Preschoolers Know, but How Do they Know? Developing a Framework for Early Epistemology Development

0*, N. Sally Blake**
* Assistant Professor, Educational Psychology & Research Institution. University of Memphis.
** Associate Professor, Instruction, Curriculum, & Leadership Institution, University of Memphis.
Periodicity:February - April'2009
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.4.271

Abstract

Two areas that are lacking for the purpose of training high-quality preschool teachers; and constructing developmentally appropriate learning standards and curriculum for preschool children are; 1) awareness of early epistemic development (beliefs about knowledge and knowing) and 2) understanding preschoolers’ cognitive processes during epistemic development. Personal epistemology is an individual’s beliefs about the nature of knowledge and the process of knowing (Hofer & Pintrich, 1997).  During the past three decades there has been substantial gains in the area of personal epistemology, particularly in college students (Perry, 1970; Baxter Magolda, 1987; Schommer, 1990), adults (King & Kitchener, 1994; Belensky, Clinchy, Goldberger, & Tarule, 1986), and more recently adolescents (Kuhn, 2000; Mansfield & Clinchy, 2002).  Specifically, the use of, inquiry, focus groups, and technology during instruction can identify more observable developmental schemes, such as, cognitive processes (theory of mind), social, and emotional views of the child.  Knowing how these developmental domains operate harmoniously can provide more meaningful insights about “what” and “how” children begin to conceptualize knowledge and the process of knowing. This ecological and epistemic framework can have implications for early childhood education. This article describes new research and thinking about the epistemology of preschool children and how it might influence teacher training and instructional approaches.

Keywords

Bioecological Model Of Human Development, Personal Epistemology, Cognitive Development, Metacognition.

How to Cite this Article?

Denise L. Winsor and N. Sally Blake (2009). Preschoolers Know, but How Do they Know? Developing a Framework for Early Epistemology Development. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(4), 27-53. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.4.271

