i-manager Publications

E–Learning Trioengineering: Designing Interactive Infometrics using the 4A Metric Algorithmic Standards © for Systemic Student Success via Mastery Learning to Enhance, Produce and Sustain Authentic Expertise; Creative Confidence; Innovative Ideas; and Self-Efficacy

James Edward Osler II*

North Carolina Central University, United States.

Periodicity:July - September'2021
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.18.2.17449

Abstract

This paper provides a novel instructional methodology that is designed to conceptually address the four main challenges faced by 21^st century students, who must learn in a multitude of educational settings (face to face, hybrid and online). The online learning neuroscience supported instructional methodology detailed in this article also provides an active solution that when implemented addresses the needs of Colleges and Universities who desire new methods to achieve their academic goal (such as increase student retention and graduation rates, and respond to their high standards of academic rigor) (Osler & Wright, 2016). The use of the “E-Learning Trioengineering” also adds value to informative investigative inquiry through the efficacy of digital instruments and tools via eduscientifically–engineered (Osler, 2013a) research designs (Osler, 2015a). Additional research into “E-Learning Trioengineered” online solutions will further advance learning, and conversely, learning solutions that are much needed in digital classrooms.

Keywords

4A Metric ©, Brain-Based Learning, Cohesive Statement, Logic, Cognition, Cognitive Science, Eduscience, Emotional Intelligence, Epigenetics, Instructional Design, Inventive Investigative Instrument, Learning, Mathematical Model, Online Learning, Outcomes, Neuroanatomy, Neurobiology, Neurocardiology, Neurocognitive, Neurodidactics, Neuroeducation/Educational Neurogenesis, Neuroengineering, Neurolaw, Neuromathematics, Neurology, Neuroplasticity, Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, Neuroscience, Neurotechnology, Notation, Rational, Recidivism (in deference to “Academic Cheating”), Research, Tri–Squared Test, Trichotomy, Trioengineering, Trioinformatics, Triple–I, Variables.

How to Cite this Article?

Osler, J. E., II. (2021). E–Learning Trioengineering: Designing Interactive Infometrics using the 4A Metric Algorithmic Standards © for Systemic Student Success via Mastery Learning to Enhance, Produce and Sustain Authentic Expertise; Creative Confidence; Innovative Ideas; and Self-Efficacy. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 22-52. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.18.2.17449

References

[1]. AAN. (2012). Working with Your Doctor. American Academy of Neurology.

[2]. Adkins, S.S. (2004). Beneath the tip of the iceberg: Technology plumbs the affective learning domain. T+D Magazine, 58(2), 28-33.

[3]. Apostol, T. M. (1967). Calculus (2^nd Ed.). One–variable calculus, with an introduction to linear algebra (Vol 1). Waltham, MA: Blaisdell.

[4]. Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2010). Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[5]. Atta, H. M. (1999). Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus: The oldest known surgical treatise. The American Surgeon, 65 (12), 1190-1192.

[6]. Beane, J. A., Toepfer, C. F., & Alessi, S. J. (1986). Curriculum Planning and Development. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

[7]. Careers in Psychology. (2015). How to become a neuropsychologist: Your complete guide to degrees & careers in neuropsychologist. Neuropsychology Careers.

[8]. Carrero, M. D. (2011). One vital organ: Heart is more than a pump. The Morning Call.

[9]. Cherry, K. (2020). What is Cognition? Verywell Mind.

[10]. Cobarrubias, S. (2014). What is neuroplasticity? Definition, depression & quiz. Education Portal.

[11]. Cognitive Science. (2010). Cognitive Science, Yale University.

[12]. Dettmer, P. (2005). New blooms in established fields: Four domains of learning and doing. Roeper review, 28(2), 70-78.

[13]. Eagleman, D. M. (2011). The brain on trial. The Atlantic. (July-August 2011), 112-123.

[14]. Fannin, J. L., & Williams, R. (2012). Leading-Edge neuroscience reveals significant correlations between beliefs, the whole-brain state, and psychotherapy. CQ: The CAPA Quarterly, 14-17.

[15]. Feidakis, M., & Daradoumis, T. (2013). A framework for designing computer supported learning systems with sensibility. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 9(1), 57-70.

