Effectiveness Of Multiple Intelligence Based Teaching (Mibt) In Teaching Mathematics For Primary School Students

Xavier P*, P. Annaraja**
*Associate Professor Park University
**,*** Assisatant Professor, Park University
Periodicity:September - November'2007
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.3.2.781

Abstract

Multiple Intelligence Based Teaching (MIBT) applies the multiple intelligence theory in the process of teaching and learning. MIBT explores and develops the intelligence of the students. Also it teaches the content in a multiple way to the students. The objective of the present study is to find out the effectiveness of multiple intelligence based teaching (MIBT) for teaching mathematics for primary school students. Equivalent group experimental design has been selected for conducting the experiment. For each control and experimental groups, 30 sixth standard students have been selected from a school in Karaikal. Finally the study concludes that the experimental group is better than the control group i.e., the Multiple Intelligence Based Teaching (MIBT) method is an effective method for teaching mathematics for primary school students than the traditional method of teaching.

Keywords

Multiple Intelligence, Teaching and Learning.

How to Cite this Article?

Xavier P and P. Annaraja (2007). Effectiveness Of Multiple Intelligence Based Teaching (Mibt) In Teaching Mathematics For Primary School Students. 3(2), 38-42. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.3.2.781

References

[ I ]. Auerbach, C.F. & Silverstein, L.8. (2003). Qual\tat\ve data: An introductlon to coding and analysis, New York: NewYorkUniversity Press.
[2]. Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P, & Major, C. H. (2005). Collaborative learning technlques.' A handbook for college faculyy San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass,
[3]. 8arr, R.8. (1998). Obstacles to implementing the learning paradigm: What it takes to overcome them [Electronic Version]. About Campus 3(4), I 8-25,
[4]. 8arr, R.8. & Tagg, J. (1 995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education [Electronic Version], Change, 27(6), 1 2-25 , (EJ 5 I 6 385) .
[5]. Seana, A. L. (1997). A teaching model that promotes commitment, accountability, and responsibility. EducationalHorizons, 76, 45-52
[6]. Cross, K. P (I 999). What do we know about students' learning and how do we know it? innovatlve Hlgher Education, 23, 255-269.
[7]. Felder, R. M. & Brent, R. (1996). Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction [Electronic Version]. CollegeTeaching, 44(2), 43-48,
[8]. Greene, M. (I 988). The dlalectic of freedom. New York: Teachers College Press, .
[9]. Hall, D. (1997). Computer mediated communication in post-compulsory teacher education, Open Learn\ng, 12(3), 54-56
[10]. Halpern, D. F. (2004). Creating cooperative learning environments. In B. Periman, L. I. McCann, & S. H. McFadden (Eds). Lessons learned: Practical advice for the teaching of psychology (VOL 2) (pp~ I 65- I 73). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association,
[1 I ]. Hansen, E. J. , & Stephens, J. A. (2000). The ethics of learner-centered education: Dynamics that impede the process [Electronic Version]. Change, 33(5), 4 I -47,
[12]. Hassel, H. & Lourey, J. (2005 ) The dea(r)th of student responsibility [Electronic Version], College Teaching, 53( I ), 2- I 3.
[13]. Howell, C. L. (2002). Reforming higher education curriculum to emphasize student responsibility: Waves of rhetoric but glacial change, College Teaching, 50(3), 116-118.
[14]. Howell, C. L~ (2006). Student perceptions of learner- centered education. Presentation at the Annual Conference of the Northern Rocky Mountain Educational Research Association.
[15]. Panitz, T. (n.d.). Cooperative learning (electronic book). Retrieved September 9, 2007 from http://home.capecod,net/~tpanitz/.
[16]. Sheehan, K. (2001). Email survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer Medlated Commun\cat\on, 6 (2),
[I 7]. Mezeske, 8. (2004). Shifting paradigms? Don't forget to tell your students [Electronic Version]~ The Teach\ng Professor, I 8(7), I .
[1 8]. Uribe, D. , Klein, J.D. , & Sullivan, H. (2003). The effect of computer mediated collaborative learning on solving HI-defined problems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51( I ), 5- I 9.
[19]. Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.