Design Education and its Relevance to Career Progression

Tom Page*, Gisli Thorsteinsson**
* Senior Lecturer, Loughborough Design School, United Kingdom
** Professor, Department of Design and Craft Education, Iceland University of Education, Iceland.
Periodicity:March - May'2017
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.12.4.13547

Abstract

A survey was carried out to determine whether the way Design is taught at secondary and university level in the UK, adequately prepares pupils who choose to pursue a career in design and then to determine ways that it could be improved. A survey was completed with 13 participants, studying design at university, to discover from their perspective what skills were being taught and what skills they thought would benefit them to learn in more depth prior to university. The survey, moreover, contained a couple of questions targeted at participants who had undertaken some time out in industry to determine what advance information they felt would have been of benefit before their time in industry. This information combined with 3 interviews with current design graduates working in industry, was aimed at providing a view of what was required from the design industry. Of the participants who had spent time in industry, 100% of them felt better communication between industry and the education system would lead to better designers. 85% felt that design specific skills and the process of how to design needed to be taught in more depth. The major areas included in this were the ability to sketch and therefore express ideas better, CAD skills, and the ability to use programs such as Photoshop and Illustrator to display ideas. These were all areas that students felt had they learnt them at secondary school in more depth, or at all, would have aided them during study for their university degree. Next were the additional skills that the 3 design graduates and 12 placement students felt would have been beneficial to learn. It was also felt that enhanced experience of Photoshop and Illustrator at university would have made the introduction to some jobs easier, and that rather than it be taught as part of the syllabus currently they had to learn it themselves. The other main point was that better overall business skills and business understanding would have been highly beneficial. This included the ability to present ideas, both orally and on paper, brainstorming skills, teamwork and the ability to cost ideas.

Keywords

Design Education, Career, Students, Research Study.

How to Cite this Article?

Page, T., and Thorsteinsson, G. (2017). Design Education and its Relevance to Career Progression. i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 12(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.12.4.13547

References

[1]. Baynes, K. (1983). Young blood, Britain's Design Schools Today and Tomorrow. London: Lund Humphries.
[2]. Carter, D. (1983). Design in Education versus Design in Industry – are the objectives totally incompatible? The Stanley Lecture, Royal Society of Arts, London: Stanley Tools.
[3]. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity. In: Sternberg, R. J (ed) Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[4]. Dahncke, H. (1993). Leadership styles in teacher education and industry. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 3(1), 21-39.
[5]. Garner, S., & McDonagh, P.D. (2001). Problem interpretation and resolution via Visual Stimuli: The Use of 'Mood Boards' in Design education. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 20(1), 57-64.
[6]. Kimbell, R., & Stables, K. (2007). Researching Design Leaning; Issues and Finding from Two Decades of Research and Development. London: Springer.
[7]. Knight, L.R. (2010). We'll need the industry to lend a helping hand to design education. Design Week.
[9]. Nicholl, B (2004). Teaching and learning creativity. Paper presented at the 2004 DATA International Research Conference, Creativity in Design and Technology and ICT: Imagining Possibilities in a Digital Age. Wellesbourne: Grover.
[10]. Nicholl, B., & McLellan, R. (2007). The contribution of product analysis to fixation in students' design and technology work. In E. Norman, & D. Spendlove (Eds), The Design and Technology Association Education and International Research Conference 2007. Conference Proceedings. Wellesbourne, The Design & Technology Association, 71-76.
[11]. Page, T., Thorsteinsson, G., & Ha, J.G. (2007). Technology Enhanced Learning in Design Education Through the Use of Virtual Reality Learning Environments, Journal of Asia-Pacific Society of Design: Design Forum, 4(5), 213-224. ISBN 1975-2946.
[12]. Rogers, M., & Clare, D. (1992). Design and technology curriculum development in initial teacher education through partnership with local industry. IDATER 1992 Conference. In: Department of Design Studies, Goldsmiths' College, University of London, 168-170.
[13]. Sislian, J. (1988). British and German Industrial Designers: Education and Training: A Comparative Study. London: Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial Society.
[14]. The Department of Design Education and Science (1987). Design Education and Industry: report of a Seminar th held on 11 May 1987 In: Design Education and Industry, Great Britain, 1-4.
[15]. Thistlewood, D. (1990). Issues of Design Education. Singapore: Longman Singapore.
[16]. Thorsteinsson, G. (2008). Design and Craft education in Iceland. A Poster introduced at the conference D&T - A Platform for Success. The Design and Technology Association Education and International Conference 2009. Loughborough University, Loughborough.
[17]. Ward, T.B. (1994). Structured imagination: The roles of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 1-40.
[18]. Ward, T.B. (1995). What's old about new ideas? In: Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B. and Finke, R. A. (eds), The creative cognition approach , 157-178.Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.