A Comparison of Students' Attitudes between Computer Software Support and Traditional Laboratory Practical Learning Environments in Undergraduate Electronics Science

S.S. Khandewale*, Y. B. Gandole**, R.A. Mishra***
*Sharda Vihar' Amravati ( India)
** (Department Of Electronics, Adarsha Science, J.B.Arts and Birla Commerce,Mahavidyalaya,Dhamangaon Rly.-444 709(India))
*** (Department Of Electronics, Amlokchand Mahavidyalaya,Yavatmal (India)).
Periodicity:November - January'2006
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jfet.1.2.962

Abstract

The purpose of this experimental study was to see the effect of Computer software support on the attitude towards electronics subject of students while working in laboratory of electronics science. In this experimental study there were two groups as experimental group and control group. The experimental group performed the experiments using computer software support for selected practical in electronics, while controlled group was studied by traditional method. The target population consisted of students offering electronics subject in undergraduate science streams. The sample was students who attended the Electronics achievement test at four selected science colleges affiliated in Amravati University Amarvati (Maharashtra State- INDIA). There were 150 students used as the sample in the study.The investigator developed an attitude scale having 25 items by covering various aspects related to electronics experiments and laboratory communication. There were 21 positive and four negative items on five-point scale (Likert type). The difference of points in pre test and posttest decided the change in Attitude. The findings showed that the computer software support used for laboratory communication was much effective in bringing an attitudinal change among the students. There was a remarkable enhancement in attitude for all items.

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

S. S. Khandewale, Y. B. Gandole and R. A. Mishra, (2006). A Comparison Of Students' Attitudes Between Computer Software Support And Traditional Laboratory Practical Learning Environments In Undergraduate Electronics Science. i-manager’s Journal on Future Engineering and Technology, 1(2), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.26634/jfet.1.2.962

References

Ausubel, David P. (1968). Educational Psychology, A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Best John W. (1978) Research in Education ( 3rd Edition), Prentice-Hall of India Private Ltd. New Delhi.
Brasell, H. (1987). The effect of real-time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,24(4), 385-395.
Brungardt, J. B., & Zollman, D. (1995). “Influence of interactive videodisc instruction using simultaneous-time analysis on kinematics graphing skills of high school physics students.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8), 855-869
Busch, T. (1996) “Ge n d e r, g ro u p c omp o s i t i o n , cooperation, and self-efficacy in computer studies.” Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15(2), 125- 135.154
C.R.Kothari ( 1987) Research methodology ( Methods and techniques), Viley eastern Ltd..
Campbell,J.O., & Gibbons, A.S. (1994) Progressively challenging evaluative simulations that provide assessment.learning, and performance support.Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems,8(2),25-28.
Casey, P. (1997). Computer programming: a medium for teaching problem solving. Computers in the Schools, 13(1-2), 41-51.
Chee, Y. S. (1995).Cognitive apprenticeship and its application to the teaching of Smalltalk in a multimedia interactive learning environment. Instructional Science, 23(1-3), 133-161.
Comber, C., Colley, A., Hargreaves, D. J., & Dorn, L. (1997). The effects of age, gender, and computer experience upon computer attitudes. Educational Research, 39(2), 123-133.
Dawes, R.M. (1972). Fundamentals of attitude measurement. New York: John Wiley &Sons, Inc.
Denning, R., & Smith, P. J. (1997). Cooperative learning and technology. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(2/3), 177-200.
Dewhurst DG, Meehan AS. (1993) Evaluation of the use of computer simulations of experiments in teaching undergraduate students. Br J Pharmacol Proc Suppl 108:238P.
Dodge, B. (1991).Computers and creativity: Tools, tasks, and possibilities.Communicator: The Journal of the California Association for the Gifted, 21 (1), 5-8.
Edwards, J.; Norton, S.; Taylor, S.; Weiss, M.; and Dusseldorp, R. (1975) “How Effective is CAI? A Review of the Research.” Educational Leadership 33/2 : 147- 153.
Faryniarz,J.V. ,& Lockwood, L.G. (1992) Effectiveness of microcomputer simulations in stimulating environmental problem solving by community college students .Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29(5),453-470
Garcia, J. R. (1995). Use of technology in developing problem-solving/critical thinking skills. Journal of Industrial Technology, 11(1), 14-17.
Gokhale, A. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer simulation versus lab, and sequencing of instruction, in teaching logic circuits. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 29(1), 1-12.
Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 201-217.
Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Stanne, M. B. (1986). Comparison of computerassisted cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. American Educational Research Journal. 23, 382-392.
Kelly, G. J., & Crawford, T. (1996). Students’ interaction with computer representations: analysis of discourse in laboratory groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 693-707.
Kulik, C.-L. C. & Kulik, J. A. (1986). Effectiveness of computer-based education in colleges. AEDS Journal, 19, 81-108.
Lawton, J., and Gerschner, V. T. (1982) “A Review of the Literature on Attitudes Towards Computers and Computerized Instruction.” Journal of Research and Development in Education 16/1 (1982): 50-55.
Magnusson, S. J., & Palincsar, A. (1995). The learning environment as a site of science education reform. Theory into Practice, 34(1), 43-50.
Pokay, P. A., & Tayeh, C. (1997). Integrating technology in a geometry classroom: issues for teaching. Computers in the Schools, 13(1-2), 117-123.
Quinn, C. N. (1993). Cognitive skills and computers: Framing” the link. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Thinking, Townsville, Australia.
Rajamony, N. (1988) “The emerging concepts of educational Technology” , Expertiments in Education, Vol. 16 No. 11 ( November).
Redish, Edward, Saul, Jeffrey, Steinberg, Richard. (1996) “On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer-based laboratories. American Journal of Physics”
Reeves, T.C. (1998). The impact of media and technology in schools: A research report prepared for The Bertelsmann Foundation. Retrieved January 28, 2002,
Reif, F. & Scott, L. (1999). Teaching scientific thinking skills: Students and computers coaching each other. American Journal of Physics. 67(9), 819-831.
Repman, J. (1993). Collaborative, computer-based learning: cognitive and affective outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 9(2), 149-163.
Rivers, R. H., & Vockell, E. (1987). Computer simulations to stimulate scientific problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(5), 403-415.
Thomas, R. A., & Hooper, E. (1989). Simulations: An opportunity we are missing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Association for Computing in Education, San Francisco, CA.
Thomas Froese (1994) “Computer-Assisted Instruction in Civil Engineering”,Computing in Civil Engineering: Proceedings of the First Congress, Khalil Khozeimeh, Ed., ASCE, Washington, D.C. Vol. 2, pp
Woolf, B., & Hall, W. (1995). Multimedia pedagogues: Interactive systems for teaching and learning. IEEE Multimedia, 74-80.
Y.B.Gandole (2005) “Changing the nature of Undergraduate electronics science practical work” , International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance learning, Vol. 2. No. 4, 9-22.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.