Extensive and Classified Literature Review on Facts Device: TCSC

Niharika Agrawal *  Mamatha Mahesh Gowda **
*-** Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, SJB Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Abstract

The demand for electric power is rising due to industrialization and urbanized life style. Existing generation and transmission facilities are not capable to fulfil this demand. Power transmission lines are pushed to operate close to their thermal and stability limits. This compromises the system security. Building new lines is difficult due to environmental, economic and political reasons. Here FACTS devices provide the opportunity to improve the power flows and voltages thereby enhancing the system security. FACTS devices improve Available Transfer Capability (ATC). This paper focuses on Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitor (TCSC) FACTS device. TCSC changes the electrical length of existing line and transmits large amounts of power when needed. It is a combination of TCR in parallel with capacitor. TCR is a variable inductor which is controlled by firing angle. This paper focuses on extensive literature review on the work done on TCSC device based on different criteria.

Keywords :

Introduction

There is rapid growth in the demand of electrical power due to increase in the industrial and domestic load. Power demand is greater than the power generation. The solution is installation of new power stations and construction of more transmission lines. This may not be practicable or desirable due to many reasons like heavy cost, large time consumption and environment issues. Adjusting the reactance parameter of the transmission line improve the power flow profile of the power system. There is huge competition in the electricity market and this give scope to increase the capacity of power transmission of existing facilities.

In this situation the role of FACTS devices plays a vital role. The concept of FACTS devices has been given by N.G. Hingorani, in 1988. FACTS devices allow increased utilization of existing transmission network close to its thermal limits. It also avoids the need to construct new transmission lines and improves stability. FACTS devices use power electronics components and switches which are fast acting, more flexible to control the power flow in the transmission lines.

These devices can improve both dynamic and static performance of the system and have many advantages like enhancement of transmission capacity, mitigation of sub synchronous resonance, damping of power oscillation, power flow control, reducing the losses, increase in load ability, limiting short circuit currents, reducing unsymmetrical components, improvement in transient stability, voltage stability while enhancing system security.

1. Basic Principle of TCSC

TCSC is a series-controlled capacitance reactance that provide continuous power control on the AC line over a wide range. TCSC controllers use series compensating capacitor shunted by TCR. TCR is controlled by firing angle and thus it provides variable inductance and acts as variable inductive reactor.

The variation of XL with respect to can be given as:

(1)

When α varies from 0 to 90, XL (α) varies from actual reactance (XL) to infinity. This variable inductive tuned reactor at firing angle is connected in parallel with the series capacitor, so that the variable capacitive reactance is obtained. This modifies the transmission line impedance. Effective TCSC reactance is given by:

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)

TCSC has three different operating regions, viz., inductive, resonance and capacitive, which are based on the reactance provided by the TCSC. The TCSC characteristic curve of reactance is plotted between firing angle and reactance. It shows the operation in both capacitive and inductive regions. In between the two regions there is a resonance region.

A practical TCSC module consists of metal oxide varistor (MOV), for preventing the high capacitor voltages and also for transient stability series capacitor. Circuit breaker to control the insertion of capacitor is in the line. The role of current limiting inductor is restricting the magnitude and frequency of the capacitor current during the capacitor bypass operation. An ultra-high-speed contact (UHSC) across the TCSC valve is used to minimize the conduction losses. (Hingorani & Gyugyi, 2000; Kundur, 1994; Padiyar, 2007; Ramanujam, 2009; Sankar et al., 2010).

2. Literature Review

2.1 Based on Various FACTS Devices

This classification is based on the simulation and comparison of results using various FACTS devices. Simulink model for uncompensated power system has been developed and then simulated using various different FACTS controllers has been done. Simulation results showing real power and reactive power variation with change in the value of TCSC capacitance were plotted. The major devices from the FACTS family discussed were STATCOM, TCSC, FC-TCR, UPFC, SSSC. The performance evaluation of FACTS controllers for short transmission line has been done. TCSC Open loop control mode has been used for power flow control of transmission line. It has been done by firing angle variation and MATLAB based simulation. The aim of the simulation has been to understand the modeling and studying its influence on the electrical network. Active and reactive power flow, load current, load voltage variation has been observed and plotted. The variation of power flow with the change in value of capacitance were plotted. On increasing the value of capacitance there has been an improvement in real and reactive power flow. It has been concluded that FACTS devices controlled the power flow in a very fast and efficient manner, improved the voltage stability, power quality as compared to the uncompensated system (Akter et al., 2012; Archana & Basha, 2013; Chatterjee et al., 2014; Chavan & Lodhi, 2016; Joshi & Sahay, 2017; Khan et al., 2016; Kumar & Gupta, 2015; Mehta & Prakash, 2018; Mohmedhusein et al., 2017; Murali et al., 2010; Patel et al., 2017; Rakhonde et al., 2018; Saha et al., 2012).

Figure 1. TCSC Module

Different authors worked on various FACTS devices for controlling the power flow transmission in the transmission lines. The comparison of results on uncompensated case and compensation with different devices has been done. Here different firing control circuits were not developed. The response of TCSC to different operating modes and using TCSC power flow decreases in inductive mode and increases in capacitive mode.

