The Impact of Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Feedback on Students' Achievement in a Distance Learning Environment

Orit Zeichner*
Lecturer and Researcher, Kibbutzim College of Education Technology and Arts, Israel.
Periodicity:January - March'2018
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.14.4.13976

Abstract

This paper deals with the field of "feedback intervention" in a distance learning environment. The study examines the influences of two types of feedback: cognitive content-oriented feedback designed to meet the student's cognitive needs relating to the curriculum, and non-cognitive feedback that refers to motivational–affective aspects of the learning process, in the form of axioms relating to the student's ability, on one hand, and the effort that the student puts into the learning process, on the other. The purpose of this study was to examine the differential effect of different types of feedback on the student's coping variables (cognitive assessment), i.e. the sense of threat and challenge, self-efficacy, and achievement. The rationale for choosing feedback axioms for motivation is based on recent theoretical models which focus on students' perceptions and beliefs as elements that affect their learning motivation. The study was conducted on 171 subjects divided into three study groups. Each group received a different type of feedback: content feedback, effort feedback, or ability feedback. The findings indicate that groups which received feedback relating to more than content show improved motivation, an increased sense of challenge and improved achievement in comparison to the group which received content feedback only. Small differences were found between the ability feedback and effort feedback groups.

Keywords

Ability Feedback, Effort Feedback, Motivation, Self-Efficacy

How to Cite this Article?

Zeichner, O. (2018). The Impact of Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Feedback on Students' Achievement in a Distance Learning Environment. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology,14(4), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.14.4.13976