References

[1]. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1987). The affective dimension of learning: Faculty-student relationships that enhance intellectual development. College Student Journal, 2] , 46-58.
[2]. Baxter Magolda, M. B. [T 992). Cocurricularinfluences on college students‘ intellectual development. Journal of College StudenfDeveIopmenf, 33, 203-21 3.
[3]. Belensky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (T 986]. Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
[4]. Bendixen, L. D. (2002). A process model of epistemic change. In B. K. Hofer and? R. Pintrich (Eds.], Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 191-208). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[5]. Bendixen, L. D., & Rule, D. C. (2004). An integrative approach to personal epistemology: A guiding model. Educational Psychologist, 39(1 ), 69-80.
[6]. Billson, J. M. (1988). Fostering nondeviant lifestyles against the odds: Toward a clinical sociological model of intervention strategies. Adolescence, 23(91 ), 51 7-532.
[7]. Bilson, J.M. (1988) ‘No Owner of Soil: The Concept of Marginality Revisited on its. Sixtieth Birthday‘, international ReviewofModern Sociology 1 8: 1 83-204 Sage Pub.
[8]. Block, B. (1989). Interactive pretense: Social and symbolic skills in preschool play groups. Merril/—Palmer Quarterly, 35(4), 379-397.
[9]. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research foreducation, (4’“ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
[10]. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1978). Who needs parent education? Teachers College Record, 79, 7 73-7 74.
[11]. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Strengthening family systems. In E. F. Zigler & M. Frank (Eds.], The parental leave crisis: Toward a national policy (pp. 358-385). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
[12]. Bronfenbrenner, U., (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
[13]. Bruner, J. S. (1978). The growth of mind. In E. R. Hilgard (Ed.), American psychology in historical perspective (pp. 558-572). Washington D.C.: American PsychologicalAssociation.
[14]. Burr, J., & Hofer, B. K. (2002). Personal epistemology and theory of mind: Deciphering young children's beliefs about knowledge and knowing. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 199-224.
[15]. Carey, S. & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 235-251.
[16]. Carpendale, J. M. & Muller, U. (2004). Social interaction and the development of rationality and morality: An introduction. In J. M. Carpendale & U. Muller (Eds.), Social interaction and the development of knowledge (pp. 289-301). Erlbaum Associates.
[17]. Chandler, M. J., Hallet, D., & Sokol, B. W. (2002). Competing claims about competing knowledge claims. In B. K. Hofer & P R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 145-168).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Associates.
[18]. Dawson, T.L. (2002) New ideas in psychology: commentary on Piaget's stages. The New Ideas in Psychology. Vol. 22, Issue 3, pp 239-247
[19]. Elder, A. D. (2002). Characterizing fifth grade students‘ epistemological beliefs in science. In B. K. Hofer & F: R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 347-363). Mahwah, NJ: Publishers.
[20]. Flavell, J. H. (2000). Development of children's knowledge about the mental world. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 24. 15-23.
[21]. Flavell, J. H. (2004). Theory of mind development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50.3, 274-290.
[22]. Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L., & Flavell, E. R. (1998). The mind has a mind of its own: Developing knowledge about mental uncontrollability. Cognitive Development, 13(1), 127-138.
[23]. Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L., & Flavell, E. R. (1 995). Young children's knowledge about Thinking. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 16(1, Serial No. 243).
[24].Flavell,J.H.,&Miller,PH.(1999). Socialcognition. In W. Damon (Series Ed.], D. Kuhn & R. S.Siegler (Vol. Eds.], Handbook of child psychology, Volume 2, Cogniton, perception, and language (5‘“ ed., pp. 851-898). New York: Wiley.
[25]. Frankland, J & Bloor, M (1999). Some issues arising in In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 144-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd, 1999. pp. 144- 155.
[26]. Gelman, S. A. (2000). The role of essentialism in children's concepts. In H. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 269-283). SanDiego, CA: US Academic Press.
[27]. Gelman. R. & Brenneman (2004). Mathematic and science cognitive development in Mathematical and Scientific Development in Early Childhood: A Workshop Summary(2005). National Academies Press.
[28]. Haerle, F. C. (2006). Personal epistemologies of fourth graders: Their belief about knowledge and knowing. Oldenburg: Didaktischeszentrum.
[29]. Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & R R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about know/edgeand knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[30]. Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational PsychologyReview, 1 3(4), 353-383.
[31]. Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378-405.
[32]. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, R R. (Eds.) (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge andknowing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[33]. Hofer, B. K. & Pintrich, F’. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88-1 40.
[34]. King, R M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment. San Fransico: Jossey—Bass, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[35]. Kitchener, K. S. (2002). Skills, tasks, and definitions: Discrepencies in the understanding and data on the development of folk epistemology. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 309-328.
[36]. Kuhn, D. (2000). Theory of mind, metdcognition and reasoning: A life—span perspective. In R Mitchell, & K. J. Riggs (Eds.) Children's reasoning and the mind (pp. 301 — 326). Hove, England: PsychologyPress.
[37]. Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309-328.
[38]. Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. K. Hofer & F’. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 121-144). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[39]. Lederman, N. & Druger, M. (1 985). Classroom factors related to change in students‘ conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(7), 649-662.
[40]. Lee, K. & Johnson, A.S. (2007). Child Development in Cultural Contexts: Implications of cultural psychology for early childhood teacher education. Early Childhood EducationJournal, 35(3), 233-243.
[41]. Mansfield, A. F., & Clinchy, B. (2002). Toward the integration of objectivity and subjectivity:epistemological development from 10 to 16. New Ideas in Psychology, 20 (2-3), 225-262.
[42]. Mansfield, A., & Clinchy, B. (1985). Early growth in multiplism in the child. Paper submitted at the 15"‘ annual symposium of theJean Piagetsociety, Phildelphia.
[43]. McDermott, P A. (1981). Sources of error in the psychoeducationaldiagnosisof children. Journal of School Psychology, 1 9(1 ), 31 -44.
[44]. Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice. San Francisco: Jossey—Bass.
[45]. Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[46]. Moore, C. (2002). Understanding learning in the postmodern world: Reconstructing the Perry scheme of intellectual and ethical development. In B. K. Hofer & R R. Pintrich (Eds. ), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 17-36). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[47]. National Association for the Education of Young Children (2007). Your community, your opportunity. Washington, DC: Buckley. Retrieved January 30, 2009, from http:///wvvw.annualconference.naeyc.org/
[48]. National Reading Conference (2005) [NRC]. Approaching early reading using social networking. Washington, DC: Lui. Retrieved February 2, 2009,fromhttp://wvvw.newliteracies.uconn.edu/nrc/don_l eu_2005.html
[49]. Perry, W. G. Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. NewYork: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
[50]. Piaget, J. (1971). Psychology and epistemology: Towards a theory of knowledge (A. Rosin, Trans.). New York: The Viking Press.
[51]. Piaget, J. & Inhelder, J. (1969). La psychologie de l'enfant. psychology of the child. Kegan Paul.
[52]. Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). An evolving theoretical framework for an epistemological belief system. In B.K. Paris: Presses Unlversltaries de Francel The London: Routledge & Hofer & RR. Pihtrlch (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychologyof beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 103-1 18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[53]. Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 293-319
[54]. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498-504.
[55]. Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the epistemic belief inventory (EBl). In B. K. Hofer & F‘. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledgeand knowing (pp. 261-2
[56]. Smith, L. (1993). Necessary knowledge: Piagetian perspectives on Constructivism. Hillsdale: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.
[57]. Solomon, M. (2007). Situated Cognition. In R Thagard (Ed.), Philosophy of psychology and cognitive science (pp. 502-51 9). Amsterdam, Netherlands:Holland/ Elsevier.
[58]. Strauss, A & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[59]. Varga, D. (1992). The historical ordering of children's play as a developmental task, Play and Culture, 4, 322-333.
[60]. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[61].Wachs.T. D. (1985). Toys as an aspect ofthe physical environment: Constraints and nature of relationship to development. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 5(3), 3-46.
[62]. Walker, D. K. (1993). Socioemotional measures for preschool and kindergarten children. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
[63]. Weis, R & Lovejoy, M. C. (2002). Information processing in everyday life: Emotion-congruent bias in mother's reports of parent-child interactions. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 83(1 ], 21 6-230.
[64].Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., &Watson, J. (2001). Meta- analysis of theory-of-mind development:The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655-684.
[65]. Wink, J., & Putney, L. (2002). A vision of Vygotsky, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
[66]. Winsor, D. L. (2006). Inter-relatedness of theory of mind and epistemology in young children. Paper presented in F.C. Haerle (Chair), Measuring Children's Personal Epistemology and its Relevance for Education. Symposium conducted at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA.
[67]. Woodruff, G., & Premack. D. (1978). Intentional communication in the chimpanzee: The development of deception. Cognition, 7, 333-362.
[68]. Wohlwill, (1983). Physical and social environment as factors in development. In D. Magnusson &V. Allen (Eds.), Human development: An interactional perspective (pp. 1 1-129). NewYork, NY: Academic Press.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.