i-manager Publications

Comparison between HS and TLBO to Optimize PIA Speed Controller and Current Controller for Switched Reluctance Motor

Ahmed M.Hussien*, Mahmoud Abdallah Attia**

* Preventive Maintenance Engineer, HeeSung Electronics, Egypt.

** Faculty of Engineering, Department of Electrical Power and Machines, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Periodicity:December - February'2017
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jcir.5.1.13542

Abstract

The target of this work is to make optimize the gains in Proportional Integral (PI) and Proportional Integral Acceleration (PIA) controllers for Switched Reluctance Motor (SRM) drive system by using two different optimization methods. The methods are Harmonic Search (HS) and Teaching-Learning Based Optimization (TLBO). The Model of SRM can be easily represented with its controllers in Matlab/Simulink which gives the advantage to show the performance simulation of the machine illustrated by figures and also the effect of the load on the motor. As mentioned before, two controllers are used here. First one is the classical Proportional Integral controller (PI). The PI is the common and simple method used for controlling the feedback signal and it is used in the SRM drive system to control both speed and current. The second controller is Proportional Integral Acceleration controller (PIA). The PIA controllers have a good performance with the third order applications. The results prove the superiority of PIA than the classical controller. Results determine that the TLBO optimization method get better results than the HS method. Finally, comparison with previous work is carried out to verify the efficiency of presented methods. The comparison is applied at several loading conditions and the presented work proves its superiority and efficiently under all loading conditions studied.

Keywords

Optimization, HS, TLBO, PI Controller, PIA Controller, SRM

How to Cite this Article?

Hussien, A. M., and Attia, M. A. (2017). Comparison between HS and TLBO to Optimize PIA Speed Controller and Current Controller for Switched Reluctance Motor. i-manager’s Journal on Circuits and Systems, 5(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.26634/jcir.5.1.13542

References

[1]. Abbasian, S. (2013). Simulation and Testing of a Switched Reluctance Motor by Matlab/Simulink and dSPACE. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.

[2]. Åström, K. J. (2002). Control system design. Lecture Notes for ME 155A, Department of Mechanical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, 333.

[3]. Chong, E. K., & Zak, S. H. (2004). An Introduction to Optimization. John Wiley & Sons.

[4]. Diaa, I. M. et al. (2016). Harmony Search Algorithm and Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization Approaches to Enhance Power System Performance. World Applied Sciences Journal, 34(10), 1357-1365.

[5]. DiRenzo, M. T. (2000). Switched reluctance motor control–basic operation and example using the TMS320F240. Texas Instruments, Digital Signal Processing Solutions, in SPRA420A-February.

[6]. Geem, Z. W., Kim, J. H., & Loganathan, G. V. (2001). A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony search. Simulation, 76(2), 60-68.

[7]. Krishnan, R. (2001). Switched reluctance motor drives: Modeling, simulation, analysis, design, and applications. CRC Press.

[8]. Lakshmi, P. P., & Ravisrinivas, L. (2012). Modeling and Simulation of Switched Reluctance Motor Double Closed Loop Control System. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 1(8), 546-562.

[9]. Miller, T. J. E. (Ed.). (2001). Electronic control of switched reluctance machines. Power Engineering Series, Elsevier Ltd.

[10]. Puangdownreong, D. (2012). Application of current search to optimum PIDA controller design. Intelligent Control and Automation, 3(4), 303.

[11]. Rao, R. V., Savsani, V. J., & Vakharia, D. P. (2011). Teaching–learning-based optimization: A novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems. Computer-Aided Design, 43(3), 303-315.

[12]. Sasmal, M., & Mula, D. (2015). Simulation of Speed Controlled Switched Reluctance Motor Drive System using MATLAB Simulink. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, 3(3).

[13]. Wang, H. (2014). ECE 900 Simulation of Switched Reluctance Motor and Control Based on MATLAB Environment (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Alberta).

[14]. Weise, T. (2009). Global Optimization Algorithms- Theory and Application. University of Kassel, Distributed Systems Group, Second Edition.

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25

Comparison between HS and TLBO to Optimize PIA Speed Controller and Current Controller for Switched Reluctance Motor

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content: