Does smart classroom an effective technology for teaching: a research Analysis

Ananta Kumar Jena*
Department of Educational Sciences, Assam University, Silchar, Assam, India..
Periodicity:April - June'2013
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.10.1.2304

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the elementary school students’ perception towards the traditional over smart classroom instruction. In the present study, hundred elementary school students from two Indian schools have been randomly selected as the sample of the study. The learners’ perception scores were analyzed by chi-square and Univariate factor analysis techniques. It was found that traditional instructional strategy, and the teachers’ knowledge, modes of transaction, skill of presentation, use of the blackboard, illustration with examples, questioning, reinforcement, and the feedback was comparatively better than smart class instruction.

Keywords

Blackboard; Depth Of Knowledge; Feedback; Questioning, Reinforcement; Skill Of Presentation; Smart Class; Teaching Process; Traditional Class

How to Cite this Article?

Jena , A. K. (2013). Does Smart Classroom An Effective Technology For Teaching: A Research Analysis. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.10.1.2304

References

[1]. Banilower, E., & Shimkus, E. (2004). Professional development observation study. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.v.
[3]. Clarke D, Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education ,18:947–967.
[4]. Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). Studying teacher education: What we know and need to know. Journal of Teacher education, 56(4), 301–306.
[5]. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294–343.
[6]. Embi, Z. C. Hussain, H. (2005). Analysis of Local and Foreign Edutainment Products--An Effort to Implement the Design Framework for an Edutainment Environment in Malaysia. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science teaching, 24(1), 27-42.
[7]. Ghani, A.S. (2009). Cooperative Learning Versus The Lecture Method of Instruction in An Introductory Statistics Course. Journal Sains Dan Matematik , 1(1), Malaysia.
[8]. Glazerman, S., Dolfin, S., Bleeker, M., Johnson, A., Isenberg, E., Lugo- Gil, J. (2008). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Results from the first year of a randomized control study (NCEE 2009–4034). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
[9]. Grierson, A.L & Tiffany, L.G. (2009). Seeing is believing: creating a catalyst for teacher change through a demonstration classroom professional development initiative. Professional Development in Education, 35 (4), 567-584.
[10]. Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning, Media, and Technol-ogy, 32, 283-301.
[11]. Jacob, B., & Lefgren, L. (2004). The impact of teacher training on student achievement: Quasi-experimental evidence from school reform efforts in Chicago. Journal of Human Resources, 39(1), 50–79.
[12]. Jena, A.K. (2011a). Concept mapping as a constructivist approach for meaning making in science learning and attitude among elementary school children. An Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar.
[13]. Jena, A.K. (2011b). Students' perception towards teachers' depth of knowledge inventory, unpublished tool, Assam University, Silchar, Assam, India.
[15]. Linn, M. C., Husic, F., Slotta, J.D., & Tinker, R. (2006). Technology Enhanced Learning in Science (TELS): Research Programs. Educational Technology, 46(3), 54-68.
[16]. Little, J.W. (1993). Teachers' Professional Development in a Climate of Educational Reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15: 129-151. (REF. OKAY).
[17]. Lui, M., Tissenbaum, M., Slotta, J.D. (2011). Scripting Collaborative Learning in Smart Classrooms: Towards Building Knowledge Communities surface learning.
[18]. Manny-Ikan, E., Dagan, O., Tikochinski, T.B., Rachel Zorman, R. (2011). Using the Interactive White Board in Teaching and Learning – An Evaluation of the SMART CLASSROOM Pilot Project. Interdisciplinary, Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, Volume 7, 2011, IJELLO, special series of Chais Conference 2011 best papers.
[19]. Marzano, R., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. (2001). Classroom Instruction that Works. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[21]. Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2005). Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science. Journal of research in Science teaching, 42(7), 767-790.
[22]. Nir, A., & Bogler, R. (2008). The antecedents of teacher satisfaction with professional development programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 377–386.
[23]. Ozer Kendig, E. (2010). Inclusion of Technology in the classroom and How It Influences teaching Practice and Student Engagement (ED519510) ProQuest LLC, Ed.D. Dissertation, Wilmington University Delaware.
[24]. Pearcy, M, Duplass, J. A. (2011). Teaching History: Strategies for Dealing with Breadth and Depth in the Standards and Accountability Age (EJ92245 Social Studies, 102(3), 110-116.
[25]. Rescigno, R. C. (1988). Practical Implementation of Educational Technology. The GTE/GTEL Smart-Classroom. The Hueneme School District Experience. ERIC, No. Ed313007.
[28]. Slotta, J. D., & Aleahmad, T. (2009). WISE technology lessons: Moving from a local proprietary system to a global open source framework. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(2), 169–189.
[29]. Smart, K.L., Cappel, J.J. (2006). Students' Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparative Study. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 201-219.
[30]. Smith, F., Hardman, F., & Higgins, S. (2006). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 443–457.
[32]. Suo, Y., Miyata, N., Morikawa, H., Ishida, T. (2009). Open Smart Classroom: Extensible and Scalable Learning System in Smart Space Using Web Service Technology. CIEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering. 21( 6),June.
[33]. Thomas, J.M. (2002). Technology Levels and teaching American Government. ERIC.
[36]. Tornabene, L. (1998). The SMART Classroom Verses the Traditional Classroom: What the Student's Are Saying. (Ed421963).
[37]. Van den Blink, C. (2009). Uses of Labs and Learning Spaces. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 32 (1) 2009.
[38]. Weiss,K. (2009). Low-no tech teaching: what we lose in the smart classroom. URL:aabss.org/../... pp 1-6 Accessed 17.08.2012.
[42]. Young, J.R. (2009). When Computers Leave Classrooms, so Does Boredom (EJ853097).Chronicle of Higher Education, 55 (42).
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.