Railway risk Assessment: A case study of staff risk at Victoria line deport in London underground

Min An*
senior lecturer in School of EngineeringfCivil Engineering) at the University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham.B15 2TT, UK
Periodicity:May - July'2006
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jfet.1.4.988

Abstract

Staff risk analysis in the railway maintenance workplaces is a very complicated subject determined by numerous aspects including human error. Many risk assessment techniques currently used are comparatively mature tools. Howerver, in many circumstances, the application of these tools may not give satisfactory results due to the risk data incomplete or the high level of uncertainty involved in the risk data. This paper presents a methodology for staff risk assessment using fuzzy reasoning approaches (FRA), in particular, in the railway maintenance workplaces. The proposed method can evaluate qualitative and quantitative risk data associated with the railway maintenance workplaces in a uniform manner for staff risk analysis. Input parameters, probability of occurrence of hazardous events and their consequent severities in terms of membership functions, are used as inpurt information to analyse risks. The risk associated with the risk rules is then mapped back to the defined risk level expressions. The outcomes of the risk assessment are represented as the risk degrees and the defined risk categories of risk levels with a belief of percentage, which provide very useful risk information to risk analysts, project managers and site engineers. The proposed methodology permits risk analysts to assess the risks associated with the hazardous events directly using linguistic terms. This will provide railway risk analysts, managers and engineers with a method and tool to improve their safety management and set saftety standards. A case example on staff risk assessment at Victoria line depot is used to demonstrate the proposed approach. The result indicate that by using the proposed methodology risks associated with a railway maintenance workplace can be assessed effectively and efficiently. The proposed method could be transferred to other applications and used by other industrial companies who face to manage saftety and health on the construction sites.

Keywords

Railway Maintenance Wokplace, Risk Assessment, Fuzzy Reasoning Approach, Staff Risk Assessment.

How to Cite this Article?

Min An (2006). Railway risk Assessment: A case study of staff risk at Victoria line deport in London underground. i-manager’s Journal on Future Engineering and Technology, 1(4), 42-60. https://doi.org/10.26634/jfet.1.4.988

References

[1].An, M., Lin, W. and Stirling, A., Afuzzy reasoning based approach to qualitative railway risk assessment. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, PartF: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 220(2).
[2].An, M., Lin, W. and Stirling, A. Railway safety risk assessment using fuzzy reasoning approach. World Journal of Engineering 2005,2(2), 198-207.
[3.]An, M. Safety assessment in railway the current status and future aspects. World Journal of Engineering 2005, 2(1), 10-23
[4].An, M. Application of a knowledge-based intelligent safety prediction system to railway infrastructure maintenance. Proceeding of International Railway Engineering Conference, London, 6-7 July 2004 (CD format).
[5].An, M. and Foyer, P, Railway maintenance and safety: artificial intelligent links. Proceeding of International Railway Engineering Conference, London 14-16 July 2003 (CD format).
[6].An, M., Wang, J. and Ruxton, T. Risk analysis of offshore installation using approximate reasoning in concept design stage. Proceedings of the ESREL 2000 and SRA-Europe Annual Conference, Edinburgh, 15-17 May 2000, pp. 631-639.
[7].An, M., Wang, J. and Ruxton, T. The development of a fuzzy rule base for risk analysis of offshore engineering products using approximate reasoning approaches. Proceeding of Engineering Design Conference, London, 27-29 June 2000, pp. 327-338.
[8].Bowles, J.B. and Pelaez, C.E. Fuzzy logic prioritisation of failure in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1995, 50,203-213.
[9].Bowles, J.B. and Pelaez, C.E. Application of fuzzy logic to reliability engineering. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1995,83(3): 435-449.
[10].European Standard, EN50126: Railway applications The specification and demonstration of reliability, availability, maintainability and safety (RAMS), CENELEC, September, 1999.
[11].Health & Safety Executive (HSE), Railways (Safely Case) Regulations 2000, ISBN 0 71761892 7.
[12].Jang, J.S., Sun, C. T. and Mizutani, E. Neuro-Fuzzy and Soft Computing: A Computational Approach to Learning and Machine Intelligence, 1997, Prentice Hall.
[13].Kennedy, A. Risk management and assessment for rolling stock safety cases. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 1997,211,67 72.
[14].Lin, W., An, M. and Stirling, A. Railway safety assessment using fuzzy reasoning approach. Proceeding of International Railway Engineering, London, 6-7 July 2004 (CD format).
[15].Lin, W., An, M. and Stirling, A. Development of railway safety and risk analysis system using fuzzy reasoning approaches. Proceeding of International Railway Engineering, London, 29-30 June 2005 (CD format).
[16].LUL, London Underground Limited Quantified Risk Assessment Update 2001, Issue 1,2001.
[17]. LU L Health, Safety and Environmental Management System (HSEMS) Directive 5.2.
[18].Mathews, J.H. Numeric Methods for Mathematics, Science and Engineering, 1992, Prentice Hall, 2nd Ed.
[19].Mendel, J.M. fuzzy logic system for engineering: A tutorial, Proceedings of the IEEE, 1995,83(3), 345-377.
[20].Metronet SSL, 2005a, Development of Metronet staff risk model. First Metronet SSL Interim Report.
[21 ].Metronet SSL, 2005b, Framework for the assessment ofHS&E risks. Second Metronet SSL Interim Report.
[22].Muttram, R.l. Railway safety's safety risk model. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and RapIdTransIt, 2002,216,71 79.
[23].Railway Safety, Profile of safety risk on the UK mainline railway, SP-RSK-3.1.3.11, Issue 3,2003.
[24].Railway Safety, Guidance on the preparation of risk assessment within railway safety cases, Railway Group Guidance Note-GE/GN8561, Issue 1, June, 2002.
[25].Sii, H.S., Ruxton, T. and Wang, J. A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative safety modelling for marine systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2001, 73,19-34.
[26].Yadav, O.P., Singh, N., Chinnam, R.B. and Goel, RS. A fuzzy logic based approach to reliability improvement estimation during product development. Reliability
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.