References
[1]. Beck, M. L. (1998a). L2 Acquisition and Obligatory Head Movement: English-speaking learners of German and the local impairment hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 311-348.
[2]. Beck, M. L. (ed.)(1998b). Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge. In Assessment of the full transfer account, Hyun Kyung Bong. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[3]. Epstein, S., Flynn, S., & Martohadjono, G. (1996). Second language acquisition: theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 19, 677-758.
[4]. Eubank, L. (1993). On the transfer of parameter values in L2 development. Language Acquisition. 3, 183-208.
[5]. Eubank, L. (1994). Optionality and the initial state in L2 development. In T. Hoekstra and B.D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[6]. Halle, M. & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.) The view from building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[7]. Haznedar, Belma. (2003). Missing Surface Inflection in Adult and Child L2 Acquisition. In Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2002), ed. Juana M. Liceras et al., 140-149. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. www.lingref.com, document #1038.
[8]. Haznedar, B. and Schwartz, B. (1997). Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In proceedings of 21st Annual Boston University Conference on language development.
[9]. Hawkins, R. and Chan, C. (1997). The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: the ‘failed functional features hypothesis'. Second language Research 13, 187-226
[10]. Ionin, T. and Wexler, K. (2002). Children learning English: task and overgeneration of Be. In proceedings of SLRF (2000) Bonch-Bruevich et al. (eds.) Cascadilla Press.
[11]. Lardiere, D. (1998). Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14(4), 359-375.
[12]. Lardiere, D. (1998) Case and tense in the `fossilized' steady state. Second Language Research,14, 1-26.
[13]. Lardiere, D. (2000). Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In Assessment of the full transfer account, Hyun Kyung Bong.
[14]. Lardiere, D. and Schwartz, B.D. (1997). Feature-marking in the L2 development of deverbal compounds. Journal of Linguistics, 33, 327-353.
[15]. Meisel, J. (1991). Principles of universal grammar and strategies of language learning: some similarities and differences between first and second language acquisition. In The acquisition of object clitics and definite articles: evidence from Italian as L2 and L1.Leonini, C. (2006).
[16]. Okuwaki, N. (2006). Realization of inflectional morphology and syntactic knowledge: the investigations into the use of morphology by Japanese speakers learning Engliish. University of Essex: Department of language and linguistics.
[17]. Prevost, P. and White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in SLA? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103- 133.
[18]. Sundquist, J. D. (2005). The mapping problem and missing surface inflection in Turkish-German interlanguage. IN proceedings of 7th German Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA).
[19]. White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
