The focus of this paper is on knowledge-building in a technology-supported learning environment in higher education through a longitudinal study of a graduate course from 2003 to 2007. The primary question is: how do learning conditions designed into a graduate course contribute to collaborative knowledge building? In particular, two major issues -- theory acquisition and the ethics related to technology -- are explored. The result indicates that the blended learning approach has proved to be particularly helpful in enhancing students' learning of more abstract ideas such as theory and philosophy. In addition, a holistic design of the course and its assignment has fostered collaborative knowledge building. Two special concerns are identified. First, students' group work needs to be flexible enough in order to promote learning and motivation. Second, appropriate integration of threaded discussion should consider the amount of work involved.

">

Collaborative Knowledge-building: A longitudinal study

Qing Li*
Associate Professor, Faculty of Education, University of Calgary, Canada
Periodicity:October - December'2009
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.6.3.1064

Abstract

The focus of this paper is on knowledge-building in a technology-supported learning environment in higher education through a longitudinal study of a graduate course from 2003 to 2007. The primary question is: how do learning conditions designed into a graduate course contribute to collaborative knowledge building? In particular, two major issues -- theory acquisition and the ethics related to technology -- are explored. The result indicates that the blended learning approach has proved to be particularly helpful in enhancing students' learning of more abstract ideas such as theory and philosophy. In addition, a holistic design of the course and its assignment has fostered collaborative knowledge building. Two special concerns are identified. First, students' group work needs to be flexible enough in order to promote learning and motivation. Second, appropriate integration of threaded discussion should consider the amount of work involved.

Keywords

Collaborative Knowledge Building, Technology, Longitudinal Study, Graduate Course.

How to Cite this Article?

Qing Li (2009). Collaborative Knowledge-Building: A Longitudinal Study. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 6(3), 42-57. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.6.3.1064

References

[1]. Bielaczyc, K., & and A. Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 269-292).. C. M. Reigeluth. Mahwah NJ:, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 269-292.
[2]. Brown, A., & and J. Campione, J. (1990). "Communities of learning and thinking, or a context by any other name.." Developmental perspectives on teaching and learning thinking skills., 21,: 108-126.
[3]. Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools for Thought: A Science of Learning in the Classroom., The MIT Press.
[4]. Collis, B., K. Winnips, et al. (2000). "Structured support versus learner choice via the World Wide Web: Where is the payoff? Jounal?" Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(2),): 131-162.
[5]. Driscoll, M. (1994). Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston, MA:, Allyn & Bacon.
[6]. Duffy, T., & and D. Cunningham, D. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. D. H. Jonassen. NY:, Macmillan.
[7]. Fischer, G., M. Rohde, M., & Woulf, Vet al. (2007). "Community-based learning: The core competency of residential, research-based universities." International Journal of Computer Supported-Collaborative Learning, 2(1),): 9-40.
[8]. Gilbert, N., & and M. Driscoll, M. (2002). "Collaborative knowledge building: A case study.." Educational Technology Research and Development., 50(1),): 59-79.
[9]. Hannafin, M., & and J. Hill, J. (2002). Epistemology and the design of learning environments. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 70-82).. R. A. Reiser and J. V. Dempsey. Upper Saddle River, NJ:, Prentice Hall: 70-82.
[10]. Hannafin, M., S. Land, et al. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. Instructional-design theories and models. C. M. Reigeluth. Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum. II.
[11]. Jonassen. (2006). "A constructivist perspective on functional contextualism.." Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(1),): 43-47.
[12]. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. Instructional design theories and models. C. M. Reigeluth. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. II.
[13]. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. NJ:, Prentice Hall.
[14]. Kanuka, H. and T. Anderson (1998). "Online social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction." Journal of distance education 13(1): 57-74.
[15]. Keller, J. M. (1987). "The systematic process of motivational design.." Performance and instruction quarterly, 26(9),): 1-8.
[16]. Lebow, D., W. Wager, W., Marks, P., & Gilbert, N.et al. (1996, June). Construe: Software for collaborative learning over the World Wide Web. Paper presented at the AECT/FSU conference on distance learning, Tallahassee, FL.
[17]. Li, Q. (2005). "Infusion technology into a mathematics methods course: Any impacts??" Educational Research, 47(2),): 217-233.
[18]. McGilly, K. (1994). Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Instruction. Cambridge, MA., MIT Press.
[19]. Miles, M. and A. Huberman (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.:., Sage Publications.
[20]. Pea, R. (2002). Learning science through collaborative visualization over the Internet. Paper presented at the Nobel Symposium, Stockholme, Sweden.
[21]. Savery, J. R., & and T. Duffy, T. (1995). "Problem Based Learning: An insructional model and its constructivist framework.." Educational Technology, 35(5),): 31-38.
[22]. Scardamalia. (2003). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67-98).. B. Smith. Chicago:, Open Court: 67-98.
[23]. Scardamalia, & and C. Bereiter, (1994). "Computer support for knowledge building communities." The Journal of the learning sciences 3(3): 265-283.
[24]. Scardamalia and C. Bereiter (1999). Schools as knowledge-building organizations. In D. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds.), Today's children, tomorrow's society: The developmental health and wealth of nations (pp. 274- 289).. D. Keating and C. Hertzman. NY:, Gilford: 274-289.
[25]. Scardamalia, & and C. Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge Building. In Encyclopedia of Education (2 ed., pp. 1370-1373). NY:, Macmillan Reference, USA: 1370- 1373.
[26]. Von Glasersfeld, E. (2000). Radical constructivism and teaching. Geneva:, Archives Jean Piaget.
[27]. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
[28]. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identify. NY, Cambridge University Press.
[29]. Young, G. (1997). Adult development, therapy, and culture: A postmodern synthesis. New York, Plenum Press.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.