2.2 Based on Single Phase Representation of TCSC using Pulse Generator Pulse generator

has been used for giving the firing pulses for analyzing the thyristor, capacitor current, capacitor voltage. For proper working of TCSC in capacitive and inductive mode appropriate pulses should be given. The modeling, simulation and analysis of the TCSC has been done. It has been found that the height of the load angle curve increases with more capacitive reactance of TCSC and decreases with more inductive reactance. Using TCSC, different operating regions were analyzed and plotted on the reactance characteristic diagram by firing angle variation of thyristor. Matlab, Labview and Model Sim were used to analyze the impedance characteristic as well as the transient stability of the system. There is a methodology to control the TCSC in inductive and capacitive region. Active and reactive power, the response of capacitor voltage, TCR currents and capacitor currents for different firing angles were studied. Using TCSC it has been observed that there is a smooth power flow control in transmission line over a wide range. TCSC can be used to increase the power transfer capacity of transmission line by changing the impedance of line. Device has been implemented in 3-phase 400 kV Kalpakam-Khammam line power flow profile analysis. The load has been suddenly increased and results were analyzed for both cases without and with TCSC controllers. Load condition has also been varied. Harmonic analysis, voltage sag and swell analysis has been done. It has been observed that using TCSC there is voltage stability improvement, power flow regulation and minimization of losses, power transfer capability has been enhanced closer to thermal limit without affecting the stability. The constant power control circuit developed has been tuned to for power flow improvement. The load voltage is maintained within limits under varying load conditions and sudden increase in load. TCSC is used for damping power oscillations with various input signals. (Arora et al., 2013a, 2013b; Chatterjee & Mitra, 2015; Choudhary, 2013; Dhawale & Gowda, 2017; Hitendrasinh & Makwana, 2015; Kanwar & Saxena, 2015; Khimsuriya & Solanki, 2016; Kumar & Shrivastava, 2016; Manjusha et al., 2016; Patel et al., 2016a; Prabhakar & Prabhu, 2016; Prudhviraj et al., 2013; Ram et al., 2015; Rathore & Singh, 2016; Sahu et al., 2014; Sangeetha & Padma, 2014; Sangeetha et al., 2015; Singh et al., 2013; Sivasankar & Sirish, 2017; Tiwari & Shukla, 2012).

Here the Simulink has been developed using pulse generator. Active and reactive power for different firing angles were measured. The different operating modes of TCSC, closed loop and open loop system were discussed. Here, the three-phase representation of TCSC, different ways of firing the circuit, fault analysis were not discussed.

2.3 Based on Three Phase Representation of TCSC using SIMULINK for Power Flow and Voltage Profile Improvement

For the proper working of TCSC, the values of TCSC capacitor and inductor should be chosen correctly. Capacitor value is affected by the degree of series compensation. The inductor value is affected by the range of capacitive and inductive region. There is a resonance region between the inductive and capacitive region. Resonance should be avoided as it produces harmonics in the system. It causes high voltage drop across TCR. The operating range of TCSC is lessened by multiple resonant points. To avoid this problem, the resonant factor which is defined as the ratio of resonant frequency of TCSC to power system frequency should be properly selected. When this factor is 1, it meets the condition of resonance and when less than 1 there is the occurrence of only capacitive region. So resonant factor 1 is not permitted and should be less than 3.

For the generation of appropriate conduction angle firing pulses SR flip flop has been used. Ramp signal has been generated by detecting the zero crossing of line current and it has been compared with the firing angle. To reduce the voltage sag using TCSC, PWM Generator Pulse Controller has been developed. The programmable voltage source has been used to vary the voltage with time. Testing with TCSC connected at different locations which comprised testing at sending end, testing at middle end and testing at receiving end of the transmission line, with different lengths of line, i.e.,100 km, 200 km, 300 km, 400 km long has been done. The power transfer capacity has been found to be better at the sending end as compared to other ends.

Power angle and P-V curves were used to assess the stability of the system which showed that there has been an improvement in both synchronous and voltage stability margins using TCSC. The receiving end voltage has been found constant under varying load conditions. Automatic control for TCSC has been done by a fuzzy controller. The controller also maintained the desired power flow in the transmission system.

Results showed that in the inductive mode the TCSC acts as a variable inductance providing device and thus acts as a controlled inductor. Overall inductance of the transmission line has been increased. Power flow decrease in inductive mode. The maximum reactance limit is selected properly to prevent the TCSC from operating in resonant region. It acts as variable capacitance providing device in the capacitive mode of operation. It decreased the reactance of transmission line depending on the firing angle. The power flow is increased in this mode. The efficiency and voltage regulation of the transmission line has been improved on using TCSC (Ankit et al., 2017; Chadar, 2013; Chirantan et al., 2017; German-Sobek et al., 2011; Karthikeyan & Eligo, 2019; Khattak & Khan, 2016; Mittal et al., 2011; Patel & Bhatt, 2012; Patel & Brahmbhatt, 2016; Patel et al., 2016b; Rao et al., 2013; Raut & Reddy, 2017; Raza et al., 2019; Shoiab et al., 2017; Singh et al., 2017; Sonam & Garg, 2016; Soreshjani et al., 2014; Suguna et al., 2016; Vashisth & Jamnani, 2016; Yadav & Dixit, 2017). Here detailed Simulink model has been developed for the three-phase representation of TCSC. It has been also shown that the parameters of TCSC should be properly selected. Here, the multi-bus systems, like IEEE-5 bus or IEEE-14 bus etc., were not analyzed.

