New Teachers and Technology Preparation: Immersion or Infusion?

Paul Egeland*
Associate Professor, Department of Education, Wheaton College, Wheaton, Illinois, United States of America.
Periodicity:September - November'2009
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.5.2.1024

Abstract

In the 21st Century, it is imperative for new teachers to be well prepared for utilizing technology to enhance instruction and increase student learning. While this is true for all teacher education programs it may be more challenging for those steeped in the liberal arts. With an emphasis on thinking liberally and understanding a breadth of knowledge from across the disciplines, adding separate educational technology courses to the already robust program certification requirements is difficult. Some teacher preparation programs have succumbed to this pressure and require all teacher certification candidates to enroll in and pass a course designed for the use of educational technology. This immersion approach ensures all teacher candidates are introduced to the use of technology in education. In a small, liberal arts institution, the author and his colleagues have chosen a different path. Although it requires tremendous coordination and communication, we infuse our curricular content and methods courses with technology so that it is in context and concert with the actual content and pedagogy. This article will examine the current research and explore the advantages and disadvantages of such an approach in preparing undergraduates for teacher certification. The specifics of the context will provide further reasons why this infusion approach appears to be the most effective for preparing teacher candidates to successfully use educational technology.

Keywords

Teacher Preparation, Learning Technology, Philosophies.

How to Cite this Article?

Paul Egeland (2009). New Teachers and Technology Preparation: Immersion or Infusion?. i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology. 5(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.5.2.1024

References

[1]. Beisser, S. R. (1999). Infusing technology in elementary social studies methods. In SITE 99: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education th International Conference (10 , San Antonio, TX, February 28-March 4, 1999). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 432 294)
[2]. Bennett, L., & Berson, M. J. (Eds.). (2007). Technologybased K-12 lesson plans for social studies. Silver Spring, MD: National Council for the Social Studies.
[3]. Bird, T., & Rosaen, C. L. (2005). Providing authentic contexts for learning information technology in teacher preparation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 211-231.
[4]. Corporation for Public Broadcasting. (2003). Connected to the future: A report on children's Internet use from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
[5]. Cradler, J. (2003). Technology's impact on teaching and learning. Learning and Leading with Technology, 30(7), 54-57.
[6]. Dexter, S., Doering, A. H., & Riedel, E. (2006). Content area specific technology integration: A model for educating teachers. Journal of technology and teacher education, 14(2), 325-345.
[7]. Dexter, S. & Riedel, E. (2003). Why improving preservice teacher educational technology preparation must go beyond the college's walls. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 334-346.
[8]. Franklin, C. A., & Molebash, P. E. (2007). Technology in the elementary social studies classroom: Teacher preparation does matter. Theory and Research in Social Education, 35(2), 153-173.
[9]. Hatch, T., Sun, C., Grossman, P., Neira, P., & Change, T. (2009). Learning from the practice of veteran and novice teachers: A digital exhibition. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 68-69.
[10]. ISBE, (2001). Content-area standards for educators: Making Illinois schools second to none. Springfield, IL: Illinois State Board of Education.
[11]. ISTE, (2002). National educational technology standards for teachers: Preparing teachers to use technology. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
[12]. Jonassen, D. H. (2006). Modeling with technology: Mindtools for conceptual change. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
[13]. Klecker, B. M., Lennex, L., & Lackner, K. (2003). Evaluating the integration of technology in a teacher preparation program. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association (Columbus, OH, October, 2003). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 481 667)
[14]. Lambert, J., Gong, Y., & Cuper, P. (2008). Technology, transfer and teaching: The impact of a single technology course on preservice teachers' computer attitudes and ability. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 385-410.
[15]. Liu, J. M. (2001). Integrating educational technology into field experiences and teacher education curriculum - - A systemic approach. In Annual Proceedings of Selected Research and Development [and] Practice Papers Presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational th Communications and technology (24 , Atlanta, GA, November 8-12, 2001). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 470 192)
[16]. McKenzie, J. (1999). How teachers learn technology best. Bellingham, WA: FNO Press.
[17]. Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage.
[18]. Ravitz, J., Wong, Y., & Becker, H. (1999). Report to participants. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. Retrieved August 19, 2009, from: http://crito.uci.edu/papers/TLC /findings/special_report/index.htm.
[19]. Russell, M., Bebell, D., O'Dwyer, L., & O'Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297-310.
[20]. Santos, G. E., Santos Jr., A. G., & Milliron, M. D. (2003). From digital divide to digital democracy. Phoenix, AZ: League for Innovation in the Community College.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.