i-manager Publications

Tourists Perception and Satisfaction with cultural / Heritage sites:Chittoor District in Andhra Pradesh

0*, D.V. Ramana**

* Lecturer, Department of Commerce, S.V. Arts UG & PG College, Tirupati, India.

** Professor, Department of Business Management, S.V. University, Tirupati, India.

Periodicity:September - November'2009
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.4.2.1060

Abstract

Cultural/heritage tourism is the fastest growing segment of the tourism industry because there is a trend toward an increased specialization among tourists. This trend is evident in the rise in the volume of tourists who seek adventure, culture, history, archaeology and interaction with local people (Bob MCkercher, 2002 PP.262). Especially, Indian tourists’ interest in traveling to cultural/ heritage destinations has increased recently and is expected to continue. For example, cultural/heritage sites are among the most preferred tourism experiences in AndhraPradesh.

The recent studies about cultural/heritage tourism focused on the characteristics of tourists who visited cultural/heritage destinations. The study attempts to investigate the relationship between cultural/heritage destination attributes and tourist satisfaction, and to identify the relationship between cultural/heritage destination attributes and tourist satisfaction in terms of selected tourists’ demographic characteristics and travel behavior characteristics.

The expectancy-perception theory provided a conceptual framework for this study. The expectancy-perception theory holds that consumers first form expectations of products or service performance prior to purchasing or use. Subsequently, purchasing and use convey to the consumer beliefs about the actual or perceived performance of the product(s) or service(s). The consumer then compares the perceived performance to prior expectations. Consumer satisfaction is seen as the outcome of this comparison (Philip kolar 2006).

The study area for this study was Andhra Pradesh in cultural and heritage sites. Furthermore, it is one of world’s popular destination is Lord Venkateshwara attracting more than 8 Million tourists each year. The data of this study were collected from the on-site survey method. The sample population for this study was composed of tourists who visited popular tourist attractions in Andhra Pradesh between January and June in 2009. The survey was conducted at five different sites in Andhra Pradesh. Out of 500 questionnaires, 462 were usable. Therefore, the data from 251 respondents were analyzed in this study.

Appropriate statistical analyses such as frequencies, descriptive, factor analysis, correlation analysis, multiple regressions, Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA), Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) were used according to respective objectives and descriptors.

The factor analysis was conducted to create correlated variable composites from the original 28 attributes. Using factor analysis, 25 destination attributes resulted to four dimensions: General Tour Attraction, Heritage Attraction, Maintenance Factors, and Culture Attraction. These four factors then were related with overall satisfaction. Correlation analysis revealed that four factors were correlated with tourists’ overall satisfaction. The multiple regression analysis revealed that there was relationship between cultural/heritage destination attributes and tourists’ overall satisfaction. MANOVA revealed that there was significant difference between derived factors in relation to only total household income and the length of stay among 10 demographic and travel behavior characteristics. ANOVA revealed that there is a significant difference in the overall satisfaction of tourists by gender, past experience, and decision time to travel. Finally, MANCOVA revealed that only one of the control variables (past experience) controlled the relationship between the overall satisfaction of tourists and derived factors.

Based upon the results of this study, several recommendations can be made to increase tourists’ satisfaction with Andhra Pradesh. First, comprehending what tourists seek at cultural/heritage attractions will help tourism marketers better understand their customers.

Second, identifying which attributes satisfy the tourist who visit cultural/heritage destinations will help tourism planners develop appropriate strategies to attract their customers and serve them effectively.

Third, knowing who the satisfied tourists are may help reduce marketing costs and maintain cultural/heritage destinations’ sustainability.

Keywords

Cultural/Heritage Tourism, Tourist Perceptions, Tourists Satisfaction levels.

How to Cite this Article?

T.L. Narasimha Reddy and D.V. Ramana (2009). Tourists Perception and Satisfaction With Cultural /Heritage Sites: Chittoor District in Andhra Pradesh. i-manager’s Journal on Management, 4(2), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.4.2.1060

References

[1]. Anderson, V, Prentice, R, and Guerin, S (1997). Imagery of Denmark among \visitors to Denish time arts exhibitions in Scotland. Tourism Management, 18(7), pp.453-464.

[2]. Andhra Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation (2008) Annual Report of APTDC.

[3]. Ahuja S.P, S.R.Sarna, inder sharma (1977) Tourism in India: A perspective to 1990 P.29 Institute of Economic and Market Research.