[16]. Gage, N. L., & Berliner, D. C. (1988). Educational psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

[17]. Goodfriend, W. (2014). What is learning? - Understanding effective classroom strategies. Education Portal.

[18]. Green, K. J. (1998). Schizophrenia from a Neurocognitive Perspective. Boston, Allyn and Bacon.

[19]. Hidden Curriculum. (2014, August 26). Education reform. In S. Abbott (Ed.), The glossary of education reform.

[20]. Hinton, C., Fischer, K. W., & Glennon, C. (2012). Mind, brain, and education. Mind, Students at the Center.

[21]. Kawashima, R. (2006). Brain Age. Train your brain in minutes a day! NintendoDs.f

[22]. Kulik, C. L. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1987). Mastery testing and student learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 15(3), 325-345.

[23]. Law and Neuroscience. (2014). The MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience. Vanderbilt University.

[24]. Mandal, A. (2014). What is neurogenesis? News- Medical.Net.

[25]. Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., Pratt, J., & ID₂ Research Group. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology, 36(5), 5-7.

[26]. Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Neuroscience, In Merriam- Webster online.

[27]. Nouri, A., & Mehrmohammadi, M. (2012). Defining the boundaries for neuroeducation as a field of study. Educational Research Journal, 27(1/2), 1-25.

[28]. Osler, J. E. & Mason, L. R. (2015). Neuromathematical trichotomous mixed methods analysis: Using the neuroscientific Tri–Squared Test Statistical Metric as a post hoc analytic to determine North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics leadership efficacy. i-manager's Journal on Educational Psychology, 9(3), 44-61.

[29]. Osler, J. E. & Waden, C. (2012). Using innovative technical solutions as an intervention for at risk students: A meta–cognitive statistical analysis to determine the impact of ninth grade freshman academies, centers, and center models upon minority student retention and achievement. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 8(2), 11–23.

[30]. Osler, J. E. & Wright, M. A. (2016). Neuro–Holistic Learning ©: An integrated Kinesthetic approach to Cognitive Learning © using Collaborative Interactive Thought Exchange © in a blended environment to enhance the learning of young African American males. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 1–9.

[31]. Osler, J. E. (2010a). Infometrics™ ©: The Systemic Strategic Practice of Empowerment through the Creation of an Ideal Learning Environment via Optimal Instruction (1^st Ed.). Lulu Publishing, Morrisville NC.

[32]. Osler, J. E. (2010b). Visualus™ © visioneering volumetrically: The mathematics of the innovative problem–solving model of inventive instructional design (1^st Ed.). Lulu Publishing, Morrisville NC.

[33]. Osler, J. E. (2012). Trichotomy–Squared – A novel mixed methods test and research procedure designed to analyze, transform, and compare qualitative and quantitative data for education scientists who are administrators, practitioners, teachers, and technologists. i-manager's Journal on Mathematics, 1(3), 23–32.

[34]. Osler, J. E. (2013a). The psychometrics of educational science: Designing trichotomous inventive investigative instruments for qualitative and quantitative for inquiry. i-manager's Journal on Educational Psychology, 8(3), 15–22.

[35]. Osler, J. E. (2013b). The psychological efficacy of education as a science through personal, professional, and contextual inquiry of the affective learning domain. i-manager's Journal on Educational Psychology, 6(4), 36–41.

[36]. Osler, J. E. (2013c). Proximal positive parallel notation: A novel method of expressing mathematical complements, collaborations, and combinations. i-manager's Journal on Mathematics, 2(4), 21–32.

[37]. Osler, J. E. (2013d). Transformational research engineering: Research design metrics for in–depth and empowering K–12 teacher professional development. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 9(1), 43–60.

[38]. Osler, J. E. (2014). Triostatistics: The application of innovative in–depth advanced post hoc statistical metrics for the assessment and analysis of statistically significant tri–squared test outcomes. Kentucky Journal of Excellence in College Teaching and Learning, 12(3), 27–39.

[39]. Osler, J. E. (2015a). Trioinformatics: The innovative and novel logic notation that defines, explains, and expresses the rational application of the law of trichotomy for digital instrumentation and circuit design. i-manager's Journal on Circuits and Systems, 3(2), 1–7.

