The Effectiveness Of The Comprehension Hypothesis: A Review On The Current Research On Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition

R. Joseph Ponniah*
* Assistant Professor, National Institute of Technology, Trichirappalli, India.
Periodicity:April - June'2011
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.1.2.1452

Abstract

The Comprehension Hypothesis (CH) is the most powerful hypothesis in the field of Second Language Acquisition despite the presence of the rivals the skill-building hypothesis, the output hypothesis, and the interaction hypothesis. The competing hypotheses state that consciously learned linguistic knowledge is a necessary step for the development of second language competence whereas the CH posits that comprehensible input as the crucial ingredient of SLA. Moreover, conscious knowledge of second language can be used only to edit the output of the acquired language. The article further reviews some of the current research on vocabulary acquisition and the review confirms that incidental acquisition of vocabulary is more powerful than intentional learning.

Keywords

Comprehensible Input, Incidental Learning, Comprehension Check.

How to Cite this Article?

Ponniah, J. (2011). The Effectiveness Of The Comprehension Hypothesis: A Review On The Current Research On Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 1(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.1.2.1452

References

[1]. Carey, S. (1978). The child as word learner. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G.A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 264–293). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[2]. Day, R., Omura. C & Hiramatsu.M. (1991). Incidental EFL Vocabulary Learning and Reading. Reading in a Foreign Language. 7(2), 541-551.
[3]. Ellidokuzoglu (2008). BEYOND “Beyond the monitor model. The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 4(1) 6- 18.
[4]. Krashen, S. (2003). Explorations in Language Acquisition and Use. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
[5]. Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
[6]. Krashen. S. (2008). Anxiety is good for you. The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 4(1), 19.
[7]. Kweon, S., & Kim, H., (2008). Beyond raw frequency: Incidental vocabulary acquisition in extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20 (2), 191-215.
[8]. Lee, S.Y. and Hsu,Y. (2009). Determining the crucial characteristics of extensive reading programs: The impact of extensive reading on EFL writing. The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 5(1), 12-20.
[9]. Lehmann, M. (2007). Is intentional or incidental vocabulary learning more effective? The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(1), 23-28.
[10]. Mason, B., & Krashen, S. (2004). Is form-focused vocabulary instruction worth-while? RELC Journal, 35(2), 179-185.
[11]. Mason, B., & Krashen, S. (2010). The Reality, Robustness, and Possible Superiority of Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition: Another Look at File and Adams (2010). TESOL Quarterly. 44(4), 790-793.
[12]. McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of Second-Language Learning. dward Arnold, London
[13]. Ponniah, R. J. (2008). Free voluntary reading and the acquisition of grammar by adult ESL students. The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 4(1), 20-22.
[14]. Ponniah, R. J. (2009). The robustness of free reading in second and foreign language education. Language in India, 9 (12), 21-29.
[15]. Ponniah, R. J. (2011). Incidental acquisition of vocabulary by reading. The Reading Matrix. 11(2), 135-139
[16]. Ponniah, R. J. & Krashen. S. (2008). The expanded output hypothesis. The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 4(2), 2-3.
[17]. Sánchez and Schmitt (2010). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from an authentic novel: Do Things Fall Apart? . Reading in a Foreign Language. 22(1) 31-55.
[18]. Swain, M. (2005). The Output Hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 471-483.
[19]. Tekmen and Daloglu (2006). An investigation of incidental vocabulary acquisition in relation leaner proficiency level and word frequency. Foreign Language Annals 39(2) 220-243.
[20]. Wagovich and Newhoff (2004). The Single Exposure: Partial Word Knowledge Growth Through Reading. American Journal of Speech - Language Pathology. 13(4) 316-328
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Online 15 15

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.