2.4 Based on Simulation in Multi Bus System

FACTS controllers are widely used for congestion management in deregulated electricity market, to relieve transmission line overloading, and power flow enhancement. This has been analyzed by 5-bus system using MATLAB. Loss sensitivity index method has been used for the device placement. The simulation has also been carried on IEEE- 14 bus system with and without TCSC. After incorporating the TCSC device, the active and reactive power flow, transient stability has been improved. PSCAD software has been also used to investigate the performance of a double circuit line. Using TCSC the power transfer capability has been increased in the line. There has been an improvement of voltage stability and power flow control. TCSC based on PI, PID, FOPID and fuzzy controller has been designed and modeled. The controller has been tested on IEEE 9 Bus system with Matlab/Simulink software. The transient stability of the system has been improved by using local fuzzy based damping controller using Matlab/ Simulink program. Nine bus system with closed loop TCSC and FOPID controller and fuzzy controller has been discussed. Fuzzy controller has been proved to be more effective. The PID controller has been used to control the UPFC and TCSC performance in 30 bus system, IEEE 14 bus system using Matlab/Simulink platform. The TCSC device should be located at the optimum locations to have a better power flow transmission improvement. With the help of modeling and simulation of 14 bus system in Matlab voltage sag which has been created at the receiving end has been compensated using TCSC (Ashokkumar et al., 2013; Dafde & Bobade, 2017; Del Rosso et al., 2003; Dixit & Jhapte, 2013; Janhavi & Ratnakar, 2015; Kalaimani & Sundaram, 2017; Li et al., 2000; Marlin et al., 2015; Rani et al., 2015a, 2015b; Reddy & Ram, 2010; Selvarasu & Rajan, 2012; Shankar et al., 2015; Singh & Bhatt, 2018; Singh & Bharti, 2017; Srinivas & Krishna, 2016; Titus et al., 2013).

Here issues like the behavior of the system in a multimachine system for a very short period using FACTS device and without FACTS devices were discussed. The coordinated control by TCSC and PSS, the behavior of the system with different fault locations and fault clearing time were not discussed. Attention has not been given to real time simulation approach.

2.5 Based on Transient Stability Enhancement with Three Phase Faults after using TCSC

Analysis on three phase faults has been done without and with TCSC. With this three phase fault, problems occurs in generator voltage and current, infinite bus current and voltage and generator load angle. But after using TCSC transient stability enhancement, power flow improvement, enhancement of voltage stability and rotor angle improvement has been observed. Variation in load has been done from 5000 MW. It has been done till the system becomes unstable. Without the TCSC the system MW. It has been found unstable at 6000 MW, but after TCSC the system voltage stability gets enhanced and the rotor angle values also increased linearly.

The simulation of IEEE 3 machine 9 bus system has been done using SVC, SSSC and TCSC and the results were compared. Simulation results were developed for speed, rotor angle for synchronous machines of the system. It has been found that TCSC controlled the active and reactive power flow much better than SVC. The power curve showed oscillations when faults were applied which after applying TCSC were damped earlier without controller in the system. For real time simulation design, testing and analysis of STATCOM and TCSC has been done. Their relative performance has been studied using Matlab simulation. The results of the simulation were validated with OPAL-RT real time simulator which provide adequate and comprehensive modeling of electric power systems (EPS) containing FACTS. It has been observed that the settling time of relative load angles decreases in a much greater proportion while implementing TCSC as compared to STATCOM (Bainsla & Gupta, 2016; Desai et al., 2015; Garg et al., 2017a, 2017b; Kaur, 2016; Keerthivasan et al., 2005, 2014; Khan et al., 2016; Koundal & Shimi, 2019; Kumar & Surjan, 2013; Mahajan, 2008; Obi et al., 2016; Patel et al., 2002, 2006; Prakash & Tripathi, 2016; Rahman et al., 2021; Raju & Shubhanga, 2014, 2015, 2016; Saini et al., 2013; Salkuti, 2018; Sharma & Hooda, 2012; Shingare, 2015; Thampatty & Lakshmi, 2016).

Here the behavior of the system with the application of faults has been analyzed in detail while hardware issues and detailed mathematical analysis of the circuit has not been discussed.

2.6 Based on Hardware

A laboratory model has been created based on Arduino Uno for testing and implementation of single phase TCSC. The implementation of PLL has been done using Real-Time Application Interface (RTAI) on Linux platform. The variation of capacitance and inductance on the reactance characteristic graph were plotted. A system has been developed for a 2-bus system consisting of injection transformer, ZCD circuit, TCSC circuit having an inductor and capacitor and TRIAC for triggering. There has been improved power flow control, improvement in efficiency and voltage regulation of transmission line with TCSC.

Single machine infinite bus connection has been done through TCSC compensated lossless transmission line. The controller which gave the firing pulses for the TCSC thyristor to turn on has been Arduino ATmega controller. Oscillations were created and the controller has been tested for damping these oscillations. There has been an improvement in stability and oscillations were damped. Techniques like genetic algorithm optimization, ant colony optimization, honey bee algorithm firefly algorithm, particle swarm optimization and other AI based techniques can be used for developing the control algorithm for TCSC.

There are different models of transmission line. The Pi model of transmission line has been developed with lumped parameters. The length of line has been 136 km. It has been simulated in MATLAB with series capacitor and induction motor as load and firing circuit using Arduino controller. There has been a power flow enhancement, improvement in receiving end voltage, active power using TCSC.

