Participating in small group activities has emerged as a trend in online learning events. However, little is known about how graduate students experience online group work and what instructional behaviors are perceived as helpful during the group process. This article discusses a qualitative research project that revealed how online health care professionals in two graduate studies programs valued knowing their facilitator was consistently present and available. The project was framed from a constructivist theoretical perspective and a descriptive research design. Participants were health care practitioners who graduated from a Master of Nursing or Master of Health Studies program offered exclusively through a WebCT online environment. Data sources included two focus groups and ten individual audio-tape recorded transcribed interviews. The data was analyzed for themes by two researchers and confirmed with participants through ongoing member checking. The following strategies for creating a safe and engaging online learning climate for members of small project groups are presented. 1) Create groups intentionally. 2) Intervene with non-contributing members. 3) Measure individual contributions.

">

Online Graduate Study Health Care Learners' Perceptions Of Group Work And Helpful Instructional Behaviors

Kim Bergeron*, Sherri Melrose**
* Research Assistant, Centre for Nursing and Health Studies, Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada.
** Assistant Professor, Centre for Nursing and Health Studies, Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada.
Periodicity:April - June'2006
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.3.1.1012

Abstract

Participating in small group activities has emerged as a trend in online learning events. However, little is known about how graduate students experience online group work and what instructional behaviors are perceived as helpful during the group process. This article discusses a qualitative research project that revealed how online health care professionals in two graduate studies programs valued knowing their facilitator was consistently present and available. The project was framed from a constructivist theoretical perspective and a descriptive research design. Participants were health care practitioners who graduated from a Master of Nursing or Master of Health Studies program offered exclusively through a WebCT online environment. Data sources included two focus groups and ten individual audio-tape recorded transcribed interviews. The data was analyzed for themes by two researchers and confirmed with participants through ongoing member checking. The following strategies for creating a safe and engaging online learning climate for members of small project groups are presented. 1) Create groups intentionally. 2) Intervene with non-contributing members. 3) Measure individual contributions.

Keywords

WebCT, Group Based Teaching.

How to Cite this Article?

Kim Bergeron and Sherri Melrose (2006). Online Graduate Study Health Care Learners' Perceptions of group work and Helpful Instructional Behaviors. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.3.1.1012

References

[4]. Bates, A.W. & Poole, G. (2003). Effective teaching with technology in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
[5]. Chickering, A. W, and Gamson, Z. F (Eds.), (1991). Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no.47. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[6]. Collison. G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S. & Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood.
[7]. Davis, B. G. (1993). Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[8]. Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[9]. Diekelmann, N. & Mendias, E. (2005). Being a supportive presence in online courses: Attending to students' online presence with each other. Journal of Nursing Education, 44(9), 393-395.
[10]. Ehrlich, D.B. (2002). Establishing connections: Interactivity factors for a distance education course. Educational Technology & Society 5(1), 48-54.
[12]. Hativa, N. & Goodyear, P. (Eds.) (2002). Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
[13]. Kearsley, G. & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement Theory: a framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38, 20-23.
[14]. Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (2vols). New York: Norton.
[15]. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computersupported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335-353.
[16]. Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inuiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[17]. McKeachie, W.J. & Hofer, B. (Eds) (2002). McKeachie's teaching tips: Strategies, research and theory for college th and university teachers (11 ed.) Boston: Houghton-Mifflin
[18]. Melrose, S. (2006, in press). Facilitating help-seeking through student interactions in a WebCT online graduate study program. Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences.
[19]. Melrose, S. & Bergeron, K. (2006, in press). Online graduate study health care learners' perceptions of instructional immediacy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (IRRODOL).
[20]. Melrose, S., Shapiro, B., LaVallie, C. (2005). Helpseeking experiences of health care learners in a WebCT online graduate study program. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(2), 5-21.
[21]. Murray, M.H. & Lonne, B. (2006). An innovative use of the web to build graduate team skills. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(1), 63-77.
[22]. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.
[23]. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge-Falmer.
[24]. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.