Determination of Ethics in Web Designing and Evaluation

Satinder Kaur *, Sunil Kumar Gupta **
* Research Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IKG Punjab Technical University, Kapurthala, India and Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Guru Nanak Dev University, Punjab, India.
** Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Beant College of Engineering and Technology, Punjab, India.
Periodicity:December - February'2018
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jit.7.1.14096

Abstract

Due to rapid development in the web era, one must know the main issues which are involved in the design, evaluation, and enhancement of the website. These issues carry out the identical importance for all persons, whether they are designers, users or managers. These issues are also having a large implication for researchers, who delve into the discipline of web evaluation. User satisfaction plays a major role in the success of a website. This paper aims to discuss the issues related to the discipline of web development and enhancement. In-depth study of reputed research papers has been conducted to determine different persons involved in website designing and to identify their goals, as well as to find different domains of websites. Different evaluation criteria and evaluation methods have also been attained from the previous studies conducted in the discipline. The paper concludes with the proposal of few guidelines, which must be kept in mind during the website construction and evaluation. A modular approach for the website evaluation is proposed by recognizing the role of the various persons involved while achieving a quality website.

Keywords

Web Domains, Usability Metrics, Web Evaluation, Web Assessment, Web Designing.

How to Cite this Article?

Kaur, S., & Gupta, S.K. (2018). Determination of Ethics in Web Designing and Evaluation. i-manager’s Journal on Information Technology, 7(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.26634/jit.7.1.14096