Microcontroller 89S52 has been used to develop the closed loop control for TCSC. The different hardware components required were micro-controller 89S52, Microprocessor ADC 0808, Decade counter, LCD 16LC, Optocoupler, Voltage Regulator. The system needed two step-down transformers, one for providing power to microcontroller unit and another for measurement of output voltage. Input and output voltage has been compared using ADC. The triggering pulses to the thyristor were given using Arduino. The Simulink model consisted of ACS 712 (current transducer), OP AMP used for zero cross detection of line current (Arunachalam et al., 2005; Fuerte-Esquivel et al., 2000; Juncheng et al., 2002; Lal et al., 2008; Patel et al., 2016c; Pedekar, 2016; Sridevi, 2014; Tan et al., 1998; Xueqiang & Chen, 1999; Yarlagadda et al., 2012; Zaid, 2011).

Here different hardware set up were used for the power flowcontrol. The circuits were based on Linux, Arduino, PLL, etc. The detailed mathematical analysis, synchronisation techniques and the validity of the mathematical analysis has not been done by EMTP digital simulations.

2.7 Based on TCSC Circuit Analysis, Mathematical and Analytical Modeling and Synchronization Techniques

There are different reference on signals for thyristor firing angles namely line current or capacitor voltage. They have different impact on TCSC dynamic response. When the capacitor voltage has been used as the reference signal there were overshoot and oscillations but when line current has been used there have been no overshoot. Firing control method based on two stages has been developed for smooth switching between the capacitive vernier and inductive vernier modes and it has been done in less than a cycle. Detailed circuit analysis of TCSC using Laplace transformation equations for TCSC for any time period were precisely developed. The mathematical relationship between the fundamental impedance of TCSC and thyristor firing angle has been derived using Fourier analysis and it has been verified using EMTP digital simulations. A mathematical model has been developed which described the characteristics of TCSC.

The fundamental impedance has been calculated and characteristic of a TCSC using a normalized model has been established. The steady state equations of TCSC were given in normalized form which has been useful for design purposes. The finite quality factor Q has been incorporated in the equations and the use of Fourier analysis has been done. Earlier the device has been modeled using Poincare map. Poincare map linearization is used to calculate the passive damping of TCSC. In these approaches the inputs are assumed constant for one half cycle. This limited the effective bandwidth to a range that is adequate for SSR studies. An analytical, linear state space model of TCSC has been developed and the results were verified. The TCSC model is divided into linear and non-linear parts and then the non-linear model has been simulated in frequency domain. A good response and robustness to AC parameters were seen after using the controller (Bruno et al., 2015; Ghosh et al., 2001; Hu et al., 2004; Jindal et al., 2002; Jovcic & Pillai, 2005; Khederzadeh, 2007; Rigby et al., 1999; Rigby, 2002; Yang et al., 2017).

Conclusion

In the present paper extensive literature review has been done for the TCSC FACTS device. FACTS devices increases reliability, provides more flexibility, controllability and stability of power system. TCSC improves power system dynamic performance, boost power transfer capability of the transmission system, enhances the system transient stability, load sharing between parallel lines, improves dynamic stability, minimize system losses, mitigate subsynchronous resonance, damp power swings. This TCSC device is the most efficient and effective device in the modern FACTS power device used in transmission networks. The net var rating of series type of compensator is only 7.2% of that required for a shunt type for achieving the same power transfer. TCSC is based on state-of-the-art highpower electronics. It helps to mitigate transmission line capability constraints by controlling the line impedance and there by offering a better solution from technical, economic and environmental points of view.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to express sincere thanks to Principal and Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, SJB Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. for providing extended support to carry out this work.

