Improving the Asynchronous Online Learning Environment Using Discussion Boards

Ilene Ringler*, Carol Schubert**, Jack Deem***, Jimmie Flores****, Jill Friestad-Tate*****, Robert Lockwood******
* Professor, MBA program, Kaplan University.
** Professor, Graduate School of Business and Information Technology, Kaplan University.
*** Academic Department Chair, School of Business and Information Technology, Kaplan University.
**** Professor, School of Business and Information Technology, Kaplan University.
***** Adjunct Professor, Graduate School of Business and Information Technology, Kaplan University.
****** Professor, School of Graduate Education, Kaplan University.
Periodicity:April - June'2015
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.1.3432

Abstract

Discussion Boards are at the heart of an Asynchronous Online Learning or Distance Education Environment and can have a great impact on the learning experience. Understanding the individual factors that create a high quality discussion board experience for students and their interrelationships is critical to continuous improvement in distance education. Research which contributes to increased effectiveness of virtual Discussion Boards for both instructors and students can result in greater student involvement and success in learning new skills.

This paper discusses Phase 1 and 2 of a multi phase applied research effort on improving the quality of virtual Discussion Boards. “Applied research is defined as systematic study to gain knowledge or understanding necessary to determine the means by which a recognized and specific need may be met” ("Research and development," 2010, para 4). The study was completed in two phases with additional phases to be developed as the data analysis continues to yield results. In Phase 1, a literature review was completed and qualitative data employing a focus group methodology was completed. The focus group was comprised of full time faculty from a large, proprietary, online university with significant experience in the use of Discussion Boards. The data was collected from the focus group and was analyzed to create hypotheses for additional research on the topic. Phase 2 focused on collecting data utilizing a quantitative research methodology supported by continued research of the literature on this topic. The results of the data analyzed during these phases will become the basis for additional studies on recommended best practices in discussion board participation as it applies to both the student and the instructor.

Keywords

Discussion Board, Online Learning Virtual Classroom, Blooms Taxonomy, Asynchronous Online Learning, Distance Education

How to Cite this Article?

Ringler,,I., Schubert, C., Deem, J., Flores,J., Friestad-Tate, J., and Lockwood, R. (2015). Improving the Asynchronous Online Learning Environment Using Discussion Boards. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.1.3432

References

[2]. Ayiro, L. P. (2012). A Functional Approach to Educational Research Methods and Statistics : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Lewiston, N.Y.: Edwin Mellen Press.
[3]. Leary, M. R., &Baumeister, R. F.(1997). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews. Review of General Psychology, Vol.1, No3, pp.311-320.
[4]. Bender, T. (2003). Discussion Based online Teaching to Enhance Student Learning: Theory Practice and Assessment. Sterling, Va: Stylus Publishing.
[5]. Birch, D., &Volkov, M. (2007). Assessment of online reflections: Engaging English Second Language (ESL) students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol.23, No.3, pp.291-306.
[6]. Bliss, C., & Lawrence, B. (2009). “Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? A comparison of small group and whole class discussion board activity in online courses”. Journal Of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol.13, No.4, pp.25-39.
[7]. Bloom, B. S., and D. R. Krathwohl (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York: Longmans, Green.
[8]. Cheung, W., Hew, K., & Ling Ng, C. (2008). “Toward an understanding of why students contribute in asynchronous online discussions”. Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol.38, No.1, pp.29-50.
[9]. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2002). Business Research Methods (8th ed.). Boston: Irwin.
[10]. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
[11]. Freeman, J. (2014). Using Discussions in Online Courses: The Importance of Interactivity. Retrieved April 23, 2014, from http://academics.utep.edu/Portals/844/nofo/Using%20Discussions%20in%20Online%20Courses.pdf
[12]. Gilbert, P. & Dabbagh, N. (2005). “How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: A case study”. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol,36, No.1, pp. 5-18.
[14]. Hutcheson, G. D., &Moutinho, L. (2011). The Sage Dictionary of Quantitative Management Research. Los Angeles: SAGE
[15]. Marshall, M.N. (1996). Sampling for Qualitative Research. Family Practice, Vol.13, No.6, pp.522-525.
[17]. Mooney, M., Southard, S., & Burton, C. (2014). “Shifting from Obligatory Discourse to Rich Dialogue: Promoting Student Interaction in Asynchronous Threaded Discussion Postings”. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, XVII.
[18]. Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[19]. Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[21]. Rovai, A. (2006). “Facilitating Online Discussions Effectively”. Internet and Higher Education, Vol.10, pp.77-88
[23]. Salkind, N. J. (2003). Exploring Research (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: NJ. Prentice Hall.
[24]. Sandelowski, M. (1995). “Focus on qualitative methods. Sample size in qualitative research”. Research in Nursing & Health, Vol.18, No.2, pp.179-83. Retrieved January 1, 2008, from Ebscohost database.
[27]. K. L., Rankin, J. A., & Ali, E. (2014). “Focus Group Research: What Is It and How Can It Be Used?”.Canadian Journal Of Cardiovascular Nursing, Vol.24, No.1, pp.16-22.
[28]. Tolhurst, H., Dean, S. (2004). “Using teleconferencing to enable general practitioner participation in focus groups”. Primary Health Care Research & Development, Vol.5, No.1, pp.1-4.
[30]. Xie, K., Debacker, T.K. & Ferguson, C. (2006). Extending the Traditional Classroom through Online Discussion: The Role of Student Motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol.34, No.1, pp.67-89.
[31]. Xie, K., Durrington, V., & Yen, L. (2011). “Relationship between students' motivation and their participation in asynchronous online discussions”. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, Vol.7, No.1, pp.17-29.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.