‘Prospective Teachers' Stem Attitudes in Relation to their Innovativeness and Lifelong Learning Levels

Sema Altun Yalçin*, Zehra Çakir**
* Department of Science Education, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Turkey.
** Department of Child Development, Bayburt University, Turkey.
Periodicity:September - November'2022
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.18.2.19205

Abstract

The aim of this research was to explore the correlation between prospective teachers' attitudes towards STEM education, their lifelong learning levels, and individual innovativeness. A relational screening model was used, and 190 prospective teachers participated in the study. The research found a positive correlation between STEM attitudes and lifelong learning levels, as well as a positive correlation between STEM attitudes and individual innovativeness levels. Additionally, the research explored whether there were differences in STEM attitudes, individual innovativeness, and lifelong learning levels based on gender and study department variables. Moreover, the research also found a positive significant correlation between the levels of individual innovativeness and lifelong learning. The results showed that the levels of lifelong learning and individual innovativeness are significant predictors of the STEM attitudes of the prospective teachers. Additionally, no significant difference was found between the STEM attitudes, individual innovativeness, and lifelong learning levels of prospective teachers based on their gender. However, a significant difference was found in favor of the prospective science teachers in terms of their lifelong learning and STEM attitudes, when compared to the pre-school and primary school prospective teachers, in terms of their study departments. But there was no difference in individual innovativeness levels between their study departments.

Keywords

STEM, Lifelong Learning, Level of Innovation, Prospective Teacher.

How to Cite this Article?

Yalçin, S. A., and Çakir, Z. (2022). ‘Prospective Teachers' Stem Attitudes in Relation to their Innovativeness and Lifelong Learning Levels. i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 18(2), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.18.2.19205