References

[1]. Akter, S., Saha, A., & Das, P. (2012). Modeling, simulation and comparison of various FACTS devices in power system. International Journal of Engineering & Technology (IJERT), 1(8).
[2]. Ankit, P., Mahavir, C., Viral, K., Vedant, R., & Patel, S. (2017). Effect of TCSC in transmission line. International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development, 2348-4470.
[3]. Archana,G., & Basha, S. (2013). Performance analysis and comparison of various FACTS devices in power system, International Journal of Engineering and Science, 3(12), 104-119.
[4]. Arora, K., Agarwal, S. K., Kumar, N., & Vir, D. (2013a). Analysis of power flow control in power system model using TCSC. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 3(3), 821–826.
[5]. Arora, K., Agarwal, S. K., Kumar, N., & Vir, D. (2013b). Simulation aspect of thyristor controlled series compensator in power system. IOSR Journal of Engineering, 3(4), 17-26.
[6]. Arunachalam, M., Lal, G., Rajiv, C. G., & Narayanan, M. M. B. (2005). Performance verification of TCSC control th and protection equipment using RTDS. In 15 Power Systems Computation Conference (pp. 22-26).
[7]. Ashokkumar, N., Rathinakumar, M., Yogesh, M., & Dinesh, J. (2013). Comparative study on the effectiveness of TCSC and UPFC facts controllers. International Journal of Computer Applications, 67(5), 10-16.
[8]. Bainsla, U., & Gupta, A. (2016). Comparison of SVC and TCSC for transient stability enhancement of multi-machine system. International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, 5(9), 7344-7352.
[9]. Bruno, S., De Carne, G., & La Scala, M. (2015). Transmission grid control through TCSC dynamic series compensation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31(4), 3202-3211.
[10]. Chadar, M. (2013). Analysis and modeling of thyristor controlled series capacitor for the reduction of voltage sag. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Science Technology and Engineering, 2(8), 43-47.
[11]. Chatterjee, D., & Mitra, A. (2015). Simulink based three phase closed loop power flow control using TCSC. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 3(4), 2644-2651.
[12]. Chatterjee, D., Mitra, A., & Sarkar, S. (2014, March). A conceptual study for control strategy of TCSC in inductive and capacitive region. In 2014, International Conference on Circuits, Power and Computing Technologies [ICCPCT- 2014] (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[13]. Chavan, R., & Lodhi, R. S. (2016). Selection of FACTs devices for better reactive power compensation through capacitor. International Journal of Engineering and Techniques, 2(5), 28-35.
[14]. Chirantan, S., Jena, R., Swain, S. C., & Panda, P. C. (2017, October). Comparative analysis of STATCOM and TCSC FACTS controller for power profile enhancement in a nd long transmission line. In 2017, 2 International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES) (pp. 407-413). IEEE.
[15]. Choudhary, D. (2013). Enhancement of power system voltage stability using SVC and SSSC. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 4(1), 1-6.
[16]. Dafde, R. A., & Bobade, C. M. (2017). Improvement of voltage stability and power flow control in power system network using TCSC. Journal of Network Communications and Emerging Technologies, 7(6), 61-65.
[17]. Del Rosso, A. D., Canizares, C. A., & Dona, V. M. (2003). A study of TCSC controller design for power system stability improvement. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 18(4), 1487-1496.
[18]. Desai, V., Pandya, V., & Markana, A. (2015). Enhancement of transient stability of power system with variable series compensation. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 62-68.
[19]. Dhawale, P. G., & Gowda, D. (2017, September). Design and implementation of TCSC for power flow enhancement. In 2017, International Conference on Current Trends in Computer, Electrical, Electronics and Communication (CTCEEC) (pp. 675-678). IEEE.
[20]. Dixit, S., & Jhapte, R. (2013). Optimization location of TCSC to control power swing. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology (IJARCET), 2(10), 2730-2736.
[21]. Fuerte-Esquivel, C. R., Acha, E., & Ambriz-Perez, H. (2000). A thyristor controlled series compensator model for the power flow solution of practical power networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 15(1), 58-64.
[22]. Garg, L., Agrawal, S. K., & Kumar, V. (2017a). Improvement of power system transient stability using TCSC, SSSC and UPFC. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 8(4), 57-61.
[23]. Garg, L., Agrawal, S. K., & Kumar, V. (2017b). Improvement of transient stability of IEEE -14 bus System by using series FACTS controllers. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 8(10), 280-286.
[24]. German-Sobek, M., Bena, L., & Cimbala, R. (2011). Using of the thyristor controlled series capacitor in electric power system. Elektroenergetika, 4(4), 11-15.
[25]. Ghosh, A., Joshi, A., & Mishra, M. K. (2001). State space simulation and accurate determination of fundamental importance characteristic of a TCSC. In IEEE Winter Power Meeting 2001 (pp. 1099-1104).
[26]. Hingorani, N. G., & Gyugyi, L. (2000). Understanding FACTS: Concepts and technology of flexible AC transmission systems. IEEE Press.
[27]. Hitendrasinh, C. C., & Makwana, V. (2015). Thyristor controlled series capacitor: Simulation and analysis. International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development, 2(5), 796-805.
[28]. Hu, G., Cheng, M., & Cai, G. (2004, November). Relation between fundamental frequency equivalent impedance and resonant point for thyristor controlled th series compensation. In 30 Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2004 (Vol. 2, pp. 1128- 1132). IEEE.
[29]. Janhavi, C. G., & Ratnakar, K. (2015). Performance analysis of an IEEE 9-bus system with TCSC and SSSC. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology, 4(3), 227-235.
[30]. Jindal, A. K., Joshi, A., & Ghosh, A. (2002). Calculation of fundamental impedance characteristic of a TCSC using a normalised model. In Proceeding National Power Systems Conference (NPSC-2002) (pp. 641-646).
[31]. Joshi, H., & Sahay, S. (2017). Analysis of different types of FACTS controllers in a transmission line. International Journal on Emerging Technologies, 243-249.
