References
[1].Boshein, B, J,, Morkus, M, L. ond Riley, R C I 994)
'Preconditions for BPR Success', Informofion Systems
Monogement,Spring,7-13.
[2].Belmonte, R. W. ond Murroy, R, J. (1993) 'Getting stoned for
sfrotegic chonge- Surviving business process redesign',
InformotlonSystemsMonogement,Summer,23-29.
[3].Brodley, R C I 996) 'A Performonce Meosurement Approoch
to the Re-engineering of Monufocturlng Enterprises', PhD.
Thesis, CIMRU, University College Golwoy Golwoy
[4].Burke, W. W. (1987) 'Instltutlonsol Development: A
normotive view. Reodlng(Mossochuseffs): AddlsIon-
Wesley.
[5].Burnes, B, (1996) 'Monoglng Chonge.. A Strofegic
Approach to Inst`Ifuflonol Dynomics (2nd Ed.}'. London:
PlfmonPublishing
[6].Burns, T. ond Stolker, G. (1961) 'The Monogement of
innovotion'. London.' Tovlstock. Chompy, J. ond Nohrlo, N.
Business School Press.
[7].Dooiey, L. (199 7) 'A Study of Radical Change Programmes
inlrishlndustry,
[8].M.CommerceThesis, Dept. of Accountancy and Finance,
National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway.
[9].Eccies, R. G. and Nohria, N. ( I 992) 'Beyond the fad . Boston.'
HarvardBusinessSchoolPress.
[10].Hali, D. J. (1997) 'Instltutionsal Change: Klnetlc theory and
instilufionsal resonance', The Journal of Technologlcal
Innovation and Entrepreneurship , Technovation, 17, 1, 11-24.
[11].Hammer, M. (1990) Re-engineering work: Don't
automate, obliterate', Harvard Business Review, July-August, 104-112
[12].Hammer, M. and Stanton, S. A. C I 995) 'The Reengineering
Revolution-TheHandbook'. London: Harper Collins.
[13].Hayes, R, H., Wheelwright, S. C. and Clarke, K. B, (1988)
'Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the learning
institutions'. NewYork: The Free Press.
[14].Juran, J, M. (1993) 'Quality Planning and Analysis'. London:
Kotter, J. R (1990) 'A force for change: How leadership
dlffers from management . New York: The Free Press.For
diverse imperalfves, such as technological mandates,
public dissatisfaction with Educational Management
Systems (EMSs], Influence of responsible onllne
communication workers, and the usefulness of evaluation
resulfs through a critical approach Is beingperformed not
only with increasing frequency, but also with growing
quality in empowering online communications. Besides,
any EMSs are made a good deal of evaluation process in
sophistication of meticulous analyses before they are
broadly adopted Not only must EMSs address practical
and technlcal issues, but also they must concentrate on
the philosophy of Interaclfve online communications by
critically revising ultimate goals and also objects of online
programs. Needless to say, the evaluation of EMSs Is a
complex process, and can be effort-wasting and time-
consuming business easily. In this context, online
communication workers are capable of clearly
understanding that "...curriculum Is what we teach;
education is how we teach it; and evaluation guides the
process. . . (Howell,Foxand Morehead, 1993,p.1)".
