A Diagnostic Study of the Difficulties of Using Web Based Instruction (Wbi) At College Level

Abdulkarim A. Al Saif*
Assistant Professor, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia.
Periodicity:April - June'2012
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.9.1.1813

Abstract

The aim of this study is to diagnose the difficulties and discouraging factors impinging upon the use of distance education practically Web Based Instruction (WBI) by students at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia. 442 students from seven university colleges interested in WBI were asked about how far a set of factors outlined in the study discourage them from the use of distance education in general and web-based instruction (WBI) in particular as a supplement to the traditional classroom lecture/lab approach. Apparently if such difficulties or discouraging factors are neutralized, the students will be better motivated to use distance education and web-based instruction. The research used questionnaires to determine the influence of the factors in question upon student's use of distance education and (WBI). The major findings of the study indicate that the difficulties or factors discouraging students from using distance education and (WBI) were negatively correlated with technology skills and use. the participants have good to very good computer and Internet skills. Thus, it was found that the computer and Internet skills and use were correlated with age, the technology skills and use were correlated with gender, and the technology skills and use correlated with colleges.

Keywords

Diagnose, Discouraging Factors, Encouraging Factors, Distance Education, Technology Use, Study Tasks, Internet Skills.

How to Cite this Article?

Abdulkarim A. Al Saif (2012). A Diagnostic Study Of The Difficulties Of Using Web Based Instruction (WBI) At College Level. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.9.1.1813

References

[1]. Al-Erieni, S. (1999). Attitudes of King Saud University faculty toward development and Implication of a telecommunications-based distance education program as an alternative to conventional teaching. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, George Mason University, Virginia.
[2]. Al-Hussein. (2004, July 18). Distance Education and Web Training(2004, July 18). Al Riyadh Newspaper, p 13-16
[3]. Al-Saif, A. A. (2005). The Motivating and Inhibiting Factors Affecting the Use of Web-Based Instruction (WBI) at Qassim University. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Wayne State University, Detroit.
[4]. Arbaugh, J.B. (2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in webbased courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 42-54.
[5]. Carey, S,& Crittenden, E (2000). Using technology to foster authentic communication for second language students, Proceedings of the technological and national development conference .(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed447277).
[6]. Chan and Russell, (2007). Factors Affecting Student Participation in the Online Learning Environment at the Open University of Hong Kong. Journal of Distance Education . Spring 2007. Vol. 21, No. 3, 23-38.
[7]. Central Department of Statistics and Information, (2012). Retrieved on January,15,2012, from http://www.cdsi.gov.sa/
[8]. Cole, R S, Todd, J B, Fedosky, E W , & Moore, J W (2000). Using WebCT to re-design a large freshman class. th Proceedings of the 16 Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning ,USA, 113-118.
[9]. Corderoy, R. M., & Cooper, P. (2000). The development of an online problem based leanring environment to support the development of engineering professional practice skills: The virtual engineering consultancy company (VECC). Indian Journal of Online Learning, 9(3), 339 350.
[10]. Daugherty M and Fnke B L (1998). Univrsity faculty and student perceptions of web-based instruction. Journal of Distance Education 13 (1) 21-39.
[11]. Duvall, C. K., & Schwartz, R. G. (2000). Distance education: Relationship between academic performance and technology adult students. Education and Information Technologies, 5(3), 177-187.
[12]. Distance Education and Web Training (2004). Al Riyadh Newspaper, p 13-16,July 18.
[13]. Eastmond, N., & Du Plessis. (2000). An incremental approach to implement a web course. TechTrends, 44(3), 40-45.
[14]. Gary, Sharon. (1997). Training teachers, faculty members, and staff. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web Based Instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
[15]. Hayes, B. G., & Robinson III, E. H. (2000). Accessing counselor education students' attitudes toward computers and multimedia instruction. Journal of Global Information Management, 7(1), 26-38.
[16]. Hofmann, D. W. (2002). Internet-based distance learning in higher education. Tech Directions, 62(1), 28-32.
[17]. Hong, K-S., & Koh, C-K. (2002). Computer anxiety and attitudes toward computers among rural secondary school teachers : A Malaysian perspective. Journal of Research on Technology on Education, 35(1), 27-48.
[18]. Keller, C., & Cernerud, L. (2002). Students' perceptions of e-learning in university education. Journal of Educational Media, 27(1-2), 55-67.
[19]. Kennedy, P. (2002). Net gains? Adult learners and online learning in Hong Kong. In J. Cribbin & P. Kennedy (Eds.), Lifelong Learning in Action: Hong Kong Practitioners' Perspectives (pp. 379-394). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
[20]. Khan, B. (Ed.). (1997). Web-based instruction. Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Educational Technology Publications, Inc.
[21]. Khine, M. S. (2001). Attitudes toward computers among teacher education students in Brunei Darussalam. International Journal of Instructional Media, 28(2), 147-152.
[22]. Lindner, J. R., Murphy, T. H., & Dooley K.E. (2001). Factors affecting faculty adoption of distance education: competency, value and educational technology support. th Proceedings of the 20 Annual Western Region Agricultural Education Research Meeting, Carmel, California.
[23]. Litchfield, R. E., Oakland ,M. J., and Anderson, J.A. (2002). Relationship between intern characteristics, computer attitudes and use of online instruction in a dietetic training program. The American Journal of Distance Education ,16(1), 23-36.
[24]. McDonald, J., & Reushle, S. (2000). Engagement in Web-based Education: Designing for Models of Student Learning. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 9(3), 287-297.
[26]. Perdue, K. J., & Valentine, T. (2000). Deterrents to participation in Web-based continuing professional education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 7-26.
[27]. Perris, K., Zhang, W.Y., & Poon, T. (2004). An investigation of distance learners' preferences for and barriers to online learning in Hong Kong. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 13(2), 139-149.
[28]. Sanders, D. W., & Morrison-Shetlar, A. I. (2001). Student attitudes toward Web-enhanced instruction in an introductory Biology course. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(3), 251-262.
[29]. Simonson, M. (1997). Distance education: review of the literature. Washington, D.C: Association for Educational Communication and Technology (AECT).
[30]. Selwyn, N., Marriott, N., & Marriott, P. (2000). Net gains or net pains? Business students; use of the Internet. Higher Education Quarterly, 54(2), 166-186.
[31]. Siekmann, S. (1998). To integrate your language Web tools - call WebCT. Paper presented at the National Language Processing and Industrial Application, New Brunswick, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed422899).
[32]. Siew, P-F. (2003). Flexible on-line assessment and feedback for teaching linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(1), 43-51.
Tarbin, S., & Trevitt, C. (2001). Try, try again! In D. Murphy, R. Walker & G. Webb (Eds.), Online Learning and Teaching with Technology: Case studies, Experience and Practice (pp.63-72). London: Kogan Page.
[34]. Wernet, S. P., Olliges, R. H., & Delicath, T. A. (2000). Postcourse evaluation of WebCT (Web Course Tools) classes by social work students. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(4), 487-504.
[35]. White, C. (2000). Learn Online. Journal of Technological Horizons in Education, 27(9), 66-69.
[36]. Zacharis, Nick Z. (2010). The Impact of Learning Styles on Students a Achievement in a Web-Based versus an Equivalent Face-to-Face Course. College Student Journal, Sep 2010, Vol. 44, Issue 3.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.