[32]. Jovcic, D., & Pillai, G. N. (2005). Analytical modeling of TCDC dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 20(2), 1097-1104.
[33]. Juncheng, G., Luyuan, T., Jun, G., & Zhonghong, W. (2002, October). Mathematical model for describing characteristics of TCSC. In Proceedings International Conference on Power System Technology (Vol. 3, pp. 1498- 1502). IEEE.
[34]. Kalaimani, P., & Sundaram, K. M. (2017). Simulation of 9 bus system using PI, PID, FOPID and fuzzy controller with TCSC to improve voltage stability with reduced congestion. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 926-938.
[35]. Kanwar, A., & Saxena, R. (2015). Behavior of TCSC in transmission line using MATLAB/Simulation. International Journal of Innovative Research in Electrical, Electronics, Instrumentation and Control Engineering, 3(5), 195-197.
[36]. Karthikeyan, M., & Eligo, D. M. (2019). Enhancement of power transfer capability in a long transmission line using series facts device. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Mathematics, 8(1), 10-26.
[37]. Kaur, S. (2016). Transient stability using FACTS controller. International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology, 7(1), 201-206.
[38]. Keerthivasan, K., Deve, V. S., Jerome, J., & Ramanujam, R. (2005, December). Modeling of SVC and TCSC for power system dynamic simulation. In 2005, International Power Engineering Conference (pp. 696-700). IEEE.
[39]. Keerthivasan, K., Geetha, & Deve, S. (2014). Performance analysis of SVC, TCSC and UPFC when incorporated in a DTS. International Journal of Electronics & Communication Technology, 5(1), 61-65.
[40]. Khan, M. M., Husain, T., & Ansari, M. M. (2016, December). Stability enhancement in multi-machine power system by FACTS controller. In 2016, International Conference on Global Trends in Signal Processing, Information Computing and Communication (ICGTSPICC) (pp. 414-418). IEEE.
[41]. Khattak, M. Z., & Khan, M. I. (2016). Implementation of thyristor control series capacitor (TCSC) for power flow enhancement in MATLAB/SIMULINK. International Journal of Science and Research, 5(6), 2512-2517.
[42]. Khederzadeh, M. (2007, September). Application of nd TCSC to enhance power quality. In 2007, 42 International universities Power Engineering Conference (pp. 607-612). IEEE.
[43]. Khimsuriya, K. B., & Solanki, M. D. (2016). Power transfer capability improvement of transmission line using TCSC. International Journal for Scientific Research and Development, 4(02), 1428-1431.
[44]. Koundal, G., & Shimi, S. L. (2019). Design, testing, and analysis of STATCOM and TCSC for real-time simulation. World Scientific News, 128(2), 197-215.
[45]. Kumar, A., & Shrivastava, J. (2016). Modeling of power system for improving stability using thyristor controlled series capacitor. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research, 5(5), 1434-1438.
[46]. Kumar, D., & Surjan, B. S. (2013). Transient stability analysis using MATLAB simulink and neural network. International Journal on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, 2(2), 133-138.
[47]. Kumar, S., & Gupta, N. (2015). Modeling, simulation and comparison analysis of various FACTS devices for power stability. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, 789-796.
[48]. Kundur, P. (1994). Power system stability and control. New York: McGraw-Hill Books.
[49]. Lal, G., Dutta, D., & Arunachalam, M. (2008, April). Design and testing of thyristor valves of TCSC for kanpurballabhgarh 400 kV line. In 2008, IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[50]. Li, B. H., Wu, Q. H., Turner, D. R., Wang, P. Y., & Zhou, X. X. (2000). Modeling of TCSC dynamics for control and analysis of power system stability. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 22(1), 43-49.
[51]. Mahajan, V. (2008, October). Power system stability improvement with flexible AC transmission system (FACTS) controller. In 2008, Joint International Conference on Power System Technology and IEEE Power India Conference (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
[52]. Manjusha, K., Balamurugan, S., & Kirthika, N. (2016, January). Real power flow control in transmission system using TCSC. In 2016, Biennial International Conference on Power and Energy Systems: Towards Sustainable Energy (PESTSE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PESTSE.201 6.7516532
[53]. Marlin, S., Jebaseelan, S. S. S., & Ravi, C. N. (2015). Closed loop control for reactive power compensation using combined FACTS devices. ARPN Journal Engineering Applied Science, 10, 9953-9957.
[54]. Mehta, S., & Prakash, S. (2018). Performance evaluation of FACTS controllers for short transmission line. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 13(7), 5140-5153.
[55]. Mittal, N., Kulshrestha, A., & Gupta, R. (2011). A computerized behavioural study of series energy controller for energy flow. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 2(1), 437-441.
[56]. Mohmedhusein, K., Mistry, H., Nai, V., Mubashsir, D., & Kazi, A. (2017). Simulation of TCSC controller for power factor improvement using MATLAB Simulink. International Journal of Research in Engineering Technology, 3(1), 17-20.
[57]. Murali, D., Rajaram, M., & Reka, N. (2010). Comparison of FACTS devices for power system stability enhancement. International Journal of Computer Applications, 8(4), 30- 35.
[58]. Obi, P. I., Iioh, J. P. I., Nwosu, N. (2016). Evaluating the effect of various faults on transient stability using a single machine equivalent (SIME). American Journal of Engineering Research, 5(1), 12-20.
[59]. Padiyar, K. R. (2007). FACTS controllers in power transmission and distribution. New Age International Publisher, New Delhi, India.
[60]. Patel, D., Detroja, K., Patel, M., Rana, K., & Chudasama, P. (2016a). Voltage stability improvement using thyristor controlled series capacitor. International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 3(5), 1-3.
[61]. Patel, M., & Brahmbhatt, A. (2016). Design and simulation of series compensator for enhancement on ATC. International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development, 3(5), 619-626.
[62]. Patel, N. H., Chaudhari, R. B., Surani, R. R., & Raval, H. N. (2017). TCSC modeling and operation. International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Research Development, 4(5), 380-386.
