self-concepts of the Hong Kong Chinese adults with physical disability (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Hong Kong ; University of Hong Kong.
[73]. Tam, S.F. (1998). Comparing the self-concepts of persons with and without physical disabilities. Journal of Psychology, 132, 78-87.
[74]. Tam, S.F. & Watkins, D. (1995). Towards a hierarchical model of self-concept for Hong Kong Chinese adults with physical disabilities. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 1-17.
[75]. Tollefson, N. (1982). Attribution patterns of learningdisabled adolescents. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 14-20.
[76]. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mental development of children and the process of learning (M. Lopez Morillas, Trans.). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), L.S.Vygotsky: Mind and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Original work published 1935).
[77]. Winnicott, D.W. (1965). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. NewYork: International/ universities Press.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Online 15 15

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.