Reading Fluency Through Alternative Text: Rereading with an Interactive Sing-to-Read Program Embedded With in a Middle School Music Classroom

Marie C. Biggs *, Nancy A. Watkins**
*,**Assistant Professors, St. Petersburg College of Education, Department of Reading, St, Petersburg, Florida, U.S.A.
Periodicity:June - August'2008
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.4.1.634

Abstract

Singing exaggerates the language of reading. The students find their voices in the rhythm and bounce of language by using music as an alternative technological approach to reading. A concurrent mixed methods study was conducted to investigate the use of an interactive sing-to-read program Tune Into Reading (Electronic Learning Products, 2006) embedded within a heterogeneous music classroom. Measured by the Qualitative Reading Inventory-4 (QRI-4) (Leslie & Caldwell, 2006), the fluency, word recognition, comprehension, and instructional reading level of the treatment students n=32 were compared to their counterparts n=32 who sang as part of the regular music program. Concurrently, this investigation also provided a description of the peers’ interactions during the literacy tasks assigned by the music teacher.

The study findings indicated that the middle school students of varying reading levels significantly improved in their reading scores through the use of this technological approach. Students using the interactive sing-to-read program Tune Into Reading significantly outscored their counterparts who were rereading through singing in the regular music classroom. Furthermore, the use of the interactive program provided opportunities for differentiated reading level achievement. This in turn highly influenced the early adolescent’s motivation, engagement, participation, and successful outcomes in reading fluency.

Keywords

Singing,Technology,Reading Fluency,Early Adolescents,Alternative Text, Middle School,Embedded Literacy,Reading Prosody,Qualitative Reading Inventory-4 (QRI-4).

How to Cite this Article?

Marie C. Biggs and Nancy A. Watkins (2008) Reading Fluency Through Alternative Text: Rereading with an Interactive Sing-to-Read Program Embedded With in a Middle School Music Classroom.i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology. 4(1), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.4.1.634

