The “Intentionality Measurement Instrument” [Or “IMI”]: A Comprehensive Psychometric Instrument Based upon the Dual Quadrant Scalar Model of Intentionality that is Designed to Measure Intent, Motive Type, and Disposition

James Edward Osler II*
Faculty Member, School of Education (SOE), North Carolina Central University (NCCU), North Carolina, USA.
Periodicity:August - October'2016
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.10.2.8275

Abstract

The overall aim of this paper is to provide an epistemological rational for the measurement of intentionality. The purpose of this narrative is to identify “Intentionality” as an arena of action in the dispositional learning domain can be measured using an “Intentionality Measurement Instrument” [also referred by the acronym “IMI”] based upon a dual scalar model similar to the measurement of the correlation coefficient. The methodology of the “IMI” is to statistically test intentionality via specific psychometric instruments. The IMI as an educational science statistical metric has universal applicability and is ideally suited for measurement of purposive content (the subject matter area), purposive capability (the psychomotor domain), and purposive knowledge (the cognitive domain) based directly upon disposition (the affective domain-which determines the will, purpose, and reason behind the identified event). This methodology is a novel approach to much needed dispositional statistical data analysis. It adds considerable value to the methods designed to assess rationale and reason through specific instrument validity and reliability. A sequential computational methodology for IMI statistical analysis through a model is provided to clarity the metrics that are procedurally used in a step by step fashion that illustrates the entire process of intentionality inquiry.

Keywords

Analysis, Educational Science, Intentionality, IMI, Outcomes, Psychometrics, Research, Statistical Test, Statistics, Triostatistics, Validation.

How to Cite this Article?

Osler, J. E., II. (2016). The “Intentionality Measurement Instrument” [Or “IMI”]: A Comprehensive Psychometric Instrument Based upon the Dual Quadrant Scalar Model of Intentionality that is Designed to Measure Intent, Motive Type, and Disposition. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 10(2), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.10.2.8275

References

[1]. Astington, J. W., (1993). The Child's Discovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[2]. Bratman, M., (1987). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[3]. Blakemore, S.J., & Decety, J., (2001). “From the perception of action to the understanding of intention”. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Vol. 2(8), pp. 561-567.
[4]. Feinfield, K.A., Lee, P.P., Flavell, E.R., Green, F.L., & Flavell, J.H., (1999). “Young children's understanding of intention”. Cognitive Development, Vol. 14(3), pp. 463- 486.
[5]. Lee, E.A., (1995). “Young Children's Representational Understanding of Intention”. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 56 (12-B).
[6]. Malle, B.F., & Knobe, J., (1997). “The folk concept of intentionality”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 33(2), pp. 101-121.
[7]. Malle, B.F., (1999). “How people explain behavior: A new theoretical framework”. Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 3(1), pp. 23-48.
[8]. Osler, J.E., (2014). “Triostatistics: The Application of Innovative In–Depth Advanced Post Hoc Statistical Metrics for the Assessment and Analysis of Statistically Significant Tri–Squared Test Outcomes”. Kentucky Journal of Excellence in College Teaching and Learning, Vol. 12(3), pp. 27–39.
[9]. Osler, J.E., (2013). “The psychological efficacy of education as a science through personal, professional, and contextual inquiry of the affective learning domain”. i-manager's Journal on Educational Psychology, Print ISSN: 0973-8827, Online ISSN: 2230-7141, Vol. 6(4), pp. 36–41.
[10]. Osler, J.E., (2012a). “Trichotomy–Squared – A novel mixed methods test and research procedure designed to analyze, transform, and compare qualitative and quantitative data for education scientists who are administrators, practitioners, teachers, and technologists”. i-manager's Journal on Mathematics, Print ISSN: 2277-5129, Online ISSN: 2277-5137, Vol. 1(3), pp. 23–31.
[11]. Osler, J.E., & Waden, C., (2012b). “Using innovative technical solutions as an intervention for at risk students: A meta–cognitive statistical analysis to determine the impact of ninth grade freshman academies, centers, and center models upon minority student retention and achievement ”. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, Print ISSN: 0973-2217, Online ISSN: 2230-7133, Vol. 7(3), pp. 11–23.
[ 1 2 ] . Perner,J.,(1991).Understanding The Representational Mind. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
[13]. Rust, J. & Golombok, S., (1989). Modern Psychometrics: The Science of Psychological Assessment, (2nd ed.). Florence, KY, US: Taylor & Frances/Routledge.
[14]. Searle, J.R., (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press.
[15]. Shantz, C.U., (1983). Social Cognition. Handbook of Child Psychology: Cognitive Development, (4th ed.), New York: Wiley, Vol. 3, pp. 495-555.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.