References

[1]. American Psychological Association. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles. Washington, DC: Author.
[2]. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
[3]. Ames, D. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2015). Perceived intent motivates people to magnify observed harms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(12), 3599-3605.
[4]. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[5]. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
[6]. Barberà, E., Layne, L., & Gunawardena, C. N. (2014). Designing online interaction to address disciplinary competencies: A cross-country comparison of faculty perspectives. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 142-169.
[7]. Bernath, U., Szücs, A., Tait, A., & Vidal, M.,(Eds.). (2013). Distance and E-learning in Transition: Learning Innovation, Technology and Social Challenges. John Wiley & Sons.
[8]. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and Schools. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[9]. Brown, M., Kulik, C. T., & Lim, V. (2016). Managerial tactics for communicating negative performance feedback. Personnel Review, 45(5), 969-987.
[10]. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and Selfregulation Learning: A Theortical Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
[11]. Butler, R. (1995). Motivational and informational functions and consequences of children's attention to peers' work. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 347-360.
[12]. Butler, R. (2000). Making judgments about ability: The role of implicit theory of ability in moderating inferences from temporal and social comparison information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 965- 978.
[13]. Chaiprasurt, C., & Esichaikul, V. (2013). Enhancing motivation in online courses with mobile communication tool support: A comparative study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 377- 401.
[14]. Ching, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. C. (2016). Learners' Interpersonal Beliefs and Generated Feedback in an Online Role-Playing Peer-Feedback Activity: An Exploratory Study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 106-122.
[15]. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. John Wiley & Sons.
[16]. Conrad, D. (2013). Pondering change and the relationship of prior learning assessment to MOOCs and Knowledge in Higher Education. PLA Inside Out: An International Journal on Theory, Research and Practice in Prior Learning Assessment, 2(1).
[17]. Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314-325.
[18]. Dempsey, J. V., Driscoll, M. P., & Swinddell, L. K. (1993). Text-based feedback. In J. V. Dempsey & G. C. Sales (Eds.), Interactive Instruction and Feedback (pp. 21- 54). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
[19]. DeNisi, A. S. (2015). Some further thoughts on the entrepreneurial personality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(5), 997-1003.
[20]. Dinning, T. M., Maghill, C. A., Money, J., Walsh, B., & Nixon, S. (2016). Can a blended learning approach enhance students transition into higher education? A study to explore perception, engagement and progression. International Journal of Advancement in Education and Social Science, 3(2), 1-7.
[21]. Duchaine, E. L., Jolivette, K., & Fredrick, L. D. (2011). The effect of teacher coaching with performance feedback on behavior-specific praise in inclusion classrooms. Education and Treatment of Children, 34(2), 209-227.
[22]. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset. New York: Random House
[23]. Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets and human nature: Promoting change in the Middle East, the schoolyard, the racial divide, and willpower. American Psychologist, 67(8), 614-622.
[24]. Garrison, D. R. (2012). Article review - Social presence within the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 250-253.
[25]. Gunawardena, C. N. (2013). Culture and online distance learning. In M.G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education, 3rd edition (pp. 185-200). New York: Routledge
[26]. Gunawardena, C. N. (2015). Building Online Learning Communities: Design Principles and Strategies. International Conference on the Humanities 2015: New Dynamics, Directions and Divergences (ICH 2015). University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.
[27]. Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2002). Students' distress with a web-based distance education course: An ethnographic study of participants' experiences. In W. H. Dutton & B. D. Loader (Eds.), Digital Academe: The New Media and Institutions of Higher Education and Learning (pp. 62-84). London: Routledge.
[28]. Hilton, J, L., Gaudet, D., Clark, P., Robinson, J., & Wiley, D. (2013). The adoption of open educational resources by one community college math department. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(4), 37–50.
[29]. Huges, E. M., Witzel, B. S., Riccomini, P. J., Fries, K. M., & Kanyongo, G. Y. (2014). A Meta-Analysis of Algebra Interventions for Learners with Disabilities and Struggling Learners. Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 15(1), 36-47.
[30]. Keller, J. M., & Kopp, T. W. (1987). An application of the ARCS Model of Motivational Design. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Theories in Action: Lessons Illustrating Selected Theories and Models (pp. 289-320). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[31]. King, P. E. (2016). When do students benefit from performance feedback? A test of feedback intervention theory in speaking improvement. Communication Quarterly, 64(1), 1-15.
[32]. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: Historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254- 284.
[33]. Kramarski, B., & Zeichner, O. (2001). Using technology to enhance mathematical reasoning: Effects of feedback and self-regulation learning. Education Media International, 38(2-3), 77-82.
[34]. Lazarus, R. S. (2000). Toward better research on coping. American Psychologist, 55(6), 665-673.
[35]. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer.
[36]. Linnenbrink, E. A. (2006). Emotion research in education: Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the integration of affect, motivation, and cognition. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 307- 314.
[37]. Llorens, A. C., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Cerdán, R. (2016). Formative feedback to transfer self-regulation of taskoriented reading strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(4), 314-331.
[38]. Maier, U., Wolf, N., & Randler, C. (2016). Effects of a computer-assisted formative assessment intervention based on multiple-tier diagnostic items and different feedback types. Computers & Education, 95, 85-98.
[39]. Moore, M. G. (Ed.) (2013). Handbook of Distance Education. Routledge.
[40]. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Technology and media (chapter 5). In Distance Education: A systems view of on-line learning, 3rd edition (pp. 72-96). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
[41]. Mory, E. H. (1996). Feedback research. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (Chap. 32, pp. 919- 955). New York: Simon & Schuster MacMillan.
[42]. Mory, E. H. (2004). Feedback Research Revisited. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 745- 783). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[43]. Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2015). Revisiting teacher preparation: Responding to Technology Transience in the Educational Setting. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(2), 93-105.
[44]. Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L.(2016). In the eye of the Beholder. Digital Badges in Education: Trends, Issues, and Cases, 102.
[45]. Muis, K. R., Ranellucci, J., Trevors, G., & Duffy, M. C. (2015). The effects of technology-mediated immediate feedback on kindergarten students' attitudes, emotions, engagement and learning outcomes during literacy skills development. Learning and Instruction, 38, 1-13.
[46]. Offir, B., Barth, I., Lev, Y., & Shteinbok, A. (2003). Teacher-student interactions and learning outcomes in distance learning. Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 65-75.
[47]. Offir, B., Lev, Y., Lev, Y., Barth, I., & Shteinbok, A. (2004). An integrated analysis of verbal and nonverbal interaction in conventional and distance learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(2), 101-118.
[48]. Oliver, R., & McLoughlin, C. (2000). Using Networking Tools to Support Online Learning. In F. Lockwood, & A. Gooley (Eds.), Innovation in Open and Distance Learning (pp. 149-162). Kogan Page, London
[49]. Ozaki, C. C. (2016). College Impact Theories Past and Present. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2016(174), 23-33
[50]. Park, O. (1996). Adaptive instructional systems. In D. J. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp 634-664). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.
[51]. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544-555.
[52]. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Duncan, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A Manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Technical Report 91-B-004, Regents of the University of Michigan.
[53]. Poulos, A. & Mahony, M. J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students' perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143-154.
[54]. Richardson, J. C., Besser, E., Koehler, A., Lim, J., & Strait, M. (2016). Instructors' Perceptions of Instructor Presence in Online Learning Environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4), 83-104.
[55]. Sadykova, G. (2014). Mediating knowledge through peer-to-peer interaction in a multicultural online learning environment: A case of international students in the US. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3), 25-49.
[56]. Schank, R. C. (2002). Designing world class elearning: How IBM, GE, Harvard Business School, and Columbia University are succeeding at e-learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[57]. Schrum, L. (2015). Distance Learning: Where have we been & where are we going? Nova Southeastern University.
[58]. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. R. (2012). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications. Pearson Higher Education.
[59]. Sorensen, C. (2015). An Examination of the Relationship between Online Class Size and Instructor Performance. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 140- 159.
[60]. Twigg, C. A. (2015). Improving Learning and Reducing Costs: Fifteen years of Course Description. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47(6), 6-13.
[61]. White, J. A., Troutman, A. P., & Stone, D. E. (1993). Effects of three levels of cognitive feedback and twocognitive levels of tasks on performance in computerdirected mathematics instruction. Journal of Computer- Based Instruction, 18(4), 130-134.
[62]. Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302-314.
[63]. Zirkin, B. G., & Sumler, D. E. (2008). Interactive or Noninteractive? That is the Question!!! International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 10(1), 95-112.

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article
Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.