References

[1]. Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. Journal of EducationalResearch, 97, 17184
[2]. Alexander, R A. (1998). The nature of disciplinary and domain learning: The knowledge, interest, and strategic dimensions of learning from subject-matter text~ In C. Hynd (Ed.), Learning from text across conceptual domains (pp. 263-287). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
[3]. Alexander, R A., & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from traditional and alternative texts: New conceptualization for an information age. In A~ Graesser, M. Gernsbacher, & S, Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of dlscourse processes. Mahwah:Erlbaum~
[4]. Alvermann, D. E. (2002). Effective literacy instruction for adolescents, Journa/Liferacy Research, 34, 189-208,
[5]. Alvermann, D. E., & Phelps, S. R (2005). Content reading and literacy: Succeeding in today s diverse classroom (4fh Ed~), 8oston: Pearson Education~
[6]. Biancarosa, C., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Reading nextA vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2 ed,).Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education~
[7]. Bean, T. W. (2000). Reading in the content areas: Social constfuctivist dimensions, In M.L. Kama, RB. Mosenthal, RD, Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp, 629-644), Mahwah: Erlbaum.
[8]~ Biggs, M. C~, Homan, S.R, Dedrick, R., Minick, V., & Rasinski, T. A. (2008). Using an interactive singing program: A comparative study of middle school struggling readers. Reading Psychology-An Internat!onal Quarterly. Vol. 29 (3) 195-213
[9]. Bogdan, R. & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qua/!fative research for education,' An introduct!on to theor!es and methods (4th Ed~). 8oston: Pearson Education Group~
[1O]. Bulgren, J. A., Schumaker, J. B., Deshler, D. D., Lenz, B. K. , & Marquis, J. (2002).The use and effectiveness of a comparison routine in diverse secondary content classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology 94, 35671.
[1 I ]. Butzlaff, R. (2000). Can music be used to teach reading, Journa/ of Aesthetic Educat!on, 34(3), 167-178,
[ I 2]. Cottle, T. J. (2001). Mind fields-Adolescents consciousness In a culture of distraction, NewYork.' Peter Lang.
[13]. Creswell, J. W, Plano Clark, V. L., Guttman, M., Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research design, In A. Tashahhori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sc!ences, (pp. 209-240), Thousand Oaks,' SagePublications,
[14]. Donahue, R L., Voelkl, J. R., Campbell, J. R., & Mazzeo, J. (1999). NAEP 1998 readlng report card for the natlon and states, Washington, DC: Department of Education .
[15]. Dowhower, D. L. (1991). Speaking of prosody: Fluency's unattended bedfellow. Theory /nto Practlce, 30, I 58- I 64
[I 6]. E\ectron\c Learnlng Systems~ (2006). Carry-a-Tune Learn to Sing Program. Tampa, Florida.
[17]. Elish-Piper, L., & Tatum, A. W (2006). Addressing the literacy needs of adolescent students: Listening to their voice.TheNERAJourna\, 42( I ), I - I 2~
[18]. Glaser, 8. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The dlscovery of grounded theory. Chlcago.' AIdIne Publishing Company
[I 9]. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. Karna, RB. Monsental, RD. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds.) Handbook of Reading Research, 3, 403-422.
[20]. Guthrie, J. T., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Motivating struggling readers in middle school through an engagement mode of classroom practice. Readlng and Wrltlng Quarter\y, I 9, 59-84.
[2 I ]. Hall, L., Scone, N. , Grashel, J. & Watkins, R., Eds. (I 997). Strategies for Teaching: Guide for Music Methods Classes. Reston: Music Educator&National Conference.
[22]. Kamil, M. (2002). Adolescence and literacy: Reading for the 2 I century. A Summary of theResearch.' Natlonal Assessment of Educatlon progress. .
[23]. Kuhn, M.R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of development and remedial practices. Ann Arbor: Center for the /mprovement of EarlyReadlngAchlevement.
[24]. La8erge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading CognltlvePsychology 6, 293-323
[25]. Lamb, S. J., & Gregory, A.H. (1993). The relationship between music and reading in beginning readers. Educaflonal Psychology, I 3, I 9-27.
[26]. Lenz, 8. K, & Deshler, D. D. (2004). Teaching content to all: Evident-based inclusive practices in middle and secondary schools. Boston, USA.
[27]. Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (2006). QualltatlveReadlng Inventory-4. Boston, MA.: Allyn & Bacon.
[28]. Leu, D. J., Jr. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education. In an information age~ In M.L. Kamil, RB. Mosenthal, RD. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of readlng research, 3, 743- 770. NewYork: Longman.
[29]. Merriam, S. 8. & Associates (2002). Qua//tat\ve research In practlce,' Examples for dlscusslon and analysis California: Jossey-Bass,
[30]. Moje, E. 8. , Young, J. R , Readence, J. E. , & Moore, D. W (2000). Reinventing adolescent literacy for new times: Perennial and millennial issues. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(5), 400-4 I 0.
[3 I ]. National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress: The Nation's Report Card, Web site, 2005. Retrieved January 7, 2007, from http://nces.ed~gov/nationsreportcard.
[32]. National Reading Panel Report, (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of scientific-research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction, Washlngton, D. C..' Natlonal Instltute of Ch\\d Health and Human Development.
[33]. No Child Left Behind Act, Department of Education, Washington, D. C. Retrieved January 7, 2007 from htfp://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml
[34]. O'8rien, D. G., Stewart, R. A., & Moje, E. 8. (I 995). Why content literacy is difficult to infuse into the secondary school: Complexities of curriculum, pedagogy, and school culture.ReadlngResearch Quarter\y, 30, 442-463.
[35]. Pearson, R D., Ferdig, R. E., 8lomeyer, Jr, R. L. & Moran, J. (2005). The effects of technology on reading performance in the middle-school grades: A meta- analysis with recommendations for policy. Education, contract number ED-O I -CO-00 I I .
[36]. Phelps, S. (2005). Ten years of research on adolescent literacy, I 994-2004: A review. Learning Point Associates. North Central Regional Laboratory, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, contract number ED-O I -CO-00 I I .
[37]. Pikulski, J.J. (1991), The transition years: Middle School, In J. Flood, J. M. Jensen, D. Lapp & J. R, Squre (Eds,), Handbook of research on teaching the English Language arts (pp. 303-319) Network: Macmillan, .
[38]. Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Creating fluent readers. Educaf/onal Leadership, 6 I (6), 46-5 I
[39]. Ryon, A. M. (2000). Peer group as a context for the socialization of adolescents' motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 101- I 11 .
[40]. Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings.TheReadingTeacher. 41, 756-760.
[41 ]. Schreiber, R A. (I 99 I ). Understanding prosody s role in reading acquisition. Theory into Practice, 30, I 58-164. .
[42]. Schreiber, R S. , & Read, C. (I 9SO). Children's use of phonetic cues in spelling, parsing, and maybe- reading. Bu//et!n of the Orton Soclety, 30, 209-224.
[43]. Stayter, F. Z., & Allington, R. L., (1991). Fluency and the understanding of text. Theory into practice, 30(3), 143-148
[44]. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. (Eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA.' Sage Publicatlons.
[45]. vacca, R. T. & Vacca, J. L. (2002). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across__the curriculum (7fh ed,). Boston MA: Allyn & Bacon,
[46]. Wade, S. E., & Maje, E. B. (2000). The role of text in classroom learning. In M. L. Karna, R B. Mosenthal, R D. Pearson, R. Barr (Eds.). Handbook of readlng research (Vol. 3, pp, 609-627). Mahwah NewYork: Erlbaum~
[47]. Webster, R R. (2002). Computer-based technology and music teaching and learning In R, Colwell& C. Richardson (Eds,), The New Handbook of Research on Music
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.