t = 0.66 √fck for river sand mixes and ft = 0.82fck0.48 for crushed rock sand .

">

Use of Crushed Rock Sand as an Alternative to River Sand in Bacterial Concrete

C. Venkata Siva Rama Prasad*, T. V. S. Vara Lakshmi **
*Research Scholar,Department of Civil Engineering, University College of Engineering & Technology, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, India.
**Asst.Professor & Head,Department of Civil Engineering, University College of Engineering & Technology, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Periodicity:December - February'2019
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jce.9.1.14341

Abstract

Bacterial concrete has emerged as a corrective measure for treating cracks in structures such as bridges, RCC buildings, RCC pipes, channel linings, flooring, etc. it cracks and reduces its resistance and also has an impact on the reinforcement once it has come into contact with water, carbon dioxide and various chemicals. To repair cracks in concrete, regular maintenance and special treatment is required, which can be extremely costly. In this paper, Bacillus subtilis bacteria with calcite lactate are used as part of different percentages, such as 5%, 10% and 15% of cement weight for M20 grade concrete. The effect of crushed rock sand on the strength properties of bacterial concrete studied. SEM and X-Ray Diffraction examined on concrete. Bacteria produce CaCO3 precious stones which hinders the smaller scale cracks and pores in the concrete subsequent to responding with calcium lactate.Upto 10%bacterial solution,the concrete strength increses. An empirical relation between flexural strength and compressive strength is proposed in the formula of ft = 0.66 √fck for river sand mixes and ft = 0.82fck0.48 for crushed rock sand .

Keywords

Bacterial Concrete,Bacillus Subtili,Crushed rock sand,SEM,X-Ray Diffraction.

How to Cite this Article?

Prasad, C. V. S. R., & Lakshmi, T.V.S.V(2019). Use of Crushed Rock Sand as an Alternative to River Sand in Bacterial Concrete. i-manager’s Journal on Civil Engineering, 9(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.26634/jce.9.1.14341

References

[1]. ACI Committee 318. (2002). Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete and Commentary, ACI, MI.
[2]. Anbuvelan, K., & Subramanian, K. (2014). An empirical relationship between modulus of elasticity, modulus of rupture and compressive strength of m60 concrete containing Metakaolin. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 8(11), 1294-1298.
[3]. Bureau of Indian Standards. (1959). Indian standard code of practice-methods of test for strength of concrete. (IS 516-1959). New Delhi, India.
[4]. Bureau of Indian Standards. (1987). Specification for 53 grade Ordinary Portland cement. (IS 12269-1987). New Delhi, India.
[5]. Bureau of Indian Standards. (1996). Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement. (IS 4031-1996). New Delhi, India.
[6]. Bureau of Indian Standards. (1999). Splitting tensile strength of concrete - method of test. (IS 5816-1999). New Delhi, India.
[7]. Bureau of Indian Standards. (2009). Concrete mix proportioning-Guidelines. (IS 10262-2009). New Delhi, India.
[8]. Bureau of Indian Standards. (2009). Plain and reinforced concrete code of practice (fourth revision). (IS 456-2000). New Delhi, India.
[9]. CSS (Concrete structures standard). (2006). New Zealand. (NZS - 3101-2006).
[10]. EC- 02 Designers. Handbook to Euro-code 2 Part1.1 Design of Concrete Structures. Thomas Telford Services Ltd.,London.
[11]. Jonkers, H. M. (2011). Bacteria-based self-healing concrete. Heron, 56 (1/2).
[12]. Jonkers, H. M., & Schlangen, E. (2007, April). Crack repair by concrete-immobilized bacteria. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Self Healing Materials (pp. 18-20).
[13]. Jonkers, H. M., Thijssen, A., Muyzer, G., Copuroglu, O., & Schlangen, E. (2010). Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete. Ecological Engineering, 36(2), 230-235.
[14]. Joseph, C., Jefferson, A. D., & Cantoni, M. B. (2007, April). Issues relating to the autonomic healing of cementitious materials. In First International Conference on Self-healing Materials (pp. 1-8).
[15]. Kessler, M. R., Sottos, N. R., & White, S. R. (2003). Selfhealing structural composite materials. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 34(8), 743-753.
[16]. Li, V. C., & Herbert, E. (2012). Robust self-healing concrete for sustainable infrastructure. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 10(6), 207-218.
[17]. Ramakrishnan, V., Ramesh, K. P., & Bang, S. S. (2001, April). Bacterial concrete. In Smart Materials (Vol. 4234, pp. 168-177). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
[18]. Rao, S. K., Sravana, P., & Rao, T. C. (2016a). Experimental studies in Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity of roller compacted concrete pavement containing fly ash and M-sand. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 9(4), 289-301.
[19]. Rao, S. K., Sravana, P., & Rao, T. C. (2016b). Investigating the effect of M-sand on abrasion resistance of Fly Ash Roller Compacted Concrete (FRCC). Construction and Building Materials, 118, 352-363.
[20]. Rao, S. K., Sravana, P., & Rao, T. C. (2016c). Investigating the effect of M-sand on abrasion resistance of roller compacted concrete containing GGBS. Construction and Building Materials, 122, 191-201.
[21]. Reddy, S. V., Satya, A. K., Rao, S. M., & Azmatunnisa, M. (2012). A biological approach to enhance strength and durability in concrete structures. International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology, 4(2), 392-399.
[22]. Santhosh, K. R., Ramakrishnan, V., Duke, E. F., & Bang, S. S. (2000). SEM Investigation of Microbial Calcite Precipitation in Cement. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cement Microscopy (Vol. 22, pp. 293- 305). International Cement Microscopy Association.
[23]. Schlangen, H. E. J. G., Jonkers, H. M., Qian, S., & Garcia, A. (2010). Recent advances on self healing of concrete. In FraMCos-7: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures.
[24]. The Canadian code of practice (CSA). Design of Concrete Structures. CSA A 23.3:1994. Technical Committee, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ontario.
[25]. Wang, J., Van Tittelboom, K., De Belie, N., & Verstraete, W. (2012). Use of silica gel or polyurethane immobilized bacteria for self-healing concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 26(1), 532-540.
[26]. Yusuf, I. T., Jimoh, Y. A., & Salami, W. A. (2016). An appropriate relationship between flexural strength and compressive strength of palm kernel shell concrete. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55(2), 1553-1562.
[27]. Zwaag, S. (Ed.). (2008). Self Healing Materials: An Alternative Approach to 20 Centuries of Materials Science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science+ Business Media BV.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.