[40]. Osler, J. E. (2015b). AMOVA [“Accumulative Manifold Validation Analysis”]: An Advanced Statistical Methodology Designed to Measure and Test the Validity, Reliability, and Overall Efficacy of Inquir y–Based Psychometric Instruments. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 12(3), 19-29.

[41]. Osler, J. E. (2016). The 4A Metric Algorithm: A unique elearning engineering solution designed via neuroscience to counter cheating and reduce its recidivism by measuring student growth through systemic sequential online learning. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 12(2), 44-61.

[42]. Osler, J. E. (2017a). An innovative psychometric model for dynamic educational testing that is a sequential section of the 4A Metric Algorithm as repetitive mastery testing. i-manager's Journal on Educational Psychology, 10(4), 19-28.

[43]. Osler, J. E. (2018a). The 4A Metric Algorithm Standards E-Book © (1^st ed.). OSI © in partnership with Morrisville, NC: Lulu Publications.

[44]. Osler, J. E. (2018b).Trioengineering interapplication and comprehensive cohesive cogitation: The use of systemic neuromathematical trioinformatics to create, define, and express trichotomous research instrumentation and tri–squared analytics. i-manager's Journal on Mathematics, 7(3), 10–29.

[45]. Osler, J. E. (2018c). Trioengineering: The procedures that use trioinformatics neuroengineering neuromathematics notation to express, build, define, and inform the application of the trichotomous–based inquiry in digital research design. i-manager's Journal on Circuits and Systems, 6(4), 1–15.

[46]. Osler, J. E., (2017b). Triangular Equation Modeling [TEM]: The base operation, basic rationale, and foundational logic that is the basis for “Research Architectural Metrics” that are essential to the planning, scope, and schema of trichotomous research designs. i-manager's Journal on Mathematics, 6(3), 1–11.

[47]. Perlmutter, D. (2011). Regenerating the brain. The Well Being Journal. 20(3), 3-10.

[48]. Petoft, A. (2015). Neurolaw: A brief introduction. Iranian Journal of Neurology, 14(1), 53-58.

[49]. Pink, D. H., & Pink, D. H. (2005). A whole new mind: Moving from the information age to the conceptual age (Vol. 50). New York: River head Books.

[50]. Posner, M. I., & DiGirolamo, G. J. (2000). Cognitive neuroscience: Origins and promise. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 873–889.

[51]. Ratey, J. J. (2008). Spark: The revolutionary new science of exercise and the brain. Hachette UK.

[52]. Ronan, G. B. (2005, November 29). College freshmen face major dilemma. NBC News Retrieved from https:// www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna10154383

[53]. Rust, J., & Golombok, S. (1989). Modern psychometrics: The science of psychological assessment (2nd ed.). Florence, KY: Taylor & Frances/Routledge

[54]. Sabitzer, B. (2011). Neurodidactics–a new stimulus in ICT and computer science education. In INTED 2011 Proceedings, 5881-5889.

[55]. Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12-20.

[56]. Sawyer, R. K. (2011). Commentary: The need for a deeper exploration and conceptual understanding: The critical role of creativity and collaboration in real-world learning. Learning Landscapes, 5(1), 27-35.

[57]. Sensagent. (2012). In Online Dictionary.

[58]. Singh, S., & Rintoul, D. (1997). Fermat's last theorem (p. 31). London: Fourth Estate.

[59]. The Royal Society. (2011). Neuroscience: Implications for education and lifelong learning. London: The Royal Society.

[60]. UC-Berkeley. (2014). Neurobiology. Molecular and Cell Biology UC-Berkeley Molecular and Cell Biology Department.

[61]. Weiss, R. P. (2001). The mind-body connection in learning. Trans4mind.

[62]. Yudofsky, S. C., & Hales, R. E. (2002). Neuropsychiatry and the future of psychiatry and neurology. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159(8), 1261-1264.

[63]. Zymo Research. (n.d.). Overview-Epigenetics.

E–Learning Trioengineering: Designing Interactive Infometrics using the 4A Metric Algorithmic Standards © for Systemic Student Success via Mastery Learning to Enhance, Produce and Sustain Authentic Expertise; Creative Confidence; Innovative Ideas; and Self-Efficacy

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content:

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25