References

[1]. Achour, H., & Bensedrine, N. (2005). An evaluation of internet banking and online brokerage in Tunisia. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on E-Business and E-learning (EBEL), Amman, Jordan, 147-158.
[2]. Afonso, A. P., Lima, J. R., & Cota, M. P. (2012). A heuristic evaluation of usability of Web interfaces. In Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 2012 7th Iberian Conference on (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[3]. Aladwani, A. M., & Palvia, P. C. (2002). Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality. Information & Management, 39(6), 467-476.
[4]. Alhelalat, J., Ineson, E. M., Jung, T., & Evans, K. (2008). The Evaluation of Hotel Websites' Quality, Usability and Benefits: Developing a Testing Model. In Proceedings of Euro-CHRIE Conference.
[5]. Alomari, M., Woods, P., & Sandhu, K. (2012). Predictors for e-government adoption in Jordan: Deployment of an empirical evaluation based on a citizen-centric approach. Information Technology & People, 25(2), 207- 234.
[6]. Alsmadi, I., Al-Taani, A. T. & Zaid, N. A. (2010). Web Structural Metrics Evaluation. Developments in E-systems Engineering (pp. 225-230). IEEE.
[7]. Asmaran, M. (2016). Quantitative & Qualitative Evaluation of Three Search Engines (Google, Yahoo, and Bing). American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS), 26(2), 97-106.
[8]. Bai, B., Law, R., & Wen, I. (2008). The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and purchase intentions: Evidence from Chinese online visitors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(3), 391-402.
[9]. Baloglu, S., & Pekcan, Y. A. (2006). The website design and internet site marketing practices of upscale and luxury hotels in Turkey. Tourism Management, 27(1), 171- 176.
[10]. Barnes, S. J., & Vidgen, R. (2004). Interactive e-government: evaluating the web site of the UK Inland Revenue. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), 2(1), 42-63.
[11]. Barnes, S. J., & Vidgen, R. T. (2006). Data triangulation and web quality metrics: A case study in e-government. Information & Management, 43(6), 767- 777.
[12]. Bastida, U., & Huan, T. C. (2014). Performance evaluation of tourism websites' information quality of four global destination brands: Beijing, Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Taipei. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 167-170.
[13]. Bauernfeind, U., & Mitsche, N. (2008). The application of the data envelopment analysis for tourism website evaluation. Information Technology & Tourism, 10(3), 245-257.
[14]. Becker, P., Lew, P., & Olsina, L. (2012). Specifying process views for a measurement, evaluation, and improvement strategy.Advances in Software Engineering, 2012, 2-29.
[15]. Büyüközkan, G., Ruan, D., & Feyzioğlu, O. (2007). Evaluating e‐learning web site quality in a fuzzy environment. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 22(5), 567-586.
[16]. Cebi, S. (2013a). Determining importance degrees of website design parameters based on interactions and types of websites. Decision Support Systems, 54(2), 1030- 1043.
[17]. Cebi, S. (2013b). A quality evaluation model for the design quality of online shopping websites. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(2), 124-135.
[18]. Chiemeke, S. C., Evwiekpaefe, A. E. & Chete, F. O. (2006). The adoption of Internet banking in Nigeria: An empirical investigation. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 11(3), 1-10.
[19]. Chinthakayala, K. C., Zhao, C., Kong, J., & Zhang, K. (2014). A comparative study of three social networking websites. World Wide Web, 17(6), 1233-1259.
[20]. Chiou, W. C., Lin, C. C., & Perng, C. (2010). A strategic framework for website evaluation based on a review of the literature from 1995–2006. Information and Management, 47(5), 282-290.
[21]. Chiou, W. C., Lin, C. C., & Perng, C. (2011). A strategic website evaluation of online travel agencies. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1463-1473.
[22]. Chmielarz, W., & Zborowski, M. (2016). Comparative Analysis of Electronic Banking Websites in Poland in 2014 and 2015. In Information Technology for Management, 147-161. Springer International Publishing.
[23]. Chu, S. C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75.
[24]. Corigliano, M. A., & Baggio, R. (2006). On the significance of tourism website evaluations. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism, 320-331.
[25]. Denning, P. J., Comer, D. E., Gries, D., Mulder, M. C., Tucker, A., Turner, A. J. & Young, P. R. (1989). Computing as a discipline. Computer, 22(2), 63-70.
[26]. Ellahi, A., & Bokhari, R. H. (2013). Key quality factors affecting users' perception of social networking websites. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(1), 120-129.
[27]. Gabriel, I. J. (2007). Usability metrics for measuring usability of business-to-consumer (b2c) e-commerce sites. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual ISOnEworld Conference.
[28]. Garcia, A., Maciel, C. & Pinto, F. (2005). A quality inspection method to evaluate e-government sites. Electronic Government, 198-209.
[29]. Greene, J. A., Choudhry, N. K., Kilabuk, E. & Shrank, W. H. (2011). Online social networking by patients with diabetes: a qualitative evaluation of communication with Facebook. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26(3), 287-292.
[30]. Grimsley, M., & Meehan, A. (2007). e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 134-148.
[31]. Gullikson, S., Blades, R., Bragdon, M., McKibbon, S., Sparling, M., & Toms, E. G. (1999). The impact of information architecture on academic web site usability. The Electronic Library, 17(5), 293-304.
[32]. Henriksson, A., Yi, Y., Frost, B., & Middleton, M. (2007). Evaluation instrument for e-government websites. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 4(2), 204-226.
[33]. Hwang, G. J., Huang, T. C., & Tseng, J. C. (2004). A group-decision approach for evaluating educational web sites. Computers & Education, 42(1), 65-86.