[63]. Patel, N. J., Chanakya, B., & Shailesh, M. (2016b). Implementation of single-phase TCSC at laboratory scale th level. In 4 International Conference on Futuristic Trends in Engineering and Technologies (Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 18-22).
[64]. Patel, N. J., Chanakya, B., & Shailesh, M. (2016c). Influence of TCSC in an interconnected power systems th modeling analysis and interfacing. In 18 International Conference on Innovation in Electrical and Electronics Engineering (Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 26-30).
[65]. Patel, R., Bhatti, T. S., & Kothari, D. P. (2002). MATLAB/Simulink-based transient stability analysis of a multimachine power system. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 39(4), 320-336.
[66]. Patel, R., Mahajan, V., & Pant, V. (2006). Modeling of TCSC controller for transient stability enhancement. International Journal of Emerging Electric Power Systems, 7(1), 1-17.
[67]. Patel, V. J., & Bhatt, C. B. (2012). Simulation and analysis for real and reactive power control with series type facts controller. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 2(3), 7-12.
[68]. Pedekar, A. P. (2016). Enhancement of active power flow capacity of transmission line using series compensation. International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering and Technology, 2(7), 19-22.
[69]. Prabhakar, H., & Prabhu, N. (2016). Simulation and performance evaluation of TCSC for load voltage regulation. International Journal of Innovative Research in Electrical, Electronics, Instrumentation and Control Engineering,3(2), 259-264.
[70]. Prakash, D., & Tripathi, V. K. (2016). Enhancing stability of multi-machine IEEE-9 bus power system network using PSS. International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, 4(5), 4493-4490.
[71]. Prudhviraj, G. V. T., Meikandasivam, S., & Vijayakumar, D. (2013, March). Implementing TCSC device in Kalpakam-Khammam line for power flow enhancement. In 2013, International Conference on Circuits, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT) (pp. 138-141). IEEE.
[72]. Rahman, H., Pathan, I. H., & Harun-Or-Rashid. (2021). Power system stability improvement by using SVC with power system controller. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering and Technology, 1(9), 37-42.
[73]. Raju, R., & Shubhanga, K. N. (2014, December). Implementation of a RTAI-Linux-based PLL and firing pulse generation for a laboratory TCSC. In 2014, IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[74]. Raju, R., & Shubhanga, K. N. (2015, February). Laboratory implementation of a thyristor controlled series capacitor. In 2015, IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Informatics, Communication and Energy Systems (SPICES) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
[75]. Raju, R., & Shubhanga, K. N. (2016, January). Effect of a non-ideal inductor on the performance of a laboratory TCSC and implementation of a current controller. In 2016, Biennial International Conference on Power and Energy Systems: Towards Sustainable Energy (PESTSE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[76]. Rakhonde, A., Mukkawar, S., & Wankhade, M. (2018). Simulation and performance analysis of FACTS controllers in transmission line. International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development, 5(3), 2348-6406.
[77]. Ram, Y., Singh, D. K., & Agrawal, A. (2015). Voltage profile improvement with thyristor controlled series capacitor. International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, 4(6), 4999-5005.
[78]. Ramanujam, R. (2009). Power system dynamics analysis and simulation. New Delhi, India: PHI Learning Pvt Limited.
[79]. Rani, M. K., Bainsla, U., & Saxena, N. (2015a). Comparison of SVC and YCSC for transient stability enhancement of multi-machine 14 bus system. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, 3(3), 1487-1495.
[80]. Rani, P., Singh, M., & Ram, A. (2015b). Enhancement of power system stability using thyristor controlled series compensator (TCSC). International Journal of Innovation in Engineering and Technology, 5(3), 38-42.
[81]. Rao, N. S., Amarnath, J., & Purnachandraro, V. (2013). Enhancement of active reactive power flow in the deregulated power system using SSSC. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 4(11), 275- 282.
[82]. Rathore, U., & Singh, D. K. (2016). A Study to improve the power quality of transmission line using TCSC. International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing, 6(3), 2396-2399.
[83]. Raut, P. P., & Reddy, M. V. (2017). Improvement of real power flow control in transmission system using SSSC. International Journal of Advance Research in Science and Engineering, 6(07), 597-604.
[84]. Raza, A., Farooq, H., Ellahi, M., Ali, W., Kaleem, S., & Khan, M. N. (2019). Design and implementation of TCSC for 500kV power transmission system. Special Issue on Recent Trends in Computer Science and Electronics, 147-155.
[85]. Reddy, P., & Ram, B. S. (2010). TCSC With fuzzy logic power oscillations damping controller to enhance the transient stability of multi machine power system. Journal on Electrical Engineering.
[86]. Rigby, B. S. (2002, October). An AC transmission line power flow controller using a thyristor controlled series th capacitor. In IEEE Africon 6 Africon Conference in Africa (Vol. 2, pp. 773-778). IEEE.
[87]. Rigby, B. S., Ndlovu, C. K., & Harley, R. G. (1999, September). A thyristor controlled series capacitor design th for research laboratory application. In 1999 IEEE Africon 5 Africon Conference in Africa (Vol. 2, pp. 903-908). IEEE.
[88]. Saha, A., Das, P., & Chakraborty, A. K. (2012). Performance analysis and comparison of various FACTS devices in power system. International Journal of Computer Applications, 46(15), 0975-0887.
[89]. Sahu, L. K., Dubey, A., & Soni, S. (2014). Power quality improvement by using TCSC. International Journal of Research Studies in Science, Engineering and Technology,1(2), 56-59.
[90]. Saini, M. K., Yadav, N. K., & Mehra, N. (2013). Transient stability analysis of multi machine power system with FACT devices using MATLAB/Simulink environment. International Journal of Computational Engineering & Management, 16(1), 46-50.
