Advanced multimedia techniques offer significant learning potential for students. Dale (1946, 1954, 1969) developed a Cone of Experience (CoE) which is a hierarchy of learning experiences ranging from direct participation to abstract symbolic expression. This paper updates the CoE for today’s technology and learning context, specifically focused on the use of multimedia in education. The new hierarchy, called the Multimedia Cone of Abstraction (MCoA), has fewer primary levels than the CoE but many more total levels because of multiple potentialsublevels. The purpose of the MCoA is to help instructional designers of educational content to select appropriate multimedia for each learning context.

">

A Proposed Multimedia Cone of Abstraction: Updating a Classic Instructional Design Theory

Charles E. Baukal*, Floyd B. Ausburn**, Lynna J. Ausburn***
*-**-*** Occupational Education, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma
Periodicity:January - March'2013
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.9.4.2129

Abstract

Advanced multimedia techniques offer significant learning potential for students. Dale (1946, 1954, 1969) developed a Cone of Experience (CoE) which is a hierarchy of learning experiences ranging from direct participation to abstract symbolic expression. This paper updates the CoE for today’s technology and learning context, specifically focused on the use of multimedia in education. The new hierarchy, called the Multimedia Cone of Abstraction (MCoA), has fewer primary levels than the CoE but many more total levels because of multiple potentialsublevels. The purpose of the MCoA is to help instructional designers of educational content to select appropriate multimedia for each learning context.

Keywords

Multimedia Cone of Abstraction, Dale’s Cone of Experience, Instructional Design, Virtual Reality, Animation, Video, Text, Audio, Symbols, Graphics

How to Cite this Article?

Baukal, C. E., Ausburn , F. B., and Ausburn , L. J. (2013). A Proposed Multimedia Cone of Abstraction: updating a Classic Instructional Design Theory. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.9.4.2129

References

[1]. Ausburn, F. B., & Ausburn, L. J. (2008a). Sending students anywhere without leaving the classroom: Virtual reality in CTE. Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers, 83(7), 43-46.
[2]. Ausburn, L. J., & Ausburn, F. B. (2008b). Effects of desktop virtual reality on learner performance and confidence in environment mastery: Opening a line of inquiry. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 45(1), 54-87.
[3]. Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[4]. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G.J. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (ed.), Recent Advances in Learning and Motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). New York, NY: Academic Press.
[5]. Butcher, K. R. (2006). Learning from text with diagrams: Promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 182-197.
[6]. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
[7]. Clark, R. C., & Lyons, C. (2011). Graphics for learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
[8]. Counts, Jr., E. L. (2004). Multimedia Design and Production for Students and Teachers. Boston: Pearson.
[9]. Dale, E. (1946). Audiovisual methods in teaching. New York: Dryden Press.
[10]. Dale, E. (1954). Audiovisual methods in teaching (Rev. ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
[11]. Dale, E. (1969). Audiovisual methods in teaching. New York: Dryden Press.
[12]. Fletcher, J. D., & Tobias, S. (2005). The multimedia principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 117-133). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[13]. Hegarty, M. (2004). Dynamic visualizations and learning: Getting to the difficult questions. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 343-351.
[14]. Höffler, T. N. (2010). Spatial ability: Its influence on learning with visualizations – a meta-analytic review, Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 245-269.
[15]. Höffler, T.N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722-738.
[16]. Höffler, T.N., Prechtl, H., & Nerdel, C. (2010). The influence of visual cognitive style when learning from instructional animations and static pictures. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 479-483.
[17]. Kalyuga, S. (2005). Prior knowledge principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 325-337). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[18]. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. (2004). When redundant on-screen text in multimedia technical instruction can interfere with learning. Human Factors, 46(3), 567-581.
[19]. Kozma, R.B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179-211.
[20]. Lewalter, D. (2003). Cognitive strategies for learning from static and dynamic visuals. Learning and Instruction, 13, 177-189.
[21]. Lin, H. & Dwyer, F.M. (2010). The effect of static and animated visualization: A perspective of instructional effectiveness and efficiency. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 155-174.
[22]. Lohr, L. L. (2008). Creating Graphics for Learning and Performance: Lessons in Visual Literacy. (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ and Columbus, OH: Pearson, Merrill Prentice Hall.
[23]. Lowe, R.K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(2), 225-244.
[24]. Lowe, R.K. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13, 157-176.
[25]. Mayer, R.E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125-139.
[26]. Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[27]. Mayer, R.E., Hegarty, M. Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 256-265.
[28]. Mayer, R.E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 87-99.
[29]. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Rinehart and Winston.
[30]. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
[31]. Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution: A duel coding theoretical approach. New York: Psychology Press.
[32]. Pett, D., & Wilson, T. (1996). Color research and its application to the design of instructional materials. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 19-35.
[33]. Richey, R., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2011). The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge.
[34]. Rieber, L.P. (1991). Animation, incidental learning, and continuing motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 318-328.
[35]. Schnotz, W., Böckheler, J., & Grzondziel, H. (1999). Individual and co-operative learning with interactive animated pictures. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(2), 245-265.
[36]. Seels, B. (1997). The relationship of media and ISD theory: The unrealized promise of Dale's Cone of Experience. Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1997 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Albuquerque, NM, February 14-18, 1997.
[37]. Smith, S.M., & Woody, P.C. (2000). Interactive effect of multimedia instruction and learning styles. Teaching of Psychology, 27(3), 220-223.
[38]. Subramony, D. P. (2003). Dale's Cone revisited: Critically examining the misapplication of a nebulous theory to guide practice. Educational Technology, 43(4), 25-30.
[39]. Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.
[40]. Sweller, J., Ayres, P. & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.
[41]. Tufte, E. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
[42]. Tversky, B., Morrison, J.B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(4), 247-262.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.