[34]. Howitt, A., Clement, S., de Lusignan, S., Thiru, K., Goodwin, D., & Wells, S. (2002). An evaluation of general practice websites in the UK. Family Practice, 19(5), 547- 556.
[35]. Ip, C., Law, R. & Lee, H. A. (2011). A review of website evaluation studies in the tourism and hospitality fields from 1996 to 2009. International Journal of Tourism Research, 13(3), 234-265.
[36]. International Organization for Standardization/ International Electrotechnical Commission (1991). Software product evaluation – quality characteristics and guidelines for their use (ISO/IEC Standard No. 9126). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/16722.html
[37]. International Organization for Standardization (1994). Quality management and quality assurance – Vocabulary (ISO Standard No. 8402). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/20115.html
[38]. International Organization for Standardization (1998). Guidelines for specifying and measuring usability (ISO Standard No. 9241-11). Retrieved from https://www. iso.org/standard/16883.html
[39]. International Organization for Standardization (1999). Human-centred design processes for interactive systems (ISO Standard No.13407). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/21197.html
[40]. International Organization for Standardization/ Technical Report (2000). Ergonomics of human–system interaction . Human- centred life cycle process descriptions (ISO Standard No.18529). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/33499.html
[41]. International Organization for Standardization/ Technical Report (2002). Ergonomics of human–system interaction. Usability methods supporting human-centred design (ISO Standard No.16982). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/31176.html
[42]. International Organization for Standardization/ International Electrotechnical Commission (2004). Information technology – process assessment (ISO Standard No. 15504-1). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/38932.html
[43]. International Organization for Standardization (2008). Software ergonomics for World Wide Web user interfaces (ISO Standard No.9241-151). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/37031.html
[44]. International Organization for Standardization/ International Electrotechnical Commission (2011). Systems and software engineering – Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – Software product quality and system quality in use models (ISO Standard No. 25010). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/35733.html
[45]. Jansen, B. J., & Spink, A. (2006). How are we searching the World Wide Web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs. Information Processing & Management, 42(1), 248-263.
[46]. Jati, H., & Dominic, D. D. (2009). Quality evaluation of e-government website using web diagnostic tools: Asian case. In Information Management and Engineering, 2009. ICIME'09. International Conference on (pp. 85-89). IEEE.
[47]. Joo, S., Lin, S. & Lu, K. (2011). A usability evaluation model for academic librar y websites: efficiency, effectiveness and learnability. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 9(2), 11-26.
[48]. Kaur, A., & Dani, D. (2013). The Web Navigability Structure of E-Banking in India. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science (IJITCS), 5(5), 29-37.
[49]. Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F. & Tsuji, S. (1984). Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality. Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control (In Japanese), 14(2), 39-48.
[50]. Keenan, A., & Shiri, A. (2009). Sociability and social interaction on social networking websites. Library Review, 58(6). 438-450.
[51]. Kincl, T., & Štrach, P. (2012). Measuring website quality: asymmetric effect of user satisfaction. Behaviour and Information Technology, 31(7), 647-657.
[52]. Korda, H., & Itani, Z. (2013). Harnessing social media for health promotion and behavior change. Health Promotion Practice, 14(1), 15-23.
[53]. Law, R., Qi, S. & Buhalis, D. (2010). Progress in tourism management: A review of website evaluation in tourism research. Tourism Management, 31(3), 297-313.
[54]. Lee, S., & Koubek, R. J. (2010). The effects of usability and web design attributes on user preference for e-commerce web sites. Computers in Industry, 61(4), 329- 341.
[55]. Lin, K. Y., & Lu, H. P. (2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behaviour, 27(3), 1152-1161.
[56]. Lu, J., & Lu, Z. (2004). Development, distribution and evaluation of online tourism services in China. Electronic Commerce Research, 4(3), 221-239.
[57]. Lu, Y., Deng, Z. & Wang, B. (2007). Analysis and evaluation of tourism e-commerce websites in China. International Journal of Services, Economics and Management, 1(1), 6-23.
[58]. Malhotra, R., & Sharma, A. (2013). A neuro-fuzzy classifier for website quality prediction. In Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), 2013 International Conference on (pp. 1274-1279). IEEE.
[59]. Martins, E. N., & Morse, L. S. (2005). Evaluation of internet websites about retinopathy of prematurity patient education. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 89(5), 565- 568.
[60]. Mavromoustakos, S., & Andreou, A. S. (2006). WAQE: A web application quality evaluation model . International journal of Web Engineering and Technology, 3(1), 96-120.
[61]. Medina, N. M., Burella, J., Rossi, G., Grigera, J., & Luna, E. R. (2010). An incremental approach for building accessible and usable web applications. In International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (pp. 564-577). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[62]. Mich, L., Franch, M., & Cilione, G. (2003). The 2QCV3Q Quality Model for the Analysiy of Web site Requirements. J. Web Eng., 2(1-2), 115-127. Sep 1;2(1- 2):115-27 (2003)
[63]. Mich, L. (2014). Evaluating website quality by addressing quality gaps: A modular process. In Software Science, Technology and Engineering (SWSTE), 2014 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 42-49). IEEE.