References

[1]. Acar, D., Tertemiz, N., & Taşdemir, A. (2019). The relationship between mathematics and science problem solving skills and achievements of students who were being educated with STEM. Bartın University Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 12-23.
[2]. Alan, H., & Yeloğlu, O. (2013). Markalaşma ve yenilikçilik. İktisadi Yenilik Dergisi, 1(1), 13-26.
[3]. Altin, S. (2018). Ortaöğretim Öğretmenlerinin Yaşam Boyu Öğrenme Eğilimlerinin İncelemesi (Master's thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
[4]. Yalçın, S. A. (2019). The effect of integrated STEM education on teachers and the opinions of teachers. International Journal of Social Humanities and Administrative Science, 5(20), 948-963.
[5]. Atabey, N., & Topcu, M. S. (2021). The relationship between Turkish middle school students' 21st century skills and STEM career interest: Gender effect. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 7(2), 86-103. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.739586
[6]. Bağcı, E. (2011). Avrupa birliği'ne üyelik sürecinde türkiye'de yaşam boyu eğitim politikaları. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty, 30(2), 139-173.
[7]. Becker, K. H., & Park, K. (2011). Integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students' learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(5), 23-37.
[8]. Blotnicky, K. A., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F., & Joy, P. (2018). A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0118-3
[9]. Can, K. & Sağır, Ş. U. (2018). Views of classroom teachers on science, technology, mathematics and engineering (FETEMM) practices. International Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 6(11), 62-83.
[10]. Çakır, Z. Ç. Z., & Yalçın, S. A. (2020). Pre-School teacher candidates' views on stem applications based on montessori approach. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 11(3), 344-367. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.636526
[11]. Çakir, Z., & Yalçın,, S. A. (2021). The Investigation of the effect of Montessori Approach-based STEM activities on the problem-solving skills of prospective preschool teachers. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 14(2), 93-119. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.824773
[12]. Çakır, Z., & Yalçın, S. A. (2022). The effect of the Montessori approach-based STEM activities on the preschool pre-service teachers' lifelong learning. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1022966
[13]. Coklar, A. N. (2012). Individual ınnovativeness levels of educational administrators. Digital Education Review, 22, 100-110.
[14]. Çuhadar, C., Bülbül, T., & Ilgaz, G. (2013). Exploring of the relationship between ındividual ınnovativeness and techno-pedagogical education competencies of preservice teachers. Ilkogretim Online, 12(3), 797-807.
[15]. Demir, S., & Keleş, S. (2015). Who is innovator? Examining of teachers' innovativeness levels. Eğitim Fakü̧ltesi Dergisi, 30(4), 106-118.
[16]. Coskun, D. Y. (2009). Examining the Lifelong Learning of University Students in Terms of Some Variables. (Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Hacettepe/ Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara, Turkey).
[17]. Dinevski, D., & Dinevski, I. V. (2004). The concepts of university lifelong learning provision in Europe. Transition Studies Review, 11, 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11300-004-0014-z
[18]. Oğuz, K. E. R., & Başeğmez, D. A. (2020). The relation between STEM awareness and self-efficacy belief related to STEM practice of pre-service teachers. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(2), 940-987. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.837613
[19]. Friesen, N., & Anderson, T. (2004). Interaction for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 679-687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00426.x
[20]. Gedik, G. (2019). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Yaşam Boyu Öğrenme Eğilimlerinin İncelenmesi (Manisa-Demirci İlçesi Örneği) (Master's thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
[21]. Guzey, S. S., Harwell, M., & Moore, T. (2014). Development of an instrument to assess attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 271-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12077
[22]. Güleç, İ., Çelik, S., & Demirhan, B. (2012). What is lifelong learning? An evaluation on definition and scope. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 2(3), 34-48.
[23]. Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service teachers' implementation and understanding of STEM project based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63-76.
[24]. Hunde, A. B., & Tacconi, G. (2014). Teacher educators' practices from the view of building lifelong learning capabilities in student teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136(1), 496-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.363
[25]. Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Huma n Communication Research, 4(1), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00597.x
[26]. Kahraman, S., Yılmaz, Z. A., Erkol, M., & Yalçın, S. A. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının eğitsel internet kullanımı öz yeterlik inançlarının incelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 12(4), 1000-1015.
[27]. Kang, M., Kim, J., & Kim, Y. (2013). Learning outcomes of the teacher training program for STEAM education. Korean Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(2), 18-28.
[28]. Karasar, N. (1994). Scientific Research Method: Concepts, Principles, Techniques. 3A education consultancy, Ankara.
[29]. Keleş, Y. E (2019). Examination of Personality Types and Lifelong Learning Efficacy Perceptions of Social Studies Teacher Candidates (Manisa Celal Bayar University Example) (Master's thesis, Institute of Social Sciences).
[30]. Kılıç, H. (2015). İlköğretim Branş Öğretmenlerinin Bireysel Yenilikçilik Düzeyleri ve Yaşam Boyu Öğrenme Eğilimleri (Denizli ili örneği) (Master's thesis, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü).
[31]. Kılıç, H., & Tuncel, Z. A. (2014). Primary subject teachers' individual innovativeness levels and lifelong learning tendencies. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 4(7), 25-37.
[32]. Kılıçer, K. (2011). Individual innovativeness profiles of prospective teachers in computer education and instructional technology. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Anadolu University Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Eskişehir)
[33]. Kilicer, K., & Odabaşı, H. (2010). Individual innovativeness scale (is): the study of adaptation to turkish, validity and reliability. Hacettepe Unıversıty Journal of Educatıon, (38), 150-164
[34]. Korkmaz, Ö. (2009). Teachers' critical thinking level and dispositions. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırsehir Faculty of Education, 10(1), 1-13.
[35]. Kurbanoglu, S., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2007). Ogretmen egitiminde bilgi okur-yazarliginin onemi. Uluslararasi Ogretmen Yetistirme Politikalari ve Sorunlari Sempozyumu (pp. 1-6).
[36]. Lee, J. M., & Shin, Y. J. (2014). An analysis of elementary school teachers' difficulties in the STEM class. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(3), 588-596.
[37]. Nacaroğlu, O., & Kızkapan, O. (2021). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin stem tutumları ve 21. yüzyıl becerilerine sahip olma düzeyleri. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 25(2), 425-442.
[38]. Öner, G., & Yılmaz, Y. O. (2019). Investigation of relationship between middle school students' problem-solving and inquiry learning skills perceptions and their perceptions and attitudes towards STEM. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 8(3), 837-861.
[39]. Patton, M. Q. (2018). Qualitative Research and Evaluations. Ekin Publishing House.
[40]. Ritchhart, R. (2004). Creative teaching in the shadow of the standards. Independent School, 63, 32-40.
[41]. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Person Education.
[42]. Samur, E., & Yalçın, S. A. (2021). Stem etkinliklerinin okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin yansıtıcı düşünme becerileri üzerine etkisi. Bilge Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(1), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.47257/busad.946745
[43]. Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEM mania. Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.
[44]. Özgür, H. (2013). Bilişim teknolojileri öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel düşünme eğilimleri ile bireysel yenilikçilik özellikleri arasındaki ilişkinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 409-420.
[45]. Polat, C., & Odabaş, H. (2008, March). The key to lifelong learning in the information society: Information literacy. In Globalization, democratization and Turkey International Symposium.
[46]. Teyfur, M. (2007). Eğitim bilimlerinde yeni yaklaşımlar. Eğitim Bilimine Giriş (pp. 316-353).
[47]. Uzunboylu, H., & Hürsen, Ç. (2011). Lifelong learning competence scale (LLLCS): The study of validity and reliability. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41(41), 449-460.
[48]. Ünal, K. & Akay, C. (2017). Öğretmenlik mesleği ve yaşam boyu öğrenme: öğretmen adayları penceresinden. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(3), 821-838. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.339943
[49]. Yenice, N., & Tunç, G. A. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri ile bireysel yenilikçilik düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(2), 753-765. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2716
[50]. Yılmaz, H., Koyunkaya, M. Y., Güler, F., & Güzey, S. (2017). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik, matematik (STEM) eğitimi tutum ölçeğinin Türkçe'ye uyarlanması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 25(5), 1787-1800.
[51]. Yılmaz, R., & Beşkaya, Y. M. (2018). Investigation of lifelong learning trends and individual innovativeness level of education administrators. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 51(1), 159-181.
[52]. Yüksel, R. (2020). Fen Bilimleri Öğretmenlerinin Bireysel Yenilikçilik Düzeyi, Yaşam Boyu Öğrenme Eğilimleri İle STEM Uygulamaları Özyeterlik Algıları ve Aralarındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi (Master's thesis, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü).
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.