[4]. Balcar, M. & Pearce, D. G. (1996). Heritage tourism on the West Coast of New Zealand. Tourism Management, 17(3), pp.203-212.

[5]. Barsky & Labagh (1992). A Strategy for Customer Satisfaction. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly. Oct.:32-40.

[6]. Churchill, G. A. Jr. & C. Surprenant. (1983). Marketing Research: Methodological Foundation. Chicago: The Dryden Press.

[7]. Clemons, Sott D. & Woodruff, Robert B. (1992). Broadening the view of Consumer (Dis) Satisfaction: A proposed Means – end Disconfirmation model of CS/D. American Marketing Association, (Winter), pp.413-421.

[8]. Crompton, J.L. & Love, L.L. (1995). The predictive validity of alternative approaches to evaluating quality of a festival. Journal of Travel Research, 33, pp.11-24.

[9]. E., & Schmidt, FL (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting for error and bias in research findings. Newbury park, CA : Sage Nunnally, 1967.

[10]. Gunn, C. (1988). Tourism Planning: Basics, Concepts, and Case. Third Edition.

[11]. Formica, S. & Uysal, M. (1998). Taylor and Francis. Washington, DC. Market Segmentation of an International Cultural-Historical Event in Italy. Journal of Travel Research, 36, pp.16-24.

[12]. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tathan, R., & Black, W. (1999). th Multivariate data analysis with readings (4 ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

[13]. Heung, V.C.S. & Cheng, E. (2000). Assessing tourists' satisfaction with shopping in the Hong Kong special administrative region of China. Journal of Travel Research, 38, pp.396-404.

[14]. Hollinshead, K. (1993). Encounters in Tourism. VNR's Encyclopedia of Hospitality and Tourism. pp.636-651.

[15]. Indian Tourism Annual Report ,(2008-09) Yearly report

[16]. Janiskee, R.L. (1996). Historic Houses and Special Events. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2): pp.398-414.

[17]. Joppe, M., Martin, D.W., & Waalen, J. (2001). Toronto's image as a destination: A comparative importance-satisfaction analysis by origin of visitor. Journal of Travel Research, 39, pp.252-260.

[18]. Lee, C. (1999). Investigating tourist attachment to selected coastal destination: An application of place attachment. Clemson University.

[19]. Light, D. & Prentice, R. (1994). Market-based product development in heritage tourism. Tourism Management, 15(1), pp.27-36.

[20]. Light, D. (1996). Characteristics of the audience for events' at a heritage site. Tourism Management, 17(3), pp.183-190.

[21]. Nuryanti, W. (1996). Heritage and Postmodern tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), pp.249-260.

[22]. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive Model for the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, (27), pp.460- 69.

[23]. Oliver, R. L. & W. O. Bearden. (1985). Disconfirmation Processes and Consumer Evaluations in Product Usage. Journal of Business Research. 13: pp.235-246.

[24]. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. & Berry, L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(Fall), pp.41- 50.

[25]. Patterson, P.G. (1993). Expectations and product performance as determinants of satisfaction for a highinvolvement purchase. Psychology & Marketing, 10(5), pp.449-465.

[26]. Peleggi:, Maurizio (1996). National heritage and global tourism in Thailand. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), pp.340-364.

[27]. Peterson, K. (1994). The heritage resource as seen by the tourist: The heritage connection. In (ed.) van Harssel, J. Tourism: an Exploration, Third Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

[28]. Philipp, Steven F. (1993). Racial differences in the perceived attractiveness of tourism destinations, interests, and cultural resources. Journal of Leisure Research, 25(3), pp.290-304.

[29]. Philip kolar review edition 2006). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall International.

[30]. Pizam, A., Neumann, Y. & Reichel, A. (1978). Dimensions of tourist satisfaction with a destination. Annals of Tourism Research, 5, pp.314-322.

[31]. Richards, G. (1995). Production and Consumption of European Cultural Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 22(2), pp.261-283.

[32]. Silberberg, T. (1995). Cultural tourism and business opportunities for museums and heritage sites. Tourism Management, 16(5), pp.361-365.

[33]. Zeppel, H. & Hall, C. (1992). Arts and heritage tourism. In Weiler, B. & Hall, C. (eds.) Special Interest Tourism. London: Belhaven, pp.47-68.

Tourists Perception and Satisfaction with cultural / Heritage sites:Chittoor District in Andhra Pradesh

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content:

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25