[64]. Moreno, J. M., Del Castillo, J. M., Porcel, C. & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2010). A quality evaluation methodology for health-related websites based on a 2- tuple fuzzy linguistic approach. Soft Computing, 14(8), 887-897.
[65]. Morrison, A. M., Taylor, J. S. & Douglas, A. (2005). Website evaluation in tourism and hospitality: the art is not yet stated. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 17(2-3), 233-251.
[66]. Naeimeh, E., Sheida, S. & Aryati, B. (2013). An Effective Model for Evaluating Website Quality Considering Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: Evidence of Airline Websites. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 10(2).
[67]. Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user inter faces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems (pp. 249-256). ACM.
[68]. Neiger, B. L., Thackeray, R., Van Wagenen, S. A., Hanson, C. L., West, J. H., Barnes, M. D., & Fagen, M. C. (2012). Use of social media in health promotion: purposes, key performance indicators, and evaluation metrics. Health Promotion Practice, 13(2), 159-164.
[69]. Olsina, L., & Rossi, G. (2002). A quantitative method for quality evaluation of web sites and applications. IEEE Multimedia, 9(4), 20-29.
[70]. Orehovački, T., Granić, A., & Kermek, D. (2013). Evaluating the perceived and estimated quality in use of Web 2.0 applications. Journal of Systems and Software, 86(12), 3039-3059.
[71]. Papadomichelaki, X., & Mentzas, G. (2012). e- GovQual: A multiple-item scale for assessing e-government service quality. Government information Quarterly, 29(1), 98-109.
[72]. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., & Carey, T. (1994). Human-Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd. Essex, UK.
[73]. Petrie, H., & Bevan, N. (2009). The evaluation of accessibility, usability and user experience. In: Stephanidis, C. (Ed.), The Universal Access Handbook (pp. 1-15). CRC Press.
[74]. Petrie, H., & Kheir, O. (2007). The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 397-406). ACM.
[75]. Pérez-López, F. R. (2004). An evaluation of the contents and quality of menopause information on the World Wide Web. Maturitas, 49(4), 276-282.
[76]. Rocha, Á. (2012). Framework for a global quality evaluation of a website. Online Information Review, 36(3), 374-382.
[77]. Santos, A. M. (2015). Theoretical-Methodological proposal to evaluate the quality of educational websites to support education. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 397-401). ACM.
[78]. Schäfer, K., & Kummer, T. F. (2013). Determining the performance of website-based relationship marketing. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(18), 7571-7578.
[79]. Shchiglik, C., & Barnes, S. J. (2004). Evaluating website quality in the airline industry. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(3), 17-25.
[80]. Silius, K., Kailanto, M., & Tervakari, A. M. (2011). Evaluating the quality of social media in an educational context. In Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2011 IEEE (pp. 505-510). IEEE.
[81]. Sivaji, A., Abdullah, A., & Downe, A. G. (2011). Usability testing methodology: Effectiveness of heuristic evaluation in E-government website development. In Modelling Symposium (AMS), 2011 Fifth Asia (pp. 68-72). IEEE
[82]. Stefani, A., & Xenos, M. (2008). E-commerce system quality assessment using a model based on ISO 9126 and Belief Networks. Software Quality Journal, 16(1), 107-129.
[83]. Sun, C. C., & Lin, G. T. (2009). Using fuzzy TOPSIS method for evaluating the competitive advantages of shopping websites. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11764-11771.
[84]. Suwawi, D. D. J., Darwiyanto, E., & Rochmani, M. (2015). Evaluation of academic website using ISO/IEC 9126. In Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT), 2015 3rd International Conference on (pp. 222- 227). IEEE.
[85]. Tate, M., Evermann, J., Hope, B., & Barnes, S. (2007, January). Perceived service quality in a university web portal: revising the e-qual instrument. In System Sciences, 2007. HICSS 2007. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on IEEE.
[86]. Torrente, M. C. S., Prieto, A. B. M., GutiéRrez, D. A. & De Sagastegui, M. E. A. (2013). Sirius: A heuristic-based framework for measuring web usability adapted to the type of website. Journal of Systems and Software, 86(3), 649-663.
[87]. Triacca, L., Bolchini, D., Botturi, L. & Inversini, A. (2004). MiLE: Systematic Usability Evaluation for E-learning Web Applications. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (EDMEDIA), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
[88]. Vaughan, L. (2004). New measurements for search engine evaluation proposed and tested. Information Processing & Management, 40(4), 677-691.
[89]. Verdegem, P., & Verleye, G. (2009). User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Government information Quarterly, 26(3), 487-497.
[90]. Watanabe, T. (2009). Experimental evaluation of usability and accessibility of heading elements. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 4(4), 236-247.
[91]. Wenham, D., & Zaphiris, P. (2003). User interface evaluation methods for internet banking websites: A review, evaluation and case study. Human-Computer Interaction, Theory and Practice, 721-725.
[92]. Yen, B., Hu, P. J. H. & Wang, M. (2007). Toward an analytical approach for effective Web site design: A framework for modeling, evaluation and enhancement. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(2), 159-170.
[93]. Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of Internet shopping sites (SITEQUAL). Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2(1), 31-45.
[94]. Zhu, Y. (2004). Integrating external data from web sources into a data warehouse for OLAP and decision making. Shaker Verlag.
[95]. Zviran, M., Glezer, C. & Avni, I. (2006). User satisfaction from commercial web sites: The effect of design and use. Information and management, 43(2), 157-178.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.