Evaluation of Ground Motion Response Spectra for Coupled Translation and Rotational Tilts

Engammagari Ganesh*
National Center for Defense Manufacturing & Machining, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Periodicity:September - November'2021
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jce.11.4.18462

Abstract

Rotational and vertical parts of ground movement are quite often overlooked in plan or in the appraisal of structures in spite of the way that vertical movement can be twice as much as the even movement and may surpass 2g level, and rotational excitation may arrive at barely any degrees in the closeness of deficiency crack. Coupling of various parts of ground excitation may essentially enhance the seismic interest by presenting extra horizontal powers and upgraded force deflection impacts. In this paper, an overseeing condition of movement is hypothesized to figure the reaction of a Single-Degree-of-Freedom Linear Oscillator (SDOF) under a multi-part excitation. The extended condition incorporates auxiliary force deflection parts related with the joined effects of tilt and vertical excitations notwithstanding the inertial compelling terms because of the precise and translational increasing speeds.

Keywords

Rotational Motion, Tilt, Vertical Acceleration, Response Spectrum, Force Deflection Effects.

How to Cite this Article?

Ganesh, E. (2021). Evaluation of Ground Motion Response Spectra for Coupled Translation and Rotational Tilts. i-manager’s Journal on Civil Engineering, 11(4), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.26634/jce.11.4.18462

References

[1]. Akkar, S., Sucuoğlu, H., & Yakut, A. (2005). Displacement-based fragility functions for low-and mid-rise ordinary concrete buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 21(4), 901-927. https://doi.org/10.1193%2F1.2084232
[2]. Baker, J. W., & Cornell, C. A. (2005). A vector valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 34(10), 1193-1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.474
[3]. Barbat, A. H., Moya, F. Y., & Canas, J. (1996). Damage scenarios simulation for seismic risk assessment in urban z o n e s. E a r t h q u a ke S p e c t r a , 1 2 ( 3 ) , 3 7 1 - 3 9 4 . https://doi.org/10.1193%2F1.1585889
[4]. Beulah, R., & Rajaram, C. (2019). Evaluation of seismic damage parameters for reinforced concrete frame buildings. Internal Conference on Innovative Trends in Civil Engineering for Sustainable Development (ITCSD-2019), Warangal.
[5]. Biskinis, D. E., Roupakias, G. K., & Fardis, M. N. (2004). Degradation of shear strength of reinforced concrete members with inelastic cyclic displacements. Structural Journal, 101(6), 773-783.
[6]. Bouchon, M., & Aki, K. (1982). Strain, tilt, and rotation associated with strong ground motion in the vicinity of earthquake faults. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 72(5), 1717-1738. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0720051717
[7]. Bozorgnia, Y., & Bertero, V. V. (2001). Evaluation of damage potential of recorded earthquake ground motion. Seismological Research Letters, Vol.72, pp. 233.
[8]. Fardis, M. N. (2000, November). Eurocode 8–Present state, pre-normative and co-normative research needs (including design seismic action). In Proceedings of the Workshop on Mitigation of Seismic Risk Support to Recently Affected European Countries, European Commission-JRC, Belgirate (VB), Italy (pp. 1-10).
[9]. Graizer, V. M. (2006). Equation of pendulum motion including rotations and its implications to the strongground motion. In Earthquake source asymmetry, structural media and rotation effects (pp. 471-485). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31337-0_34
[10]. Jamaluddin, M. F. (2011). Performance of low rise building due to the earthquake. Thesis. University Technology MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia.
[11]. Mpampatsikos, V., Nascimbene, R., & Petrini, L. (2008). A critical review of the RC frame existing building assessment procedure according to Eurocode 8 and Italian seismic code. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 12(S1), 52-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460801925020
[12]. Nyhoff, L., & Leestma, S. (1996). FORTRAN 77 for Engineers and Scientists with an Introduction to FORTRAN 90 (4th Ed.), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
[13]. Rajaram, C., & Kumar, R. P. (2014). Vulnerability Assessment of Coastal Structure: A Study on Port Buildings. International Journal of Education and Applied Research, 4(2), 9-15.
[14]. Trifunac, M. D. (1971). Zero baseline correction of strong-motion accelerograms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 61(5), 1201-1211. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0610051201
[15]. Trifunac, M. D., & Hudson, D. E. (1971). Analysis of the Pacoima dam accelerogram—San Fernando, California, earthquake of 1971. Bulletin of the seismological Society of America, 61(5), 1393-1411. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0610051393
[16]. Trifunac, M. D., & Todorovska, M. I. (1998). Nonlinear soil response as a natural passive isolation mechanism—the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 17(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(97)00028-6
[17]. Tselentis, G. A., & Makropoulos, K. C. (1986). Rates of crustal deformation in the Gulf of Corinth (central Greece) as determined from seismicity. Tectonophysics, 124(1-2), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(86)90137-X
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.