An Enhanced WSD Approach for Improving Terminological Issues in Process Models

S. Jyoshna*, K. Delhi Babu**
* M.Tech Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sree Vidyanikethan Engineering College, Tirupati, India.
** Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sree Vidyanikethan Engineering College, Tirupati, India.
Periodicity:July - September'2016
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jse.11.1.8193

Abstract

Nowadays detecting and resolving lexical ambiguities are difficult tasks in the business process models. Business process models represent all functions of a business activity in a sequential order. So business process models should not hold any terminological issues there has been lack of techniques to handle the problem of ambiguity in words due to synonyms and homonyms. In existing work, a technique called word sense disambiguation based on babelnet was used to detect and resolve the lexical ambiguities. Word sense disambiguation is a method for finding correct meaning of an ambiguous word. Babelnet is one of the widely used lexical resource that combine both wordnet and Wikipedia to identify the different meanings of the ambiguous words automatically. In addition to the existing work, the authors proposed a domain driven disambiguation approach that uses wordnet domain to find the domain information about a word automatically to detect and resolve the lexical ambiguity in business process models.

Keywords

Business Process Models, Lexical Ambiguity Identification, Lexical Ambiguity Resolution

How to Cite this Article?

Jyoshna, S., and Babu, K. D., (2016). An Enhanced WSD Approach for Improving Terminological Issues in Process Models. i-manager’s Journal on Software Engineering, 11(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.26634/jse.11.1.8193

References

[1]. Fabian Pittke, Henrik Leopold, and Jan Mendling, (2015). “Automatic detection and resolution of lexical ambiguity in process models”. IEEE Trans. Soft. Eng. Vol. 41. pp. 526-544. 13
[2]. E. Kamsties, (2005). “Understanding ambiguity in requirements engineering”. In Engineering and Managing Software Requirements, A. Aurum and C. Wohlin, Eds. New York, NY, USA: Springer. pp. 245–266.
[3]. C. Denger, D. M. Berry, and E. Kamsties, (2003). “Higher Quality Requirements Specifications through Natural Language Patterns”. In Proc. IEEE Int. Softw. Sci., Technol. Eng, pp. 80–90.
[4]. B. Gleich, O. Creighton, and L. Kof, (2010). “Ambiguity Detection: Towards a Tool Explaining Ambiguity Sources”. In Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality. New York, NY, USA: Springer. pp. 218–232.
[5]. E. Kamsties and B. Peach, (2000). “Taming Ambiguity th in Natural Language Requirements”. In Proc. 13 Int. Conf. Softw. Syst. Eng. Appl., pp. 89–101.
[6]. Y. Wang, I. L. M. Gutierrez, K. Winbladh, and H. Fang, (2013). “Automatic Detection of Ambiguous Terminology for Software Requirements”. In Natural Language Processing Information Systems. New York, NY, USA: Springer. pp. 25–37.
[7]. R. Navigli, (2009). “Word Sense Disambiguation: A Survey”. ACM Comput. Surveys, Vol. 41. pp. 1–69.
[8]. P. Pantel and D. Lin, (2002). “Discovering Word Senses th from Text”. In Proc. 8 ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discovery Data Mining, pp. 613–619.
[9]. E. Agirre and D. Martinez, (2000). “Exploring Automatic Word Sense Disambiguation with Decision Lists and the Web”. In Proc. Coling Workshop Semantic Annotation Intell. Content. pp. 11–19.
[10]. R. Navigli and S. P. Ponzetto, (2012). “Multilingual WSD with just a few Lines of Code: The BabelNet API”. In Proc. ACL Syst. Demonstrations. pp. 67–72.
[11]. S. P. Ponzetto and R. Navigli, (2010). “Knowledge-rich Word Sense Disambiguation Rivaling Supervised Systems”. th In Proc. 48 Annu. Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguistics. pp. 1522–1531.
[12]. G. A. Miller, (1995). “WordNet: A Lexical Database for English”. Commun. ACM, Vol. 38, pp. 39–41.
[13]. J. Mendling, (2009). “Empirical Studies in Process Model Verification”. In Transaction on Petri Nets and other Models of Concurrency II, New York, NY, USA: Springer. Vol. 2, pp. 208–224.
[14]. F. Chantree, B. Nuseibeh, A. De Roeck, and A. Willis, (2006). “Identifying Nocuous Ambiguities in Natural th Language Requirements”. In Proc. IEEE 14 Int. Conf. Requirements Eng. pp. 59–68. 14
[15]. Zhong and H.T. Ng, (2012). “Word Sense Disambiguation th Improves Information Retrieval”. In Proc. 50 Annu. Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguistics. pp. 273–282.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.