[91]. Salkuti, S. R. (2018). Improvement of transient stability using TCSC. International Journal on Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 10(3), 526-541.
[92]. Sangeetha A. P., Padma S., & Thiyaneswaran, B. (2015). HDL based control circuit for power flow regulation of TCSC. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advancement in Electrical and Electronics Engineering (pp. c20-c24).
[93]. Sangeetha, A. P., & Padma, S. (2014). Study of thyristor controlled series compensator for the enhancement of power flow and stability. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 5, 112-117.
[94]. Sankar, S., Balaji, S., & Arul, S. (2010). Simulation and comparison of various FACTS devices in power system. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2(4), 538-547.
[95]. Selvarasu, R., & Rajan, C. (2012). Simulation of location of TCSC and UPFC in fourteen bus system using Matlab/Simulink. In Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 403, pp. 3594-3599). Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
[96]. Shankar, C. U., Thottungal, R., & Priya, C. S. (2015). Enhancement of transient stability and dynamics power flow control using TCSC. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 3, 324- 331.
[97]. Sharma, P. R., & Hooda, N. (2012). Transient stability analysis of power system using Matlab. International Journal of Engineering Sciences and Research Technology,1(7), 418-422.
[98]. Shingare, S. S. (2015). Modeling and analysis of single machine infinite bus system with and without UPFC for different locations of unsymmetrical fault. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, 3(1), 418-425.
[99]. Shoiab, M., Fundkar, S., Vaidhya, A., & Ladekar, A. (2017). Analysis of TCSC for real and reactive power flow control using MATLAB/SIMULATION. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 3(2), 209- 214.
[100]. Singh, A., & Bharti, S. (2017). Performance investigation of TCSC system for 400 kV Raipur-Rourkela line through simulation. International Journal of Engineering Science and Management, 240-243.
[101]. Singh, A., Singh, S. K., & Srivastava, S. K. (2017). Congestion management in deregulated electricity power market using STATCOM and TCSC. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8(3).
[102]. Singh, R., & Bhatt, A. (2018). Enhancement of voltage and power flow by series FACTS devices using TCSC and SSSC, International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Multidisciplinary Physical Sciences, 6(2), 11- 18.
[103]. Singh, S., Kumar, P., & Ram, A. (2013). Modeling and analysis of thyristor controlled series capacitor using MATLAB/Simulink. International Journal of New Innovations in Engineering and Technology (IJNIET), 1(3), 61-66.
[104]. Sivasankar, A., & Sirish, T. S. (2017). Real power flow control in transmission line using TCSC with fuzzy controller. International Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 7(9), 55-60.
[105]. Sonam, & Garg, V. K. (2016). Study and modeling of thyristor controlled series capacitor for the power improvement in the transmission line. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research, 4, 663-666.
[106]. Soreshjani, M. H., Abjadi, N. R., Kargar, A., & Markadeh, G. A. (2014). A comparison of fuzzy logic and PID controllers to control transmitted power using a TCSC. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 22(6), 1463-1475.
[107]. Sridevi, J. (2014). Implementation of thyristor controlled series capacitor (TCSC) in transmission line model using Arduino. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 4(9), 114-117.
[108]. Srinivas, P., & Krishna, P. R. (2016). Implementation of three phase TCSC controller design for power system stability improvement. International Journal of Research, 3(11), 639-643.
[109]. Suguna, R., Jalaja, S., Pradeep, M., Senthil, R., Srikrishna Kumar, S., & Sugavanam, K. (2016). Transient stability improvement using shunt and series compensators. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(11), 1-11.
[110]. Tan, X., Tong, L., Yin, Z., Zhang, D., & Wang, Z. (1998, August). Characteristics and firing control of thyristor controlled series compensation installations. In 1998, International Conference on Power System Technology (POWERCON'98) Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 672-676). IEEE.
[111]. Thampatty, K. C. S., & Lakshmi, P. G. S. (2016). Design and implementation of TCSC controller for power flow enhancement. International Journal of Engineering Research in Electronics and Communication Engineering, 3(8), 1-7.
[112]. Titus, S., Vinothbabu, B. J., & Nishanth, I. M. A. (2013). Power system stability enhancement under three phase fault with FACTS devices TCSC, STATCOM and UPFC. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(3), 1-6.
[113]. Tiwari, S., & Shukla, S. P. (2012). Compensation by TCSC in open loop control system. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology, 175-179.
[114]. Vashisth, N., & Jamnani, J.G. (2016). Power flow enhancement and control of transmission system using thyristor controlled series capacitor: FACTS controller. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 27-32.
[115]. Xueqiang, Z., & Chen, C. (1999, February). Circuit analysis of a thyristor controlled series compensation. In IEEE Power Engineering Society-1999 Winter Meeting (Vol. 2, pp. 1067-1072). IEEE.
[116]. Yadav, A. S., & Dixit, S. (2017). Placement of TCSC for improvement of power flow. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering and Technology, 6(7), 1105-1108.
[117]. Yang, Y., Zhu, X., Gao, L., Yuan, Y., & Yao, W. (2017). Look-up table approaches for TCSC impedance control considering thyristor conduction characteristic. The Journal of Engineering, 2017(13), 1408-1412.
[118]. Yarlagadda, V., Ram, B. S., & Rao, K. R. M. (2012). Automatic control of Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitor (TCSC). International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA), 2(3), 444-449.
[119]. Zaid, S. A. (2011, June). Thyristor firing circuit synchronization techniques in thyristor controlled series capacitors. In 2011, International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP) (pp. 183-188). IEEE.