English language teachers’ implementation of curriculum with action-oriented approach in Turkish primary education classrooms

P. Yeni-Palabiyik*, A. Daloglu**
* Faculty of Education, Department of Foreign Language Education, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
** Professor, Department of Foreign Language Education, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Periodicity:April - June'2016
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.6.2.5980

Abstract

The aim of the study is to explore English language teachers' implementation of a curriculum innovation with an actionoriented approach in the context of teaching English to very young learners in Turkish primary schools. As a part of exploratory case study design, data from multiple sources were gathered in the form of observational field notes, followup interviews and document analysis. Findings indicated a variation in teachers' instructional practices ranging from traditional to constructivist. Even if factors such as presence of instructional materials and facilities of the school influenced the implementation, this study indicated that the teacher is the main factor in effective delivery of any imposed change. Besides, the positive influence of proficiency in subject-matter knowledge and curricular knowledge to achieve coherence between the intended and delivered curriculum was revealed. The results showed that providing an ongoing support and including teachers in the process of curriculum development helped to promote the effective implementation of the curriculum innovation.

Keywords

Curriculum Implementation, Primary Education, Teaching English To Young Learners, Action-oriented Approach, Case Study

How to Cite this Article?

Yeni-Palabiyik, P., and Daloglu, A. (2016). English Language Teachers' Implementation of Curriculum with Action-Oriented Approach in Turkish Primary Education Classrooms. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 6(2), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.6.2.5980

References

[1]. Anderson, A. S. (1997). “Understanding teacher change: Revisiting the concerns based adoption model”. Curriculum Inquiry, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 331–367.
[2]. Arum, J. N. (2015). “Availability and utilization of instructional materials for the implementation of the new biology curriculum in senior secondary schools in Lagos, Nigeria”. Sky Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 3, No. 7, pp. 78-86.s
[3]. Bayraktar, B. (2014). “Evaluation of the English curriculum for second classes in primary schools according to teachers' opinions”. (Unpublished master's thesis). Uludag University, Institute for Educational Sciences, Bursa.
[4]. Carless, D. R. (2001). “Curriculum innovation in the primary EFL Classroom: Case studies of three teachers implementing Hong Kong's target-oriented curriculum (TOC)”. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/36390
[5]. Castro, A. F. (2013). “Making sense of curriculum change: Teachers' perspectives implementing a communicative English language curriculum at the tertiary level in the Dominican Republic”. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/ repository/ handle/ 10871/13102
[6]. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry Research rd Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3 ed.) London: SAGE Publications.
[7]. Donmez, O. (2010). “Implementation of the new eight grade English language curriculum from the perspectives of teachers and students”. (Unpublished master's thesis). Middle East Technical University, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Ankara.
[8]. El-Okda, M. (2005). “A proposed model for EFL Teacher involvement in on-going curriculum development”. Asian EFL Journal, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 33-49.
[9]. Fullan, M., and Pomfret, A. (1977). “Research on curriculum and instruction implementation”. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 335-393.
[10]. Fullan, M. (1997). Successful School Improvement: The implementation Perspective and Beyond. Buckingham: Oxford University Press.
[11]. Ghanney, R. A. (2008). “The use of instructional materials in the teaching and learning of environmental studies in primary schools: A case study of Winneba”. International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 135-140.
[12]. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Aldine Transaction.
[13]. Hord, S. M., Rutherford, W. I., Huling-Austin, L., & Hall, G. E. (1987). “Taking charge of change: Association for supervision and curriculum development”. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
[14]. Khoboli, B., and O'toole, J. (2012). “The concernsbased adoption model: Teachers' participation in action research”. Syst Pract Action Res, Vol. 25, pp. 137-148.
[15]. Kirkgoz, Y. (2008a). “A case study of teachers' implementation of curriculum innovation in English language teaching in Turkish primary education”. Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 24, pp. 1859–1875.
[16]. Kirkgoz Y. (2008b). “Curriculum innovation in Turkish primary education”. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 309–322.
[17]. Larson-Hall, J. (2008). “Weighing the benefits of studying a foreign language at a younger starting age in a minimal input situation”. Second Language Research, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 35–63.
[18]. Li, M. (2010). “EFL teachers and English language education in PRC: Are they the policy makers?”. The Asia- Pacific Education Researcher, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 439- 451.
[19]. Ministry of National Education (MoNE), (2006). IlkogretimkurumlariIng ilizcedersiogretimprogrami [The curriculum for English lesson in primary education institutions]. Istanbul: MilliEgitimBasimevi.
[20]. Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2013). Ilkogretimkurumlari (ilkokullarveortaokullar) Ingilizcedersiogretimprogrami [The curriculum for English lesson in primary education institutions (primary schools and secondary schools)]. Ankara: MilliEgitim Basimevi.
[21]. Orafi, S., & Borg, S. (2009). “Intensions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform”. System, Vol. 37, pp. 243–253.
[22]. Orafi, S. (2013). “Effective factors in the implementation of ELT curriculum innovations”. Scientific Research Journal, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 14-21.
[23]. Stockton, M. (2009). “Meeting the demands of a new curriculum philosophy: A study of the challenges of curriculum implementation for small rural schools in New Zealand”. (Unpublished master's thesis). Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland.
[24]. Su, Y.-C.(2006). “EFL teachers' perceptions of English language policy at the elementary level in Taiwan”. Educational Studies, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 265-283.
[25]. Topkaya, E. Z., and Kucuk, O. (2010). “An evaluation th th of the 4 and 5 grade English language teaching program”. Elementary Education Online, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 52-65.
[26]. Wang, H., & Cheng, L. (2005). “The impact of curriculum innovation on the cultures of teaching”. Asian EFL Journal, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 7-32.
[27]. Wang, H. (2008). “Language policy implementation: A look at teachers' perceptions”. Asian EFL Journal, pp.1- 25. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/ pta_August_08.pdf
[28]. Wang, H., & Cheng, L. (2009). “Factors affecting teachers' curriculum implementation”. The Linguistics Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2 , pp. 135-166.
[29]. Wang, H. (2010). “Translating policies into practice: The role of middle-level administrators in language curriculum implementation”. The Curriculum Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 123-140.
[30]. Yanik, A. (2007). “A study of English language th th th curriculum implementation in 6 , 7 and 8 grades of public primary schools through teachers' and students' perceptions”. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Ankara.
[31]. Yildiran, C.,and Tanriseven, I. (2015). “Teachers' opinions on the English curriculum of the 2nd grade primary education”. International Journal of Language Academy, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 210-223.
[32]. Yildiz, E. (2006). “The implementation of constructivism in English language teaching for Turkish learners”. (Unpublished master's thesis). Selcuk University, Institute for Social Sciences, Konya.
[33]. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and rd Methods (3 ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.